Preview

Koloproktologia

Advanced search

CURRENT PRACTICE OF TRISULFATE APPLYING FOR BOWEL CLEANSING IN ACCORDING TO CLINICAL SAFETY POSITIONS

https://doi.org/10.33878/2073-7556-2020-19-4-93-99

Abstract

High-quality bowel cleansing is the basis for effective colon examination. Inadequate preparation of the colon can be the reason for nondetection of colorectal polyps during the examination and reach 12%. The objective of this publication is to present current literature data based on the principles of evidence-based medicine that address the safety of using trisulfate in preparation for colonoscopy. It was found that the drug for intestinal cleansing, which is a low-volume one-liter hyperosmotic based on a combination of sodium, potassium and magnesium sulfate salts, has a high efficiency of preparing the intestine for colonoscopy. The percentage of patients with successful bowel preparation using trisulfate is 97%. At the same time, the drug has an acceptable safety profile, including for patients from risk groups. The results of this review indicate that the new low-volume one-liter trisulfate is an effective remedy for providing one of the most important indicators of highquality  colonoscopy - bowel cleansing and has a high safety profile.


About the Authors

D. V. Zavyalov
State Budgetary Healthcare Institution of the Yaroslavl Region "Clinical Oncology Hospital"
Russian Federation
prospekt Oktyabrya, 67, Yaroslavl, 150054, Russia



S. V. Kashin
State Budgetary Healthcare Institution of the Yaroslavl Region "Clinical Oncology Hospital"
Russian Federation
prospekt Oktyabrya, 67, Yaroslavl, 150054, Russia



References

1. Zav`yalov D.V., Kashin S.V. Propushhenny`e neoplazii tolstoj kishki. Koloproktologia. 2015, no.1(51), pp.32-37. (in Russ.).

2. Knyazev M.V., Scherbakov P.L., Parfenov A.I. Colon cleansing before colonoscopy: balance of effectiveness, safety and accessability of the medications. Endoscopic surgery. 2015; no.3, pp. 30-36. (in Russ.).

3. Mtvralashvili D.A., Veselov V.V., Galyaev A.V. et al. Polyethylene Glycol: Preparation of Patients for Endoscopic Procedures. Lechebnoe delo. 2016; no.3, pp.85-90. (in Russ.).

4. Kostenko N.V., Veselov V.V. Domestic polyetheltneglycol drug in the diagnosis of colonopathies. Farmateca. 2010; nğ.20(213), pp.72-75. (in Russ.).

5. Di Palma JA. A Randomized Clinical Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of a New, Reduced-Volume, Oral Sulfate Colon-Cleansing Preparation for Colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009; 104: 2275-84.

6. Rex DK. A randomized clinical study comparing reduced-volume oral sulfate solution with standard 4-liter sulfate-free electrolyte lavage solution as preparation for colonoscopy gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Aug 19;72(2):328-36. Epub 2010 Jun 19.

7. Harrison NM. Bowel cleansing before colonoscopy. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 January 10; 8(1):4-12.

8. Lynn Huynh MPH, Yermakov S, Davis M. et al. Cost-analysis model of colonoscopy preparation using split-dose reduced-volume oral sulfate solution (OSS) and polyethylene glycol with electrolytes solution (PEG-ELS). Journal of Medical Economics. 2016; v.19, Issue 4.

9. Fedorov E.D., Veselov V.V., Kashin S.V., Tikhomirova E.V., et al. Assessment of Bowel Preparation Using Low-Volume SulphateBased Preparations in Comparison with Macrogols: A Multicenter, Randomized, Comparative Clinical Study of the 3rd Phase. Russian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Coloproctology. 2019; no.29(2), pp.60-75. (In Russ.)

10. Khitaryan A.G., Kovalev S.A., Romodan N.A. et al. The first results of one day preparation with sulfate-based hyperosmotic solution as a preparatory stage for performing endoscopic examinations and (or) surgical treatment on the colon. Koloproktologia. 2019; v.18, no. S3 (69), p.103. (in Russ.).

11. Pelham RW. A Pharmacokinetics Evaluation of a New, Low-Volume, Oral Sulfate Colon Cleansing Preparation in Patients With Renal or Hepatic Impairment and Healthy Volunteers. J Clin Pharmacol. 2010;50:350-354.

12. Pаtel V. Intestinal and Renal Effects of Low-Volume Phosphate and Sulfate Cathartic Solutions Designed for Cleansing the Colon: Pathophysiological Studies in Five Normal Subjects. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. 2009; v. 104, Issue 4, p.953-965. DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2008.124

13. Cole DE, Thurgood AM, Whiting SJ. Increased serum sulfate after protein loading in adult humans. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 1991; 69: 25-27.

14. Cole DE, Evrovski J. The clinical chemistry of inorganic sulfate. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2000; 37: 299-344

15. Anastassopoulos K, Farraye FA, Knight T. et al. A Comparative Study of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Following Use of Common Bowel Preparations Among a Colonoscopy Screening Population: Results from a Post-Marketing Observational Study. Dig Dis Sci. 2016;61(10):2993-3006.

16. Moulin B, Ponchon T. A comparative review of use of sulphate and phosphate salts for colonoscopy preparations and their potential for nephrotoxicity. Endosc Int Open. 2018;6(10):E1206-E1213. doi: 10.1055/a-0581-8723

17. Smith JM, Lowe RF, Fullerton J et al. An integrative review of the side effects related to the use of magnesium sulfate for preeclampsia and eclampsia management. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013; 13:34

18. Saltzman JR, Cash BD, et al. ASGE Standards of Practice Committee. Bowel preparation before colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015; 81:781.

19. FDA - Food and Drug Administration. https://gmpnews.ru/terminologiya/fda/ (date: 29.05.2020)

20. Hassan C, East J, Radaelli F, et al. Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2019. Endoscopy. 2019;51(8):775-794. doi: 10.1055/a-0959-0505

21. Summary of product characteristics Eziclen (in Russ).


Review

For citations:


Zavyalov D.V., Kashin S.V. CURRENT PRACTICE OF TRISULFATE APPLYING FOR BOWEL CLEANSING IN ACCORDING TO CLINICAL SAFETY POSITIONS. Koloproktologia. 2020;19(4):93-99. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33878/2073-7556-2020-19-4-93-99

Views: 833


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-7556 (Print)
ISSN 2686-7303 (Online)