Endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection for a giant adenoma of the cecum (case report)
https://doi.org/10.33878/2073-7556-2021-20-1-41-45
Abstract
Endoscopic removal of giant adenomas of the cecum is associated with high risk of perforation and conversion to laparoscopic procedure. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for cecal adenomas had technical limitations due to the adjacent ileocecal valve and appendix opening, perpendicular operating angle. Case presentation of the possibility of successful removal of a large laterally spreading cecal adenoma by the method of endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection (ESTD) never been described before for this tumor site and size. Patient 54 years old, an LST-G adenoma (5 cm in diameter, according to Kudo – IIIL, according to Sano – II) was detected in the dome of the cecum during colonoscopy. ESTD. The postoperative period without any unfavorable events; the patient was discharged on the 5th day after surgery. The morphological conclusion: tubulo-villous adenoma with moderate epithelial dysplasia, R0. ESTD is suitable for cecal giant adenomas.
About the Authors
O. M. Iugai
Ryzhikh National Medical Research Center of Coloproctology
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Oleg M. Iugai
Salyama Adilya str., 2, Moscow, 123423
D. A. Mtvralashvili
Ryzhikh National Medical Research Center of Coloproctology
Dmitry A. Mtvralashvili
Salyama Adilya str., 2, Moscow, 123423
A. A. Likutov
Ryzhikh National Medical Research Center of Coloproctology;
Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education of the Ministry of Healthcare of Russia
Alexey A. Likutov
Salyama Adilya str., 2, Moscow, 123423,
Barrikadnaya str., 2/1-1, Moscow, 125993
Yu. E. Vaganov
Ryzhikh National Medical Research Center of Coloproctology
Yuri E. Vaganov
Salyama Adilya str., 2, Moscow, 123423
References
1. Miura Y, Shinozaki S, Hayashi Y. et al. Duodenal endoscopic submucosal dissection is feasible using the pocket-creation method. Endoscopy. 2017 Jan; 49(1):8-14. DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-116315
2. Yang JL, Gan T, Zhu LL et al. Endoscopic Submucosal Tunnel Dissection: A Feasible Solution for Large Superficial Rectal Neoplastic Lesions. Dis Colon Rectum. 2017 Aug;60(8):866-871. DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000805
3. Sakamoto H, Hayashi Y, Miura Y et al. Pocket-creation method facilitates endoscopic submucosal dissection of colorectal laterally spreading tumors, non-granular type. Endosc Int Open. 2017 Feb; 5(2): P. 123-129. DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-122778
4. Kanamori A, Nakano M, Kondo M et al. Clinical effectiveness of the pocket-creation method for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection. Endosc Int Open. 2017 Dec;5(12):E1299-E1305. DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-118744
5. Aslan F, Akpinar Z, Yurtlu DA et al. Single tunneling method with endoscopic submucosal dissection for treatment of rectal giant (18-cm) laterally spreading tumor. Endoscopy. 2017 Feb; 49(S 01):114-116. DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-100218
6. Mtvralashvili D.A. endoscopic dissection in the submucosal layer of epithelial neoplasms of the right colon. Diss … Candidate of medical Sciences: 14.01.17: protected 19.12.19. (in Russ.).
7. Mtvralashvili D.A., Likutov A.A., Veselov V.V., Mainovskaya O.A. et al. Does lesion site affects outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colon neoplasia? Koloproktologia. 2019; v. 18, no. 2, pp. 33-41. (in Russ.). DOI: 10.33878/2073-7556-2019-18-2-33-41
8. Yoshida Naohisa et al. The efficiacy of the pocket-creation method for cases with severe fibrosis in colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection. Endoscopy International Open. 2018;06:975-983. DOI: 10.1055/a-0593-5818
9. Shelygin Yu.A., Chernyshov S.V., Mainovskaya O.A., Zarodnyuk I.V. et al. Early Rectal Cancer: Can Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery (TEM) Become the Standard Treatment? Vestnik Rossiiskoi Akademii Medicinskih Nauk. 2016; т. 71, no. 4, pp. 323-331. (in Russ.). DOI: 10.15690/vramn719
Review
For citations:
Iugai O.M., Mtvralashvili D.A., Likutov A.A., Vaganov Yu.E. Endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection for a giant adenoma of the cecum (case report). Koloproktologia. 2021;20(1):41-45. https://doi.org/10.33878/2073-7556-2021-20-1-41-45
Views:
898
Email this article 
