Preview

Koloproktologia

Advanced search

Prospective Observational Comparative Study on the Outcomes of Open Haemorrhoidectomy versus Stapled Haemorrhoidopexy in Grade III and Grade IV Haemorrhoids

https://doi.org/10.33878/2073-7556-2026-25-2-20-26

Abstract

AIM: to compare the outcomes of open haemorrhoidectomy and stapled hemorrhoidopexy in patients with Grade III and Grade IV haemorrhoids.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: this prospective observational comparative study was conducted at Kasturba medical college, Manipal, from March 2023 to March 2025. 26 patients undergoing open haemorrhoidectomy and 26 patients undergoing stapled hemorrhoidopexy were compared. Parameters assessed included operative time, postoperative pain (VAS on POD 1 and 3), analgesic requirement, bowel activity, urinary retention, postoperative bleeding, duration of hospital stay, return to work, and follow-up outcomes.

RESULTS: grade III haemorrhoids accounted for 88.5% of cases. Operative time was similar in both groups (median: 60 minutes). Postoperative pain scores and analgesic needs showed no significant difference. Urinary retention was significantly higher in the stapled group (34.6%) compared to the open group (11.5%). Other parameters, including return to work and complication rates, were comparable.

CONCLUSION: both open haemorrhoidectomy and stapled hemorrhoidopexy are effective in treating advanced haemorrhoids. However, stapled hemorrhoidopexy demonstrated a higher incidence of urinary retention. Surgical approach can be individualized based on patient profile and resource availability.

About the Authors

Nejima Ayshath
Kasturba Medical College, MAHE University
India

Junior Resident Department of General Surgery



Dcruz Steffi
Kasturba Medical College, MAHE University
India

Assistant Professor Department of General Surgery



L. Badareesh
Kasturba Medical College, MAHE University
India

Professor & Unit Chief Department Of General Surgery



Samuel Roshen
Kasturba Medical College, MAHE University
India

Assistant Professor Department Of General Surgery



References

1. Pillant-Le Moult H, Aubert M, De Parades V. Classical treatment of haemorrhoids. J Visc Surg. 2015;152(2 Suppl):S3–9.

2. Singer M, Abcarian H. Stapled hemorrhoidopexy: the argument for usage. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2004;17(2):131–42.

3. Kishore N, Choudhary A, Rathi M, et al. A comparative study between closed and open haemorrhoidectomy in terms of surgical site infection. Int J Anat Radiol Surg. 2016;5(3):1–5.

4. Kumar M, Pankaj D, Kumar N, et al. A prospective study comparing stapler and open surgical technique of haemorrhoidectomy. Cureus. 2023;15(3):e36304.

5. Bota R, Palade R, Păun S, et al. Stapled haemorrhoidectomy versus open haemorrhoidectomy: a comparative study. J Visc Surg. 2015;152(1):11–4.

6. Surati K, Modi J, Damani S, et al. Comparative study of management of haemorrhoids: stapler vs open haemorrhoidectomy. World J Lap Surg. 2022;15(1):8–10.

7. Malyadri N, Allu VJ, Reddy P, et al. A prospective comparative study of stapler haemorrhoidectomy vs open haemorrhoidectomy (Milligan Morgan) in its outcome and postoperative complications. J Surg Res. 2021;4:4–13.

8. Chen Y, Wang X, Liu Z, et al. Clinical outcomes of stapled hemorrhoidopexy using a novel three-row stapler for grade III/IV haemorrhoids: a single-center experience with literature review. J Clin Images Med Case Rep. 2024;4(3):2343.

9. Manzoor A, Khan M, Ali S, et al. ENSEAL® haemorrhoidectomy, a novel technique, versus conventional open method for the management of grade III and IV haemorrhoids. J Visc Surg. 2025;162(2):123–9.

10. Batheja S, Gupta R, Sharma A, et al. Comparative study between stapled hemorrhoidopexy and open haemorrhoidectomy. J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol. 2025;30(3):1–5.


Review

For citations:


Ayshath N., Steffi D., Badareesh L., Roshen S. Prospective Observational Comparative Study on the Outcomes of Open Haemorrhoidectomy versus Stapled Haemorrhoidopexy in Grade III and Grade IV Haemorrhoids. Koloproktologia. 2026;25(2):20-26. https://doi.org/10.33878/2073-7556-2026-25-2-20-26

Views: 86

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-7556 (Print)
ISSN 2686-7303 (Online)