CONTRAST-ENHANCED ULTRASOUND IMAGING OF COLORECTAL LIVER METASTASES
https://doi.org/10.33878/2073-7556-2017-0-2S-32-36
Abstract
At present, aggressive surgical approach in combination with perioperative chemotherapy allows to extend indications for surgical intervention in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, since only a radical liver resection provides better long-term survival. Contrast enhancement imaging techniques are important before considering treatment options to identify patients with resectable and potentially resectableliver metastases. Our study evaluated the qualitative and quantitative parameters of thedynamic enhancement pattern of liver metastases. This review will be analyzed the results of liver contrast-enhanced ultrasound studies in 104 patients with secondary colorectal liver metastases before primary tumor resection, as well as the monitoring of systemic chemotherapy and post-ablation follow-up to access treatment respond.
About the Authors
L. A. Mitina
Р. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute - Branch Of The National Medical Research Radiological Centre Of The Ministry Of Health Of Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
S. O. Stepanov
Р. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute - Branch Of The National Medical Research Radiological Centre Of The Ministry Of Health Of Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
D. V. Sidorov
Р. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute - Branch Of The National Medical Research Radiological Centre Of The Ministry Of Health Of Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
O. V. Guts
Р. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute - Branch Of The National Medical Research Radiological Centre Of The Ministry Of Health Of Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
L. O. Petrov
Р. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute - Branch Of The National Medical Research Radiological Centre Of The Ministry Of Health Of Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
V. V. Ratushnaya
Р. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute - Branch Of The National Medical Research Radiological Centre Of The Ministry Of Health Of Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
A. L. Kornietskaya
Р. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute - Branch Of The National Medical Research Radiological Centre Of The Ministry Of Health Of Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Y. A. Solovyev
Р. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute - Branch Of The National Medical Research Radiological Centre Of The Ministry Of Health Of Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
M. V. Lozhkin
Р. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute - Branch Of The National Medical Research Radiological Centre Of The Ministry Of Health Of Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Болотина, Л.В. Роль периоперационной лекарственной терапии в комбинированном лечении генерализованного колоректального рака с изолированным поражением печени или легких. / Болотина Л.В., Пайчадзе А.А., Корниецкая А.Л. и соавт. // Онкологическая колопроктология. - 2013. - № 3. - с. 38-43.
2. Гуц, О.В. Методологические аспекты инвазивного и неинвазивного ультразвукового исследования печени у больных с метастазами колоректального рака при планировании хирургического лечения: Дис..канд. мед. наук. - М., 2012. - 126 с.
3. Минимальные клинические рекомендации Европейского Общества Медицинской Онкологии (ЕSМО)/ Редакторы русского перевода: проф. С.А. Тюляндин, к.м.н. Д.А. Носов; проф. Н.И. Переводчикова. - М.: Издательская группа РОНЦ им. Н.Н. Блохина РАМН, 2010. - 436 с.
4. Орлова, Л.П. Диагностические возможности ультразвуковых методов исследования в коло-проктологии. / Л.П. Орлова // Колопроктология. -2006. - № 1 (15). - с. 3-10. _
5. Рак ободочной кишки: практические рекомендации (учебное пособие). / под ред.: В.П. Петрова, Р.В. Орловой, В.А. Кащенко. - 2-ое издание. - СПб.: Х-PRINT, 2014. - 39 c.
6. Сидоров, Д.В. Первый опыт двухэтапной резекции печени по типу «insitusplit» у пациентки с билобарными метастазами колоректального рака на фоне периоперационной полихимиотерапии. / Д.В. Сидоров, Л.В. Болотина, М.В. Ложкин и соавт. // Анналы хирургической гепатологии. - 2014. -№ 3. - с. 107-112.
7. Степанов, С.О. Ультразвуковая диагностика очаговых образований в печени с использованием контрастного препарата Соновью. / С.О. Степанов, Л.А. Митина, В.И. Казакевич и соавт. // Медицинская технология. - М., 2015. - ил. - 16 с.
8. Cantisani, V. Liver metastases: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound compared with computed tomography and magnetic resonance. / V. Cantisani, H. Grazhdani, C. Fioravanti et al. // World J. Gastroenterol. - 2014 Aug 7; 20 (29): 9998-10007.
9. Claudon, M. Guidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) - Update 2008. / M. Claudon, D. Cosgrove, T. Albrecht et al. // Ultraschall in Med. - 2008; 29: 28-44.
10. Greis, C. Technological review: contrast -enhanced ultrasonography. / C. Greis // Contrast enhancedultrasound modality: the new diagnostic imaging tool. Springer Press ISBN 978-88-470-07819. - 2008, p. 1-5.
11. Greis, C. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for the characterization of focal liver lesions in clinical practice (DEGUM Multicenter Trial): CEUS vs. MRI - a Prospective Comparison in 269 Patients. / C. Greis // Ultraschall in Med. - 2010; 31 (5): 492-9.
12. Westwood, M. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound using SonoVue® (sulphur hexafluoride microbubbles) compared with contrast-enhanced computed tomography and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for the characterisation of focal liver lesions and detection of liver metastases: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis. / M. Westwood, M. Joore, J. Grutters et al. // Health Technol Assess. - 2013 Apr; 17 (16): 1-243.
Review
For citations:
Mitina L.A., Stepanov S.O., Sidorov D.V., Guts O.V., Petrov L.O., Ratushnaya V.V., Kornietskaya A.L., Solovyev Y.A., Lozhkin M.V. CONTRAST-ENHANCED ULTRASOUND IMAGING OF COLORECTAL LIVER METASTASES. Koloproktologia. 2017;(2S):32-36. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33878/2073-7556-2017-0-2S-32-36
Views:
556
Email this article 
