PRIMARY EXPERIENCE OF NATURAL ORIFICE SPECIMEN EXTRACTION SURGERY (NOSES) FOR RECTAL CANCER
https://doi.org/10.33878/2073-7556-2020-19-2-69-82
Abstract
AIM: to demonstrate the first results of natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) for rectal cancer.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: in the period from June 2019 to October 2019 five NOSES for rectal cancer were performed in the hospital. The following factors were evaluated: age, gender, BMI, ASA, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative and postoperative complications, duration of postoperative rehabilitation, need for narcotic analgesics.
RESULTS: mean age of patients was 61.2 years. Mean BMI was 25.9 kg/m2 . Mean ASA score was 2. Mean operative time was 225 minutes. Mean intraoperative blood loss was 45 ml. One intraoperative complication occurred – defect of anastomosis in the point of crossing of 3 stapler sutures. One postoperative complication occurred – postoperative ileus. Narcotic analgesics were not used. Mean duration of postoperative stay was 9.8 days. The primary results demonstrate feasibility of NOSES for rectal cancer with adequate qualification of colorectal surgeon.
CONCLUSION: NOSES is a promising technique for rectal cancer surgery. However, the further experience and randomized trials are required.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: in the period from June 2019 to October 2019 five NOSES for rectal cancer were performed in the hospital. The following factors were evaluated: age, gender, BMI, ASA, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative and postoperative complications, duration of postoperative rehabilitation, need for narcotic analgesics.
RESULTS: mean age of patients was 61.2 years. Mean BMI was 25.9 kg/m2 . Mean ASA score was 2. Mean operative time was 225 minutes. Mean intraoperative blood loss was 45 ml. One intraoperative complication occurred – defect of anastomosis in the point of crossing of 3 stapler sutures. One postoperative complication occurred – postoperative ileus. Narcotic analgesics were not used. Mean duration of postoperative stay was 9.8 days. The primary results demonstrate feasibility of NOSES for rectal cancer with adequate qualification of colorectal surgeon.
CONCLUSION: NOSES is a promising technique for rectal cancer surgery. However, the further experience and randomized trials are required.
About the Authors
D. K. Puchkov
Ryazan State Medical University; Ryazan State Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation
Ryazan
Russian Federation
Ryazan
D. A. Khubezov
Ryazan State Medical University; Ryazan State Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation
Ryazan
Russian Federation
Ryazan
I. S. Ignatov
Ryazan State Medical University; Ryazan State Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation
International str., 3A, Ryazan, 390039
tel.: +7 (906) 544-01-52
Russian Federation
International str., 3A, Ryazan, 390039
tel.: +7 (906) 544-01-52
A. Y. Ogoreltsev
Ryazan State Medical University; Ryazan State Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation
Ryazan
Russian Federation
Ryazan
R. V. Lukanin
Ryazan State Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation
Ryazan
Russian Federation
Ryazan
M. A. Evsiukova
Ryazan State Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation
Ryazan
Russian Federation
Ryazan
Y. B. Li
Ryazan State Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation
Ryazan
Russian Federation
Ryazan
A. R. Krotkov
Ryazan State Medical University
Russian Federation
Ryazan
Russian Federation
Ryazan
References
1. Jayne DG, Thorpe HC, Copeland J et al. Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. British journal of surgery. 2010; 97(11):1638-1645. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7160.
2. Stevenson AR, Solomon MJ, Lumley JW et al. Effect of laparoscopic-assisted resection vs open resection on pathological outcomes in rectal cancer: the ALaCaRT randomized clinical trial . JAMA. 2015;314(13): 1356-1363.
3. Wang XS. Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery. Berlin: Springer. 2018;230 p. doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-0466-8.
4. Puchkov K.V., Khubezov D.A., Puchkov D.R. et al. Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with specimen extraction according to nose method. Novosti Khirurgii. 2016; no. 24 (5), pp. 519-524. doi: 10.18484/2305-0047.2016.4.519. (in Russ).
5. Chernikovskiy I.L., Smirnov A.A., Savanovich N.V. Laparoscopic colorectal surgery with natural orifice specimen extraction (nose): single centre experience. Practical oncology. 2018; no. 24(5), pp. 129-137. (in Russ).
6. Efetov SK, Tulina IA, Kim VD. et al. Natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) surgery with rectal eversion and total extraabdominal resection. Techniques in coloproctology. 2019; 23:899. doi: 10.1007/s10151-019-02058-y.
7. Hara M, Takayama S, Sato M et al. Laparoscopic anterior resection for colorectal cancer without minilaparotomy using transanal bowel reversing retrieval. Surgical Laparoscopy Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques. 2011; 21(5):e235-e238. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3182297667.
8. Franklin ME, Ramos R, Rosenthal D et al. Laparoscopic colonic procedures. World journal of surgery. 1993; 17(1):51-56.
9. Liu RJ, Zhang CD, Fan YC et al. Safety and Oncological Outcomes of Laparoscopic NOSE Surgery Compared With Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Diseases: A Meta-Analysis. Front. Oncol. 2019; 9:597. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00597.
Review
For citations:
Puchkov D.K., Khubezov D.A., Ignatov I.S., Ogoreltsev A.Y., Lukanin R.V., Evsiukova M.A., Li Y.B., Krotkov A.R. PRIMARY EXPERIENCE OF NATURAL ORIFICE SPECIMEN EXTRACTION SURGERY (NOSES) FOR RECTAL CANCER. Koloproktologia. 2020;19(2):69-82. https://doi.org/10.33878/2073-7556-2020-19-2-69-82
Views:
747
Email this article 
