Preview

Koloproktologia

Advanced search

Pouch failure in patients with ulcerative colitis

https://doi.org/10.33878/2073-7556-2022-21-3-10-18

Abstract

AIM: to assess results of pouch surgery for ulcerative colitis (UC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS: the retrospective single-center study included 144 patients who underwent J-pouch surgery in 2011–2018 (4 patients refused ileostomy closure due to nonmedical reasons and were excluded from analysis). Median follow-up was 32 (20; 43) months. The definition of «pouch failure» (PF) was clarified as a condition, when J-pouch associated complications do not permit ileostomy closure ≥ 12 months or more after pouch surgery.

RESULTS: PF was detected in 30/140 (21.4%) cases and only in 8/140 (5,7%) patients pouch was removed. The most common complication identified by PF was pouch fistula, which was detected in 16/30 (53.3%) patients. Of the 30 patients with PF, 22 (73.3%) managed to “save” the pouch, of which — in 11/30 (36.7%) cases, anal defecation was restored, and in other cases — 11 (36. 7%) the ileostomy was not closed, but the pouch was preserved and is being treated conservatively. In 9/30 (30%) patients, the identified complications were performed by transanal removal of the remaining part of the rectum with the formation of a pouch-anal anastomosis, followed by closure of the ileostomy. In 8/30 (26.6%) cases pouch was removed. The multivariant analysis revealed hypoalbuminemia at the time of pouch surgery (OR = 5.74; 95% CI = 1.83–18.01; p = 0.003) as independent risk factors for PF.

CONCLUSION: the only independent risk factor for complications which lead to PF was hypoalbuminemia. Multi-stage surgical treatment of complications associated with the pouch made it possible to “save” the ileal pouch in 22/30 (73.3%) cases, and completely overcome PF and restore anal defecation in 11/30 (36.7%) cases. In 8/140 (5.7%) patients, the pouch had to be removed and a permanent ileostomy was done.

About the Authors

S. I. Achkasov
Ryzhikh National Medical Research Center of Coloproctology
Russian Federation

Sergey I. Achkasov

Salyama Adilya str., 2, Moscow, 123423



A. E. Kulikov
Clinical Hospital “Lapino” of the “Mother and Child” Group of companies
Russian Federation

Kulikov Artur Eduardovich

1st Uspenskoe Shosse, 111, Lapino, Moscow region 143081
tel.: +7 (916) 477-63-40



A. F. Mingazov
Ryzhikh National Medical Research Center of Coloproctology
Russian Federation

Airat F. Mingazov

Salyama Adilya str., 2, Moscow, 123423



A. V. Vardanyan
Ryzhikh National Medical Research Center of Coloproctology
Russian Federation

Armen V. Vardanyan

Salyama Adilya str., 2, Moscow, 123423



D. V. Aleshin
Ryzhikh National Medical Research Center of Coloproctology
Russian Federation

Denis V. Aleshin

Salyama Adilya str., 2, Moscow, 123423



E. S. Surovegin
Ryzhikh National Medical Research Center of Coloproctology
Russian Federation

Evgenii S. Surovegin

Salyama Adilya str., 2, Moscow, 123423



D. G. Shahmatov
Ryzhikh National Medical Research Center of Coloproctology
Russian Federation

Dmitriy G. Shahmatov

Salyama Adilya str., 2, Moscow, 123423



O. I. Sushkov
Ryzhikh National Medical Research Center of Coloproctology
Russian Federation

Oleg I. Sushkov

Salyama Adilya str., 2, Moscow, 123423



References

1. Parks AG, Nicholls RJ. Proctocolectomy without ileostomy for ulcerative colitis. British medical journal. 1978;2:85–8.

2. Andersson P, Söderholm JD. Surgery in ulcerative colitis: indication and timing. Digestive diseases (Basel, Switzerland). 2009;27:335–40. doi: 10.1159/000228570

3. Lovegrove RE, Heriot AG, Constantinides V, Tilney HS, et al. Meta-analysis of short-term and long-term outcomes of J, W and S ileal reservoirs for restorative proctocolectomy. Colorectal Disease. 2007;9:310–20. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2006.01093.x

4. Shelygin Yu.A., Kashnikov V.N., Sushkov O.I., Gusev A.V., et al. Small intestinal reservoirs in the rehabilitation of patients with ulcerative colitis. Koloproktologia. 2014;49:50–6. (in Russ.).

