Safety of the total neo-adjuvant therapy in rectal cancer treatment. Preliminary results of the randomized trial
https://doi.org/10.33878/2073-7556-2022-21-3-76-84
Abstract
AIM: assess tolerability and safety of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) with three consolidation courses of XELOX for patients with rectal carcinoma.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: patients with histologically proven rectal carcinoma were randomly assigned in two groups: in the TNT group after the neoadjuvant CRT 50–54 Gy with capecitabine 3 consolidation courses of XELOX were done, in the CTR group — conventional neoadjuvant CRT 50–54 Gy with capecitabine. The RTOG scale was used to assessed radial reactions, and the NCI-CTC v5.0 scale was used to evaluate toxicity. For selected patients with a complete clinical response «watch and wait» approach was used. Postoperative complications were graded according with the Clavien-Dindo scale. The primary endpoint of study was the complete response rate (clinical and pathomorphological). Secondary endpoints of study: frequency and structure of intraoperative and postoperative complications, the rate of grade 3–4 toxicity of radiotherapy and chemotherapy, R0-resection rates. The study was registered on the ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04747951).
RESULTS: between October 2020 and March 2022, 145 patients were enrolled in the randomized study: 72 patients in the TNT group and 73 patients in the CRT group. The full course of neoadjuvant treatment was completed in 90% patients in the TNT group, comparing with 96% in the CRT group (p = 0.65). The total rate of severe adverse effects of radiation therapy was 59% in the TNT group, comparing with 67% in the CRT group (p = 0.48), with 3–4 grade by RTOG scale were observed only in two cases in the CRT group. During chemotherapy severe adverse effects were observed in 54% in the TNT group comparing with 19% in the CRT group (p < 0.001). Grade 3–4 toxicity was 3% in the TNT group comparing with 2% in the CRT group. The rate of intra- and postoperative complications did not differ between two groups.
CONCLUSION: TNT is a safe alternative to conventional CRT.
About the Authors
S. I. SychevRussian Federation
Sergey I. Sychev
Salyama Adilya str., 2, Moscow, 123423
S. V. Chernyshov
Russian Federation
Stanislav V. Chernyshov
Salyama Adilya str., 2, Moscow, 123423
A. I. Arzamastseva
Russian Federation
Anna I. Arzamastseva
Salyama Adilya str., 2, Moscow, 123423
M. V. Panina
Russian Federation
Maria V. Panina
Kashirskoe shosse, 23, Moscow, 115478Salyama Adilya str., 2, Moscow, 123423
M. V. Chernykh
Russian Federation
Marina V. Chernykh
Kashirskoe shosse, 23, Moscow, 115478
E. A. Petukhov
Russian Federation
Evgeny A. Petukhov
Kashirskoe shosse, 23, Moscow, 115478
Hospitalnaya pl., 3, Moscow, 105094
E. G. Rybakov
Russian Federation
Evgeny G. Rybakov
References
1. Gollins S, Sebag-Montefiore D. Neoadjuvant Treatment Strategies for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer. Clin Oncol. 2016;28(2):146–151.
2. Bosset J-F, et al. Chemotherapy with Preoperative Radiotherapy in Rectal Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(11):1114–1123.
3. Hattori N, et al. Phase II study of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CapOX) as adjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer (CORONA II). Int J Clin Oncol. Springer Singapore. 2020;25(1):118–125.
4. Sandra-Petrescu F, et al. Influence of complete administration of adjuvant chemotherapy cycles on overall and disease-free survival in locally advanced rectal cancer: Post hoc analysis of a randomized, multicenter, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial. BMC Cancer. 2018;18(1) 4–11.
5. Martin ST, Heneghan HM, Winter DC. Systematic review and metaAnalysis of outcomes following pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2012;99(7):918–928.
6. Zorcolo L, et al. Complete pathologic response after combined modality treatment for rectal cancer and long-term survival: A meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(9):2822–2832.
7. Cox JD, Stetz JA, Pajak TF. Toxicity criteria of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and the European organization for research and treatment of cancer (EORTC). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995;31(5):1341–1346.
8. Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program (CTEP). Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE).v.5.0 [5x7]. Cancer Ther Eval Progr. 2017; p.155.
9. Yoen H, et al. Prognostic value of tumor regression grade on MR in rectal cancer: A large-scale, single-center experience. Korean J Radiol. 2020;21(9):1065–1076.
