Preview

Koloproktologia

Advanced search

BOTULINUM TOXIN TYPE A AND LATERAL SUBCUTANEOUS SPHINCTEROTOMY FOR CHRONIC ANAL FISSURE WITH THE SPHINCTER SPASM. WHAT TO CHOOSE? (systematic literature review and meta-analysis)

https://doi.org/10.33878/2073-7556-2020-19-2-113-128

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: for the treatment of chronic anal fissure, various surgical techniques are used, the main difference between which is the method of eliminating the anal sphincter spasm. One of the most serious postoperative complications is the development of anal incontinence. To date, there are a number of methods for drug-induced relaxation of the internal sphincter, which can significantly reduce the risk of developing anal incontinence after surgery.
AIM: to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of botulinum toxin type A (BTA) and lateral subcutaneous sphincterotomy (LSS) in the treatment of chronic anal fissure with sphincter spasm.
METHODS: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 7 selected randomized clinical trials comparing the results of treatment of chronic anal fissure using BTA and LSS was performed. The results of treatment of 489 patients were analyzed with an assessment of the following indicators: the incidence of epithelization of fissures, postoperative complications, development of anal incontinence and the disease recurrence.
RESULTS: In the BTA group, the incidence of fissure epithelization is 0.88 times lower than in the LSS group (OR=0.12; CI=0.06;0.22; p<0.00001). There were no statistical differences in the rate of postoperative complications in both groups (OR=1.07; CI=0.50;2.30; p=0.85). The risk of developing postoperative anal incontinence is 0.86 times lower in the BTA group than in the LSS group (OR=0.14; CI=0.03;0.64; p=0.01). The risk of relapse after lateral subcutaneous sphincterotomy is 6.06 times lower than when using botulinum toxin type A (OR=6.06; CI=3.52;10.42; p<0.00001).
CONCLUSION The use of botulinum toxin type A in the treatment of chronic anal fissure reduces the risk of developing postoperative anal incontinence, but this method is significantly inferior to lateral subcutaneous sphincterotomy in terms of the rate of chronic anal fissure epithelization.

About the Authors

R. Yu. Khryukin
Ryzhikh National Medical Research Centre for Coloproctology of the Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation
2, Salyama Adilya street, Moscow, 123423
tel.: +7 (499) 199-04-09


I. V. Kostarev
Ryzhikh National Medical Research Centre for Coloproctology of the Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation
Moscow


K. I. Arslanbekova
Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Moscow


M. A. Nagudov
Ryzhikh National Medical Research Centre for Coloproctology of the Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation
Moscow


E. E. Zharkov
Ryzhikh National Medical Research Centre for Coloproctology of the Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation
Moscow


References

1. Stewart DBSr, Gaertner W, Glasgow S. Clinical practice guideline for the management of anal fissures. Dis Colon Rectum. 2017;60(1):7-14.

2. Motie MR, Hashemi P. Chronic anal fissure: a comparative study of medical treatment versus surgical sphincterotomy. Acta Med Iran. 2016;54(7):437-440.

3. Adamova Z, Slovacek R, Bar T. Anal fissure. Cas Lek Cesk. 2015;154(1):11-13.

4. Malaty HM, Sansgiry S, Artinyan A. Time Trends, clinical characteristics, and risk factors of chronic anal fissure among a national cohort of patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Dig Dis Sci. 2016;61(3):861-864.

5. Shelygin Yu.A. Clinical recommendations. Coloproctology. Ed. Corresponding Member RAS Yu.A. Shelygin. M.: GEOTAR-Media, 2015, pp. 12-29. (in Russ.).

6. Shelygin Yu.A., Frolov S.A., Orlova L.P. Immediate results of a comprehensive treatment of chronic anal fissure. Koloproktologia. 2010; no. 1(31), pp. 4-9. (in Russ.).

7. Blagodarny L.A., Poletov N.N., Zharkov E.E. Pathogenesis of anal fissures. Koloproktologia. 2007; no. 1(19), pp. 38-41. (in Russ.).

