THE ANALYSIS OF THE REMOTE FUNCTIONAL RESULTS OF THE ELECTIVE COLONIC RESECTION AT DIVERTICULAR DISEASES
https://doi.org/10.33878/2073-7556-2016-0-1-30-34
Abstract
AIM. To evaluate long-term results of treatment of patients with the complicated diverticular diseases, after elective colonic resection. PATIENTS. The outcome of 53 patient operated on pretreated recurrent diverticulitis were compared to results of treatment of 50 patients with diverticulitis complicated by perforation and treated initially by colostomy formation. RESULTS. In the first group the number of patients with postoperative functional gastrointestinal frustration and infringements in psychic and emotional sphere were higher, than in second group and correlated to presence of them before operation. Assessment of quality of life using MOS-SF 36 demonstrated decrease of score in all scales of the questionnaire infirst group, while in second group average score was comparable to healthy individuals. CONCLUSION. Indications for elective colonic resectionfor recurrent diverticulitis should be stricter.
About the Authors
V. I. Pomazkin
Sverdlovsk Regional Clinical Hospital for War Veterans
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
V. V. Khodakov
Sverdlovsk Regional Clinical Hospital for War Veterans
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Anaya D., Flum D. Risk of emergency colectomy and colostomy in patients with diverticular disease. Arch. Surg. - 2005. - vol. 140. - p. 681-685.
2. Broderick-Villa G., Burchette R., Collins C. et al. Hospitalisation for acute diverticulitis does not mandate routine elective colectomy. Arch.Surg. -2005. - vol. 140. - p. 576-581.
3. Egger B., Peter M., Candinas D. Persistent symptoms after elective sigmoid resection for diverticulitis. Dis. Colon Rectum. - 2008. - vol. 51. - p. 1044-1048.
4. Janes S., Meagher A., Frizelte F. Elective surgery after acute diverticulitis. Br. Jour. Surg. - 2005. -vol. 92. - p. 133-142.
5. Moreno A., Willie-Jorgensen P. Long-term outcome in 445 patients after diagnosis of diverticular disease. Colorectal Dis. - 2007. - vol. 9. - p. 464-468.
6. Munson K., Hensien M., Jacob. et al. Diverticulitis: a comprehensive follow-up. Dis. Colon Rectum. -1996. - vol. 39. - p. 318-322.
7. Simpson J., Neal K., Scholefield J. et al. Patterns of pain in diverticular disease and the influence of acute diverticulitis. Eur. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. - 2003. -vol. 15. - p. 1005-1010.
8. Stollman N., Raskin J. Diagnosis and management of diverticular disease of the colon in adults. Ad hoc practice parameters of the American College of Gastroenterology. Am. Jour. Gastroenterol. - 1999. -vol. 94. - p. 3110-3121.
9. Thorn M., Graf W., Stefansson T. et al. Clinical and functional results after elective colonic resection in 75 consecutive patients with diverticular disease. Am. Jour. Surg. - 2002. - vol. 183. - p. 7-11.
10. Ware J., Sherbourne C. The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). Med. Care. - 1992. -vol. 30. - p. 473-483.
11. Wolff B., Devine R. Surgical management of diverticulitis. Am.Surg. - 2000. - vol. 66. - p. 153-157.
Review
For citations:
Pomazkin V.I., Khodakov V.V. THE ANALYSIS OF THE REMOTE FUNCTIONAL RESULTS OF THE ELECTIVE COLONIC RESECTION AT DIVERTICULAR DISEASES. Koloproktologia. 2016;(1):30-34. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33878/2073-7556-2016-0-1-30-34
Views:
461
Email this article 
