Parastomal hernias: the current state (review)
https://doi.org/10.33878/2073-7556-2023-22-2-141-148
Abstract
Every year there is an increase in the number of patients with intestinal stoma, which leads to an increase in the incidence of parastomal hernias (PSH). More than 50% of ostomy patients develop a parastomal hernia two or more years after radical surgery. To date, there are many surgical options for PSH, however, a unified algorithm for choosing an operational technique has not been evolved.
The purpose of this review is to study modern surgical methods for the treatment of PSH and their late results, to determine the optimal approach and benefits.
The review of the literature showed that in all cases of surgical treatment of PSH it is necessary to use mesh implants. The optimal technique for PSH hernioplasty is the laparoscopic version of Sugarbaker due to the low risk of recurrence and technical simplicity. In patients with large and giant PSH or hernia recurrence, STORRM is the technique of choice; classical stoma transposition is not used due to the high risk of recurrence. The use of Pauli/ePauli technique demonstrates a low recurrence rate, but there are no late results in this category of patients.
About the Authors
N. R. Kopteev
North-Western Regional Scientific and Clinical Center; St.Petersburg State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Nikita R. Kopteev — post-graduate student of St. Petersburg State University, surgeon of the 1st surgical department
Kultury Ave., 4, St. Petersburg, 194291, Russia
Universitetskaya nab., 7-9, St. Petersburg, 199034, Russia
T. S. Ovchinnikov
North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov”, Department of Hospital Surgery named after V.A. Oppel
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Timofey S. Ovchinnikov — Resident of the Department of Hospital Surgery named after V.A. Oppel
Piskarevsky Ave., 47, St. Petersburg, 195067, Russia
A. V. Lodygin
North-Western Regional Scientific and Clinical Center; St.Petersburg State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Alexander V. Lodygin — Candidate of Medical Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Faculty Surgery
Kultury Ave., 4, St. Petersburg, 194291, Russia
Universitetskaya nab., 7-9, St. Petersburg, 199034, Russia
A. A. Bogatikov
North-Western Regional Scientific and Clinical Center
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Alexander A. Bogatikov — Candidate of Medical Sciences, Deputy Chief Physician for Surgical Assistance
Kultury Ave., 4, St. Petersburg, 194291, Russia
V. A. Kashchenko
North-Western Regional Scientific and Clinical Center; St.Petersburg State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Viktor A. Kashchenko — Professor, Doctor of Medical Sciences, Deputy General Director for Research
Kultury Ave., 4, St. Petersburg, 194291, Russia
Universitetskaya nab., 7-9, St. Petersburg, 199034, Russia
References
1. Robert R Cima. Parastomal hernia. Up To Date. Aug 2021.
2. Antoniou SA, Agresta F, Garcia Alamino JM, et al. European Hernia Society guidelines on prevention and treatment of parastomal hernias. Hernia. 2018 Feb;22(1):183–198. doi: 10.1007/s10029-017-1697-5
3. Moreno-Matias J, et al. The prevalence of parastomal hernia after formation of an end colostomy. A new clinico-radiological classification. Colorectal Disease. 2009;11:173–77. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01564.x
4. Cingi A, Solmaz A, Attaallah W, et al. Enterostomy closure site hernias: a clinical and ultrasonographic evaluation. Hernia. 2008;12:401–05. doi: 10.1007/s10029-008-0355-3
5. Jänes A, Cengiz Y, Israelsson LA. Randomized clinical trial of the use of a prosthetic mesh to prevent parastomal hernia. Br J Surg. 2004;91:280– 82. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4417
6. Williams NS, Nair R, Bhan C. Stapled mesh stoma reinforcement technique (SMART)--a procedure to prevent parastomal herniation. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2011;93(2):169. doi: 10.1308/003588411x12851639107313c
7. Carne PWG, Robertson GM, Frizelle FA. Parastomal hernia. Br J Surg. 2003;90:784–93. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4220
8. Hardt J, Seyfried S, Weiß C, et al. A pilot single-centre randomized trial assessing the safety and efficacy of lateral pararectus abdominis compared with transrectus abdominis muscle stoma placement in patients with temporary loop ileostomies: the PATRASTOM trial. Colorectal Dis. 2016 Feb;18(2):O81-90. doi: 10.1111/codi.13251
9. López-Cano M, Brandsma HT, Bury K, et al. Prophylactic mesh to prevent parastomal hernia after end colostomy: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. Hernia. 2017 Apr;21(2):177–189. doi: 10.1007/s10029-016-1563-x
10. Reinforcement of Closure of Stoma Site (ROCSS) Collaborative and West Midlands Research Collaborative. Prophylactic biological mesh reinforcement versus standard closure of stoma site (ROCSS): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2020 Feb 8;395(10222):417–426. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32637-6
