Effectiveness of artificial intelligence's system ArtInCol in diagnostic of colorectal neoplasia during colonoscopy: results of multicenter randomised clinical trial
https://doi.org/10.33878/2073-7556-2025-24-3-12-21
Abstract
AIM: to evaluate the effectiveness of the Russian artificial intelligence system ArtInCol during routine colonoscopy.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: from August to December 2024 a multicenter randomized trial was done and included 4 medical institutions and 1,128 patients. The patients were randomized into colonoscopy groups without AI (n = 547) and colonoscopy group using the ArtInCol artificial intelligence system (n = 581). The data was analyzed according to the “intention-to-treat” and «per protocol» types, with the primary endpoint being the frequency of detection of adenomas.
RESULTS: the randomized groups were homogenous in all analyzed variables. When comparing the primary end-point, the detection rate of adenomas (ADR) in the studied group of AI-assisted colonoscopy was 47.2% (95% CI: 43.1–51.2), compared with 41.3% (95% CI: 37.3–45.5) without AI, the effect value was 5.9%, p = 0.048. The average number of detected adenomas was 0.97 (95% CI: 0.85–1.09), versus 0.79 (95% CI: 0.67–0.92) in the control group, which is a statistically significant difference (p = 0.01).
CONCLUSION: the study confirm the hypothesis of the effectiveness of the AI — ArtInCol system in order to improve the quality of neoplasm detection during colonoscopy. An increase in the detection rate of adenomas by 5.9% was recorded.
About the Authors
S. I. AchkasovRussian Federation
Sergey I. Achkasov.
Salyama Adilya st., 2, Moscow, 123423; Barrikadnaya st., 2/1, Moscow, 125993
Yu. A. Shelygin
Russian Federation
Yuri A. Shelygin.
Salyama Adilya st., 2, Moscow, 123423; Barrikadnaya st., 2/1, Moscow, 125993
A. V. Shabunin
Russian Federation
Aleksey V. Shabunin.
Salyama Adilya st., 2, Moscow, 123423; Barrikadnaya st., 2/1, Moscow, 125993
I. Yu. Korzheva
Russian Federation
Irina Yu. Korzheva.
Barrikadnaya st., 2/1, Moscow, 125993; 2nd Botkinsky passage, 5, Moscow, 125284
E. D. Fedorov
Russian Federation
Evgeniy D. Fedorov.
Ostrovitianova st., 1, Moscow, 117321
Yu. Yu. Kamaletdinova
Russian Federation
Yuliya Yu. Kamaletdinova.
Oktyabrya Avenue, 73/1, Ufa, 450054
D. G. Shakhmatov
Russian Federation
Dmitriy G. Shakhmatov.
Salyama Adilya st., 2, Moscow, 123423; Barrikadnaya st., 2/1, Moscow, 125993
A. A. Likutov
Russian Federation
Alexey A. Likutov.
Salyama Adilya st., 2, Moscow, 123423
I. V. Nazarov
Russian Federation
Ilya V. Nazarov.
Salyama Adilya st., 2, Moscow, 123423
A. F. Mingazov
Russian Federation
Airat F. Mingazov.
Salyama Adilya st., 2, Moscow, 123423
E. V. Gorbachev
Russian Federation
Evgeniy V. Gorbachev.
Ostrovitianova st., 1, Moscow, 117321
References
1. Jahn B, Bundo M, Arvandi M, et al. One in three adenomas could be missed by white-light colonoscopy — findings from a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC gastroenterology. 2025;25(1):170.
2. Wieszczy P, Regula J, Kaminski MF. Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer. Best Practice & Research. Clinical Gastroenterology. 2017;31(4):441–446.
3. Kaminski MF, Wieszczy P, Rupinski M, et al. Increased Rate of Adenoma Detection Associates With Reduced Risk of Colorectal Cancer and Death. Gastroenterology. 2017;153(1):98–105.
4. Mtvralashvili D.A., Shakhmatov D.G., Likutov A.A., et al. AI-based algorithm for clinical decision support system in colonoscopy. Koloproktologia. 2023;22(2):92–102. (In Russ.). doi: 10.33878/2073-7556-2023-22-2-92-102
5. Achkasov S.I., Shelygin Yu.A., Likutov A.A., et al. The effectiveness of endoscopic diagnostics of colon tumors using artificial intelligence: prospective tandem study. Koloproktologia. 2024;23(2):28–34. (In Russ.). doi: 10.33878/2073-7556-2024-23-2-28-34
6. CONSORT 2025 Statement: Updated Guideline for Reporting Randomized Trials. Guidelines. JAMA Network. URL: https://jama-network.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2832868 (дата обращения: 20.04.2025).
7. Reporting guidelines for clinical trial reports for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the CONSORT-AI extension | Nature Medicine. URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-020-1034-x (дата обращения: 20.04.2025).
8. Liu J, Zhou R, Liu C, et al. Automatic Quality Control System and Adenoma Detection Rates During Routine Colonoscopy: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Network Open. 2025;8(1):e2457241–e2457241.
9. Soleymanjahi S, Huebner J, Elmansy L, R, et al. Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Colonoscopy for Polyp Detection : A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2024;177-(12):1652–1663.
10. Lou S, Du F, Song W, et al. Artificial intelligence for colorectal neoplasia detection during colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. E Clinical Medicine. 2023;66:102341.
11. Rizkala T, Hassan C, Mori Y, et al. Accuracy of Computer-aided Diagnosis in Colonoscopy Varies According to Polyp Location: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology: The Official Clinical Practice Journal of the American Gastroenterological Association. 2025;23(4):531–541.
12. Maida M, Marasco G, Maas MHJ, et al. Effectiveness of artificial intelligence assisted colonoscopy on adenoma and polyp miss rate: A meta-analysis of tandem RCTs. Digestive and Liver Disease: Official Journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver. 2025;57(1):169–175.
Review
For citations:
Achkasov S.I., Shelygin Yu.A., Shabunin A.V., Korzheva I.Yu., Fedorov E.D., Kamaletdinova Yu.Yu., Shakhmatov D.G., Likutov A.A., Nazarov I.V., Mingazov A.F., Gorbachev E.V. Effectiveness of artificial intelligence's system ArtInCol in diagnostic of colorectal neoplasia during colonoscopy: results of multicenter randomised clinical trial. Koloproktologia. 2025;24(3):12-21. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33878/2073-7556-2025-24-3-12-21