8. Blagodarny L.A., Zharkov E.E. The results of conservative t ment of chronic anal fissure in combination with bleeding hemorrhoids. Koloproktologia. 2007; no. 1(19), pp. 34-38. (in Russ.).

9. Tkalich O.V., Zharkov E.E., Ponomarenko A.A. Modern methods of drug relaxation of the internal sphincter in patients with anal fissure. Khirurg. 2019; no. 8, pp. 26-42. (in Russ.).

10. Nekhrikova S.V., Titov A.Yu., Kashnikov V.N. Outpatient t ment of patients with diseases of the anal canal and perianal region. Dokazatel’naya gastroenterologiya. 2019; v. 8, no. 3. pp. 27-37. (in Russ.).

11. Kuypers HC. Is there really sphincter spasm in anal fissure? Dis. Colon. Rectum. 1983;8 (26):493-494.

12. Lund JN, Binch C, McGrath J. Topographical distribution of blood supply to the anal canal. Br J Surg. 1999;4 (86):496-498.

13. Lund JN, Scholefield JH. Internal sphincter spasm in anal fissure. Br J Surg. 1997;12 (84): 1723-1724.

14. Schouten WR, Briel JW, Auwerda JJ. Anal fissure: new concepts in pathogenesis and treatment. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 1996;218:78-81.

15. Schouten WR, Briel JW, Auwerda JJ. Ischaemic nature of anal fissure. Br J Surg. 1996;1 (83):63-65.

16. Schouten WR, Briel JW, Auwerda JJ. Relationship between anal pressure and anodermal blood flow. The vascular pathogenesis of anal fissures. Dis Colon Rectum. 1994;7 (37):664-669.

17. Notaras MJ. Lateral subcutaneous sphincterotomy for anal fissure – a new technique. Proc R Soc Med. 1969;62 (7):713.

18. Eisenhammer S. The evaluation of the internal anal sphincterotomy operation with special reference to anal fissure. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1959;109:583-590.

19. Nelson R. Non surgical therapy for anal fissure. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 (4): CD003431.

20. Davies I, Dafydd L, Davies L. Long term outcomes after lateral anal sphincterotomy for anal fissure: a retrospective cohort study. Surg Today. 2014;44 (6):1032-1039.

21. Lysy J, Israelit-Yatzkan Y, Sestiery-Ittah M. Topical nitrates potentiate the effect of botulinum toxin in the treatment of patients with refractory anal fissure. Gut. 2001;48:221-224.

22. Massoud BW, Mehrdad V, Baharak T. Botulinum toxin injection versus internal anal sphincterotomy for the treatment of chronic anal fissure. Ann Saudi Med. 2005;25:140-142.

23. Liberati A, Altman D, Tetzlaff J. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ (Clinical research ed.). 2009;(339),p. b2700.

24. Higgins JP, Altman DР, G ø tzsche PC. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. Br Med. J. 2011;343:889-893.

25. Bobkiewicz A, Francuzik W, Krokowicz L. Botulinum Toxin Injection for Treatment of Chronic Anal Fissure: Is There Any DoseDependent Efficiency? A Meta-Analysis. World J Surg. 2016;40 (12):3064-3072. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3693-9.

26. Garg P, Garg M, Menon GR. Long-term continence disturbance after lateral internal sphincterotomy for chronic anal fissure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis. 2013;15 (3):104-117. doi: 10.1111/codi.12108.

27. Nelson RL, Chattopadhyay A, Brooks W. Operative procedures for fissure in ano. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011: CD002199.

28. Ebinger SM, Hardt J, Warschkow R. Operative and medical treatment of chronic anal fissures-a review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Gastroenterol. 2017;52 (6):663-676. doi: 10.1007/s00535-017-1335-0.

29. Mentes BB, Irkorucu O, Akin M. Comparison of botulinum toxin injection and lateral internal sphincterotomy for the treatment of chronic anal fissure. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;46 (2):232-237.

30. Arroyo A, Perez F, Serrano P. Surgical versus chemical (botulinum toxin) sphincterotomy for chronic anal fissure: long-term results of a prospective randomized clinical and manometric study. Am J Surg. 2005;189 (4):429-434.