11. Odensten C, Strigård K, Rutegård J, et al. Use of Prophylactic Mesh When Creating a Colostomy Does Not Prevent Parastomal Hernia: A Randomized Controlled Trial-STOMAMESH. Ann Surg. 2019 Mar;269(3):427–431. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002542
12. Chen MZ, Gilmore A. Short-term outcomes of parastomal hernia prophylaxis with Stapled Mesh stomA Reinforcement Technique (SMART) in permanent stomas. ANZ J Surg. 2021 Jun;91(6):1185–1189. doi: 10.1111/ans.16420
13. Canda AE, Terzi C, Agalar C, et al. Preventing parastomal hernia with modified stapled mesh stoma reinforcement technique (SMART) in patients who underwent surgery for rectal cancer: a case-control study. Hernia. 2018 Apr;22(2):379–384. doi: 10.1007/s10029-017-1723-7
14. Śmietański M, Bury K, Matyja A, et al. Polish guidelines for treatment of patients with parastomal hernia. Pol Przegl Chir. 2013 Mar;85(3):152–80. doi: 10.2478/pjs-2013-0027
15. Majumder A, Orenstein SB, Miller HJ, Novitsky YW. Stapled Transabdominal Ostomy Reinforcement with retromuscular mesh (STORRM): Technical details and early outcomes of a novel approach for retromuscular repair of parastomal hernias. Am J Surg. 2018 Jan;215(1):82–87. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.07.030
16. Slater NJ, Hansson BM, Buyne OR, et al. Repair of parastomal hernias with biologic grafts: a systematic review. J Gastrointest Surg. 2011 Jul;15(7):1252–1258. doi: 10.1007/s11605-011-1435-8
17. Tandon A, Shahzad K, Pathak S, et al. Parietex™ Composite mesh versus DynaMesh®-IPOM for laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernia repair: a retrospective cohort study. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2016 Nov;98(8):568–573. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2016.0292
18. Hansson BM, Slater NJ, van der Velden AS, et al. Surgical techniques for parastomal hernia repair: a systematic review of the literature. Ann Surg. 2012 Apr;255(4):685–695. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31824b44b1
19. Sugarbaker PH. Peritoneal approach to prosthetic mesh repair of paraostomy hernias. Ann Surg. 1985;201(3):344–346. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198503000-00015
20. Hansson BM, Morales-Conde S, Mussack T, et al. The laparoscopic modified Sugarbaker technique is safe and has a low recurrence rate: a multicenter cohort study. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:494–500. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2464-4
21. Hansson BM, van Nieuwenhoven EJ, Bleichrodt RP. Promising new technique in the repair of parastomal hernia. Surg Endosc. 2003 Nov;17(11):1789–91. Epub 2003 Sep 29. PMID: 14508669. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-9249-0
22. Hansson BME, Bleichrodt RP, Hingh IH. Laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair using a keyhole technique results in a high recurrence rate. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:1456–59. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-0253-x
23. Berger D, Bientzle M. Laparoscopic repair of parastomal hernias: a single surgeon’s experience in 66 patients. Dis Colon Rectum. 2007 Oct;50(10):1668–73. doi: 10.1007/s10350-007-9028-z
24. Berger D. Laparoskopische Reparation der parastomalen- Hernie [Laparoscopic repair of parastomal hernia]. Chirurg. 2010 Nov;81(11):988–92.
25. Pauli EM, Juza RM, Winder JS. How I do it: novel parastomal herniorrhaphy utilizing transversus abdominis release. Hernia. 2016 Aug;20(4):547–52. doi: 10.1007/s10029-016-1489-3
26. Belyansky I, Reza Zahiri H, Sanford Z, et al. Early operative outcomes of endoscopic (eTEP access) robotic-assisted retromuscular abdominal wall hernia repair. Hernia. 2018 Oct;22(5):837–847. doi: 10.1007/s10029-018-1795-z
27. Jiang H, Thapa DM, Cai X, et al. Modified Laparoscopic Sugarbaker Repair of Parastomal Hernia With a Totally Extraperitoneal Technique. Front Surg. 2021 Oct 5;8:740430. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.740430
28. Jan Roland Lambrecht: Endoscopic preperitoneal parastomal hernia repair (ePauli repair): an observational study. Surg Endosc. 2021;35(4):1903–1907. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08192-1
29. Pauli EM. Parastomal herniorhaphy utilizing transversus abdominis release and modified Sugarbaker technique. The Devil is in the Details Session: Technical Tips from the Masters — Ventral Hernia held during the 2017 SAGES Annual Meeting in Houston, TX on Wednesday, March 22, 2017.
Supplementary files
Review
For citations:
Kopteev N.R., Ovchinnikov T.S., Lodygin A.V., Bogatikov A.A., Kashchenko V.A. Parastomal hernias: the current state (review). Koloproktologia. 2023;22(2):141-148. https://doi.org/10.33878/2073-7556-2023-22-2-141-148
Views:
1868
Email this article 
