Late outcomes of J-pouch in patients after proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis
https://doi.org/10.33878/2073-7556-2026-25-1-48-54
Abstract
AIM: to assess late functional outcomes and quality of life of restorative proctocolectomy with J-pouch in patients with ulcerative colitis.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: the retrospective study included 76 patients operated in 2013–2018. Quality of life and continence were assessed using the SF-36 questionnaire and the Wexner incontinence scale. The first survey was done in 2018–2019, and the second one — in 2025. Complete paired data were obtained from 49 (64.5%) patients. Paired comparisons between the two surveys were performed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Associations between QoL and continence function were analyzed using multiple linear regression.
RESULTS: a significant decrease was detected in several SF-36 domains: general health (GH) 67 (50; 82) vs 57 (47; 75), p = 0.028; vitality (VT) 67 (50; 82) vs 57 (47; 75), p = 0.0008; mental health (MH) 72 (60; 86) vs 64 (52; 74), p = 0.013; and in the mental component summary (MCS) 51.1 (40.5; 55.1) vs 45.3 (38.7; 51), p = 0.013. No significant differences were found in the remaining domains. A marked increase in incontinence symptoms was noted over time: the median Wexner score increased from 1 (0; 2) to 4 (1; 10.5), p < 0.0001. However, no significant association was found between deterioration of continence and quality of life according to regression analysis. Female gender was identified as an independent predictor of lower QoL (p = 0,046).
CONCLUSION: over time, patients with a J-pouch demonstrated a significant decline in continence function and quality of life due to worse psychoemotional domains, while physical components remained relatively stable. No significant correlation was found between QoL and continence impairment.
About the Authors
Bulat R. KalanovRussian Federation
Salyama Adilya st., 2, Moscow, 123423
Oleg I. Sushkov
Russian Federation
Salyama Adilya st., 2, Moscow, 123423
Denis V. Aleshin
Russian Federation
Salyama Adilya st., 2, Moscow, 123423
Oksana Yu. Fomenko
Russian Federation
Salyama Adilya st., 2, Moscow, 123423
Ayrat F. Mingazov
Russian Federation
Salyama Adilya st., 2, Moscow, 123423
Yulia A. Elfimova
Russian Federation
Salyama Adilya st., 2, Moscow, 123423
Andrey V. Blagodatny
Russian Federation
Salyama Adilya st., 2, Moscow, 123423
Maria A. Ignatenko
Russian Federation
Salyama Adilya st., 2, Moscow, 123423
Dmitriy G. Shakhmatov
Russian Federation
Salyama Adilya st., 2, Moscow, 123423
Barrikadnayast., 2/1, p.1, Moscow, 125993
References
1. Parks AG, Nicholls RJ. Proctocolectomy without ileostomy for ulcerative colitis. British Medical Journal. 1978;2(6130):85–88. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.6130.85
2. Achkasov S.I., Sushkov O.I., Kulikov A.E., et al. Complications of pelvic ileal pouch in patients operated on for ulcerative colitis. Koloproktologia. 2017;61:73a. (in Russ.).
3. Fazio V.W., Kiran R.P., Remzi F.H. et al. Ileal pouch anal anastomosis: analysis of outcome and quality of life in 3707 patients. Annals of Surgery. 2013. Vol. 257 (4). P. 679–685. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31827d99a2
4. Kashnikov V.N., Achkasov S.I., Bolikhov K.V., et al. Results of primary and secondary ileal pouch formation in ulcerative colitis. Russian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Coloproctology. 2014;6:73–77. (in Russ.).
5. Lovegrove RE, Fazio VW, Remzi FH, et al. Development of a pouch functional score following restorative proctocolectomy. British Journal of Surgery. 2010. Vol. 97 (6). P. 945–951.10.1002/bjs.7021
6. Hahnloser D, Pemberton JH, Wolff BG, et al. The effect of ageing on function and quality of life in ileal pouch patients. Annals of Surgery. 2004;240(4):615–621. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000141157.32234.9d
7. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care. 1992;30(6):473–483.
8. Wexner SD, Jorge JM. Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum. 1993;36(1):77–97. doi: 10.1007/BF02050307
9. Achkasov S.I., Vardanyan A.V., Binnatli Sh.A., et al. Comparative assessment of quality of life in patients operated on for ulcerative colitis. Surgery. Journal named after N.I. Pirogov. 2020;7:18–24. (in Russ.). doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.02163.x
10. Amirdzhanova V.N., Goryachev D.V., Korshunov N.I., et al. Population indicators of quality of life according to the SF-36 questionnaire (results of the multicenter MIRAGE study). Scientific and Practical Rheumatology. 2008;1:36–48. (in Russ.). doi: 10.14412/1995-4484-2008-852
11. Tulchinsky N, Dotan I, Halpern Z, et al. A longitudinal study of quality of life and functional outcome of patients with ulcerative colitis after proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum. 2010;53(6):866–873. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.02163.x
12. Andersson T, Lunde OC, Johnson E, et al. Long-term functional outcome and quality of life after restorative proctocolectomy with ileo-anal anastomosis for colitis. Colorectal Disease. 2011;13(4):431– 437. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.02163.x
Review
For citations:
Kalanov B.R., Sushkov O.I., Aleshin D.V., Fomenko O.Yu., Mingazov A.F., Elfimova Yu.A., Blagodatny A.V., Ignatenko M.A., Shakhmatov D.G. Late outcomes of J-pouch in patients after proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis. Koloproktologia. 2026;25(1):48-54. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33878/2073-7556-2026-25-1-48-54
JATS XML