31. Iswariah H, Stephens J, Rieger N. Randomized prospective controlled trial of lateral internal sphincterotomy versus injection of botulinum toxin for the treatment of idiopathic fissure in ano. ANZ J Surg. 2005;75 (7):553-555.

32. Abd Elhady HM, Othman IH, Hablus MA. Long-term prospective randomised clinical and manometric comparison between surgical and chemical sphincterotomy for treatment of chronic anal fissure. S Afr J Surg. 2009;47 (4):112-114.

33. Nasr M, Ezzat H, Elsebae M. Botulinum toxin injection versus lateral internal sphincterotomy in the treatment of chronic anal fissure: a randomized controlled trial. World J Surg. 2010;34(11):2730-2734.

34. Valizadeh N, Jalaly NY, Hassanzadeh M. Botulinum toxin injection versus lateral internal sphincterotomy for the treatment of chronic anal fissure: randomized prospective controlled trial. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2012;397 (7):1093-1098.

35. Shao WJ, Li GC, Zhang ZK. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing botulinum toxin injection with lateral internal sphincterotomy for chronic anal fissure. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2009;24:995-1000.

36. Sajid MS, Hunte S, Hippolyte S. Comparison of surgical vs chemical sphincterotomy using botulinum toxin for the treatment of chronic anal fissure: a meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis. 2008;10:547-552.

37. Colak T, Ipek T, Kanik A. A randomized trial of botulinum toxin vs. lidocaine pomade for chronic anal fissure. Acta Gastroenterol Belg. 2002;65:187-190.

38. Brisinda G, Cadeddu F, Brandara F. Randomized clinical trial comparing botulinum toxin injections with 0.2% nitroglycerin ointment for chronic anal fissure. Br J Surg. 2007;94:162-167.

39. Brisinda G, Maria G, Bentivoglio AR. A comparison of injections of botulinum toxin and topical nitroglycerin ointment for the treatment of chronic anal fissure. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:65-69.

40. Richard CS, Gregoire R, Plewes EA. Internal sphincterotomy is superior to topical nitroglycerin in the treatment of chronic anal fissure: results of a randomized, controlled trial by the Canadian Colorectal Surgical Trials Group. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43:1048-1057.

41. Jonas M, Neal KR, Abercrombie JF. A randomized trial of oral vs. topical diltiazem for chronic anal fissures. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44:1074-1078.

42. Jones OM, Brading AF, Mortensen NJ. The mechanism of action of botulinum toxin on the internal anal sphincter. Colorect Dis. 2002;4(1):71-72.

43. Bhardwaj R, Drye E, Vaizey C. Novel delivery of botulinum toxin for the treatment of anal fissures. Colorect Dis. 2006;8:360-364.

44. Lindsey I, Cunningham C, Jones OM. Fissurectomy – botulinum toxin: a novel sphincter-sparing procedure for medically resistant chronic anal fissure. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47:1947-1952.

45. Samim M, Twigt B, Stoker L. Topical diltiazem cream versus botulinum toxin a for the treatment of chronic anal fissure: a double-blind randomized clinical trial. An Surg. 2012;255(1):18-22. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318225178a.

46. Lin JX, Krishna S, Su’a B. Optimal Dosing of Botulinum Toxin for Treatment of Chronic Anal Fissure: A Systematic Review and MetaAnalysis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2016;59 (9):886-894. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000612.


Review

For citations:


Khryukin R.Yu., Kostarev I.V., Arslanbekova K.I., Nagudov M.A., Zharkov E.E. BOTULINUM TOXIN TYPE A AND LATERAL SUBCUTANEOUS SPHINCTEROTOMY FOR CHRONIC ANAL FISSURE WITH THE SPHINCTER SPASM. WHAT TO CHOOSE? (systematic literature review and meta-analysis). Koloproktologia. 2020;19(2):113-128. https://doi.org/10.33878/2073-7556-2020-19-2-113-128

Views: 1462


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-7556 (Print)
ISSN 2686-7303 (Online)