INTRAABDOMINAL AND TRANSANAL VACUUM DRAINAGE FOR COLORECTAL ANASTOMOSIS LEAKAGE (case report)
https://doi.org/10.33878/2073-7556-2020-19-4-100-106
Abstract
AIM: to present a clinical case of treatment of colorectal anastomosis leakage complicated by secondary diffuse postoperative peritonitis with preservation of the anastomosis.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: the patient was a 69-year-old male, with a diagnosis of the rectal cancer pT3N0M0, after surgery treatment (laparoscopic TME, ileostomy). The postoperative period was complicated by anastomosis leakage.
RESULTS: we applied the method of surgical treatment, which included stage relaparotomy without resection of anastomosis with installing intraabdominal and pelvic system of negative pressure treatment and transanal endoluminal vacuum drainage at the anastomotic leakage site.
CONCLUSION: the primary use of the method gave us encouraging results, which enables to consider the proposed technical approach as a promising option for treatment of such a complicated group of patients.
About the Authors
I. B. UvarovRussian Federation
Researcher ID: A-4192-2014
тел.: +7(918)4825060
Mitrofan Sedin str., 4, Krasnodar, 350063, Russia
Dimitrov Str. 146, 350040, Krasnodar, Russia
A. M. Manuylov
Russian Federation
+7(861)252-14-60
Mitrofan Sedin str., 4, Krasnodar, 350063, Russia
D. D. Sichinava
Russian Federation
+7(918)4910385
Mitrofan Sedin str., 4, Krasnodar, 350063, Russia
Dimitrov Str. 146, 350040, Krasnodar, Russia
References
1. Kit O.I., Gevorkyan Y.A., Soldatkina N.V., et. al. Stapling interintestinal anastomosis in colorectal cancer: short-term results. Koloproktologia. 2016; no. 1, pp. 48-53. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.33878/2073-7556-2016-0-1-48-53
2. Kanellos I, Vasiliadis K, Angelopoulos S, et al. Anastomotic leakage following anterior resection for rectal cancer. Tech Coloproctol. 2004,8(suppl 1):79-81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-004-0119-8
3. Polovinkin V.V., Porkhanov V.A., Khmelik S.V., et. al. Preventive stoma after low anterior resection of the rectum: im-proving the results or being overcautious? Koloproktologia. 2016; no. 1, pp. 16-21. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.33878/2073-7556-2016-0-1-16-21
4. Malcov I.S., Filippov V.A., Korobkov V.N., et. al. Generalized peritonitis: evolution of surgical treatment methods. Practical medicine. 2017; no. 6 (107), pp. 46-49. (In Russ.).
5. Sinenchenko G.I.,.Peregudov S.I. Hospital infection in patients with diffuse peritonitis. Infections in surgery. 2009; no. 3, pp. 40-42. (in Russ.)
6. Blumetti J, &Abcarian H. Management of low colorectal anastomotic leak: Preserving the anastomosis. World journal of gastrointestinal surgery. 2015; 7(12), 378–383. https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v7.i12.378
7. Kulu Y, Ulrich A, Bruckner T, Contin P, et al. Validation of the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer definition and severity grading of anastomotic leakage. Surgery. 2013;153(6):753-761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2013.02.007
8. Akhmetzyanov F.Sh., Egorov V.I., Fomin A.I., et. al. Prognostic Model of Colorectal Anastomosis Sutures Failure. News of surgery. 2018; no. 26 (6), pp. 707-714. (in Russ.).
9. Lindgren R, Hallböök O, Rutegård J, Sjödahl R, et al. What is the risk for a permanent stoma after low anterior resection of the rectum for cancer? A six-year follow-up of a multicenter trial. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011;54:41–47.
10. Wallace B, Schuepbach F, Gaukel S, Marwan AI, et al. Evidence according to Cochrane Systematic Reviews on Alterable Risk Factors for Anastomotic Leakage in Colorectal Surgery. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2020;2020:9057963. Published 2020 Jan 3. doi:10.1155/2020/9057963
11. Fraccalvieri D, Biondo S, Saez J, Millan M, et al. Management of colorectal anastomotic leakage: Differences between salvage and anastomotic takedown. Am J Surg. 2012;204(5):671-676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.04.022
12. Khan AA, Wheeler JMD, Cunningham C, et al. The management and outcome of anastomotic leaks in colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis. 2008;10(6):587-592. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2007.01417.x
13. Wu S-W, Ma C-C, Yang Y. Role of protective stoma in low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(47):18031-18037. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i47.18031
14. Shelygin Yu.A., Nagudov M.A., Ponomarenko A.A. et al. Metaanalysis of management of colorectal anastomotic leakage. Khirurgiia (Mosk). 2018; no. 8. vyp. 2, pp. 30-41. (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia201808230
15. Saur NM, Paulson EC. Operative Management of Anastomotic Leaks after Colorectal Surgery. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2019;32(3):190-195. doi:10.1055/s-0038-1677025
16. Thomas MS, Margolin DA. Management of Colorectal Anastomotic Leak. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2016;29(2):138-144. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1580630
17. Mussetto A, Arena R, Buzzi A, et al. Long-term efficacy of vacuum-assisted therapy (Endo-SPONGE®) in large anastomotic leakages following anterior rectal resection. Ann Gastroenterol. 2017;30(6):649-653. doi: 10.20524/aog.2017.0194
18. Clifford RE, Fowler H, Govindarajah N, Vimalachandran D, et al. Early anastomotic complications in colorectal surgery: a systematic review of techniques for endoscopic salvage. Surg Endosc. 2019;33(4):1049-1065. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06670-9
19. Shalaby M, Emile S, Elfeki H, Sakr A, et al. Systematic review of endoluminal vacuum-assisted therapy as salvage treatment for rectal anastomotic leakage. BJS Open. 2018;3(2):153-160. Published 2018 Dec 26. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50124
20. Abdominal surgery. National guidelines: short edition / Ed. I.I.Zatevakhina, A.I. Kirienko, V.A.Kubyshkina. M.: GEOTAR-Media, 912 p. (in Russ.).
21. Emergency Abdominal Surgery: A Methodological Guide for a Practitioner / Ed. acad. RAS Zatevakhin I.I., acad. RAS Kirienko A.I., corresponding member RAS Sazhin A.V. M .: LLC "Medical Information Agency", 2018; 488 p. (in Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Uvarov I.B., Manuylov A.M., Sichinava D.D. INTRAABDOMINAL AND TRANSANAL VACUUM DRAINAGE FOR COLORECTAL ANASTOMOSIS LEAKAGE (case report). Koloproktologia. 2020;19(4):100-106. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33878/2073-7556-2020-19-4-100-106