10. Heald RJ, et al. Rectal cancer: the Basingstoke experience of total mesorectal excision, 1978-1997. Arch Surg United States. 1998;133(8):894–899.
11. Campa-Thompson M, et al. Pathologic processing of the total mesorectal excision. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2015;28(1):43–52.
12. Amin MB, et al. The Eighth Edition AJCC Cancer Staging Manual: Continuing to build a bridge from a population-based to a more “personalized” approach to cancer staging. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians United States. 2017;67(2):93–99.
13. Ryan JE, et al. Assessing pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: a systematic review. Color Dis Off J Assoc Coloproctology Gt Britain Irel England. 2015;17(10):849–861.
14. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205–213.
15. Rahbari NN, et al. Definition and grading of anastomotic leakage following anterior resection of the rectum: a proposal by the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer. Surgery United States. 2010;147(3):339–351.
16. Rectal cancer. Clinical guidelines. Russian Society of Clinical Oncology, Association of Oncologists of Russia, Russian Society of Specialists in Colorectal Cancer, All-Russian Public Organization “Association of Coloproctologists of Russia.” 2020; p. 78. (in Russ.).
17. Kuebler JP, et al. Oxaliplatin combined with weekly bolus fluorouracil and leucovorin as surgical adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II and III colon cancer: Results from NSABP C-07. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(16):2198–2204.
18. André T, et al. Improved overall survival with oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as adjuvant treatment in stage II or III colon cancer in the MOSAIC trial. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(19):3109–3116.
19. Bosset JF, et al. Fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy after preoperative chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer: Long-term results of the EORTC 22921 randomised study. Lancet Oncol. Elsevier Ltd. 2014;15(2):184–190.
20. Sainato A, et al. No benefit of adjuvant Fluorouracil Leucovorin chemotherapy after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced cancer of the rectum (LARC): Long term results of a randomized trial (I-CNR-RT). Radiother Oncol Elsevier Ireland Ltd. 2014;113(2):223–229.
21. Collette L, et al. Patients with curative resection of cT3-4 rectal cancer after preoperative radiotherapy or radiochemotherapy: Does anybody benefit from adjuvant fluorouracil-based chemotherapy? A trial of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Rad. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(28):4379–4386.
22. Chakrabarti D, et al. Short-course radiotherapy with consolidation chemotherapy versus conventionally fractionated long-course chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: Randomized clinical trial. Br J Surg. 2021;108(5):511–520.
23. Maréchal R, et al. Short course chemotherapy followed by concomitant chemoradiotherapy and surgery in locally advanced rectal cancer: A randomized multicentric phase II study. Ann Oncol. 2012;23(6):1525–1530.
24. Bahadoer RR, et al. Short-course radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy before total mesorectal excision (TME) versus preoperative chemoradiotherapy, TME, and optional adjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer (RAPIDO): a randomised, openlabel, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2021;22(1):29–42.
25. Kim SY, et al. A Randomized Phase 2 Trial of Consolidation Chemotherapy After Preoperative Chemoradiation Therapy Versus Chemoradiation Therapy Alone for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: KCSG CO 14-03. Int J Radiat. Oncol Biol Phys Elsevier Inc. 2018;101(4):889–899.
26. Conroy T, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with FOLFIRINOX and preoperative chemoradiotherapy for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (UNICANCER-PRODIGE 23): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2021;22(5):702–715.
27. Moore J, Price T, Carruthers S, et al. Prospective Randomised Trial Of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy During The “Wait Period” Following Pre-Operative Chemoradiotherapy For Rectal Cancer; Results of the WAIT trial. Int J Lab Hematol. 2017;38(1):42–49.
28. Garcia-Aguilar J, et al. Effect of adding mFOLFOX6 after neoadjuvant chemoradiation in locally advanced rectal cancer: A multicentre, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol Elsevier Ltd. 2015;16(8):957–966.
29. Fokas E, et al. Randomized phase II trial of chemoradiotherapy plus induction or consolidation chemotherapy as total neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: CAO/ArO/AIO-12. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37(34):3212–3222.
Review
For citations:
Sychev S.I., Chernyshov S.V., Arzamastseva A.I., Panina M.V., Chernykh M.V., Petukhov E.A., Rybakov E.G. Safety of the total neo-adjuvant therapy in rectal cancer treatment. Preliminary results of the randomized trial. Koloproktologia. 2022;21(3):76-84. https://doi.org/10.33878/2073-7556-2022-21-3-76-84