5. Alexander F. Complications of ileal pouch anal anastomosis. Seminars in pediatric surgery. 2007;16:200–4. doi: 10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2007.04.009

6. Achkasov S.I., Sushkov O.I., Kulikov A.E., Binnatli S.A., et al. Risk factors for the development of complications of pelvic small intestinal reservoirs in patients with ulcerative colitis. Koloproktologia. 2020;19:51–66. (in Russ.). doi: 10.33878/2073-7556-2020-19-1-51-66

7. Sherman J, Greenstein AJ, Greenstein AJ. Ileal j pouch complications and surgical solutions: a review. Inflammatory bowel diseases. 2014;20:1678–85. doi: 10.1097/MIB.0000000000000086

8. Binnatli Sh.A., Aleshin D.V., Kulikov A.E., Romanov R.I. Quality of life of patients operated on for ulcerative colitis (literature review). Koloproktologia. 2019;18(1):89–100. (in Russ.). doi: 10.33878/2073-2016;10:766–72. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjw069

9. Alsafi Z, Snell A, Segal JP. Prevalence of «pouch failure» of the ileoanal pouch in ulcerative colitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. International journal of colorectal disease. 2021. doi: 10.1007/S00384-021-04067-6

10. Zittan E, Wong-Chong N, Ma GW, McLeod RS, Silverberg MS, Cohen Z. Modified two-stage ileal pouch-anal anastomosis results in lower rate of anastomotic leak compared with traditional two-stage surgery for ulcerative colitis. Journal of Crohn’s and Colitis. 2016;10:766–72. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjw069

11. Nisar PJ, Kiran RP, Shen B, Remzi FH, Fazio VW. Factors Associated With Ileoanal Pouch Failure in Patients Developing Early or Late Pouch-Related Fistula. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. 2011;54:446–53. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e318206ea42

12. Mark-Christensen A, Erichsen R, Brandsborg S, Pachler FR, Nørager CB, Johansen N, идр. Pouch failures following ileal pouch–anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis. Colorectal Disease. 2018;20:44–52. doi: 10.1111/codi.13802

13. Leowardi C, Hinz U, Tariverdian M, Kienle P, et al. Long-term outcome 10 years or more after restorative proctocolectomy and ileal pouch–anal anastomosis in patients with ulcerative colitis. Langenbeck’s Archives of Surgery. 2010;395:49–56. doi: 10.1007/s00423-009-0479-7

14. Helavirta I, Lehto K, Huhtala H, Hyöty M, et al. Pouch failures following restorative proctocolectomy in ulcerative colitis. International journal of colorectal disease. 2020;35:2027–33. doi: 10.1007/S00384-020-03680-1

15. Alsafi Z, Snell A, Segal JP. Prevalence of «pouch failure» of the ileoanal pouch in ulcerative colitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. International journal of colorectal disease. 2021. doi: 10.1007/S00384-021-04067-6

16. Meagher AP, Farouk R, Dozois RR, Kelly KA, et el. J ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis: complications and long-term outcome in 1310 patients. The British journal of surgery. 1998;85:800–3. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00689.x

17. Ishii H, Kawai K, Hata K, Shuno Y, Nishikawa T, et al. Comparison of functional outcomes of patients who underwent hand-sewn or stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis. International Surgery. 2015;100:1169–76. doi: 10.9738/INTSURG-D-15-00012.1

18. Forbes SS, O’Connor BI, Charles Victor J, Cohen Z, et al. Sepsis is a major predictor of failure after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum. 2009;52:1975–81. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181beb3f0


Review

For citations:


Achkasov S.I., Kulikov A.E., Mingazov A.F., Vardanyan A.V., Aleshin D.V., Surovegin E.S., Shahmatov D.G., Sushkov O.I. Pouch failure in patients with ulcerative colitis. Koloproktologia. 2022;21(3):10-18. https://doi.org/10.33878/2073-7556-2022-21-3-10-18

Views: 967


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-7556 (Print)
ISSN 2686-7303 (Online)