Preview

Koloproktologia

Advanced search

ENDOSCOPIC PIECEMEAL RESECTION OF LARGE BENIGN COLORECTAL NEOPLASIA: RESULTS OF A RUSSIAN MULTICENTER STUDY

https://doi.org/10.33878/2073-7556-2020-19-1-73-79

Abstract

AIM: to assess the safety of endoscopic piecemeal mucosal resection (EPMR) of large epithelial colorectal lesions and to identify risk factors for tumor recurrence.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: results of EPMR were evaluated in retrospective study, which was carried out in five regional endoscopic centers. The criterion for inclusion in the study was benign colorectal lesion of 20 mm and larger.

RESULTS: we found that complications of EPMR occurred in 13% of cases. In 9.2% it was intraoperative bleeding, which was stopped endoscopically. Postoperative bleeding was detected in 1.2% of patients, perforation – in 2.4%. Tumor recurrence developed in 12%. We have revealed a direct correlation between tumor recurrence and intraoperative bleeding (p=0.013) and a size of lesion >4 cm (p=0.012); the inverse correlation between the tumor recurrence and the fullness of the lifting during the removal (p=0.008) and the male gender of the patient (p=0.043).

CONCLUSION: significant risk factors of tumor recurrence after endoscopic piecemeal resection of large benign colorectal neoplasia were identified before the procedure (gender and tumor size) and intraoperatively (completeness of lifting and the intraoperative bleeding).

About the Authors

D. V. Zavyalov
Yaroslavl Regional Oncology Hospital
Russian Federation
Yaroslavl


S. V. Kashin
Yaroslavl Regional Oncology Hospital
Russian Federation
Yaroslavl


E. R. Olevskaya
Chelyabinsk Regional Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation
Chelyabinsk


S. V. Molchanov
Chelyabinsk Regional Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation
Chelyabinsk


E. A. Fedorova
Chelyabinsk Regional Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation
Chelyabinsk


Yu. Yu. Kamaletdinova
Republican Oncology Clinical Hospital of Bashkortostan Republic
Russian Federation
Ufa


A. A. Safuanov
Republican Oncology Clinical Hospital of Bashkortostan Republic
Russian Federation
Ufa


A. G. Korotkevich
Novokuznetsk City Clinical Hospital 29
Russian Federation
Novokuznetsk


S. A. May
Novokuznetsk City Clinical Hospital 29
Russian Federation
Novokuznetsk


K. I. Mersaidova
Municipal autonomic health care institution «City Clinical Hospital No. 40»
Russian Federation
Yekaterinburg


O. V. Meylah
Municipal autonomic health care institution «City Clinical Hospital No. 40»
Russian Federation
Yekaterinburg


References

1. Borisova A.A., Popov M.S., Zavyalov D.V. The results of the treatment of benign colon epithelial tumors. In the book: Actual issues of medical science, Abstracts of the 73 rd Russian Scientific and Practical Conference of Students and Young Scientists with International Participation, dedicated to the 75 th anniversary of Yaroslavl State Medical University. 2019; р. 126. (in Russ.).

2. Shelygin Yu.A., Achkasov S.I., Veselov V.V., Filon A.F. et al. Current principles in the treatment of large rectal adenomas. Onkologiya. Zhurnal imeni P.A. Gertsena. 2013; no. 2, pp. 32-37.

3. Mtvralashvili D.A., Likutov A.A., Veselov V.V., Maynovskaya O.A., Kashnikov V.N., Khomyakov E.A., Chernyshov S.V. Does lesion site affects outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colon neoplasia? Koloproktologia. 2019;18(2(68)):33-48. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33878/2073-7556-2019-18-2-33-41.

4. Tanaka S, Kashida H, Saito Y. et al. JGES guidelines for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection/endoscopic mucosal resection. Digestive Endoscopy. 2015; 27: 417-434. DOI: 10.1111/den.12456.

5. Veselov V.V., Vlasov S.B., Kuznetsov A.N., Skridlevsky S.N. et al. Results of endoscopic treatment of early forms of colon cancer. Klinicheskaya Endoscopiya. 2005; no. 2, pp. 6-10 (In Russ.).

6. Veselov V.V., Kashin S.V., Zav`yalov D.V., Goncharov V.I., Strunina A.A. The removal of tubular adenoma of the sigmoid colon by means of endoscopic mucosal resection: a case report. Dokazatel'naya gastroenterologiya. 2014; v. 3, no. 3, pp. 71-72. (in Russ.).

7. Kandel P, Wallace M. Colorectal Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (EMR). Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology. 2017; 31. DOI:10.1016/j.bpg.2017.05.006.

8. Chernyshov S.V., Tarasov M.A., Nagudov M.A., Mtvralashvili D.A. et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of transanal endoscopic microsurgery versus endoscopic submucosal dissection for rectal adenomas and early rectal cancer. Koloproktologia. 2019; v. 18, no. 2 (68), pp. 7-20. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33878/20737556-2019-18-2-7-14.

9. Seo GJ, Sohn DK, Han KS. et al. Recurrence after endoscopic piecemeal mucosal resection for large sessile colorectal polyps. World J Gastroenterol. 2010; 16: 2806-2811.

10. Sakamoto T, Matsuda T, Otake Y. et al. Predictive factors of local recurrence after endoscopic piecemeal mucosal resection. J Gastroenterol. (2012) 47: 635. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535011-0524-5.

11. Belderbos TD, Leenders M, Moons LM. et al. Local recurrence after endoscopic mucosal resection of nonpedunculated colorectal lesions: systematic review and metaanalysis. Endoscopy. 2014 May; 46(5):388-402. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1364970. Epub 2014 Mar 26.

12. Mitrakov А.A., Kryazhov V., Smirnova R.S. et al. Endoscopic methods for treatment of colorectal neoplasia. Oncology bulletin of the Volga region. 2018; рр. 57-61. DOI: 10.32000/2078-1466-20183-57-61. (in Russ.).

13. Kim B, Choi AR, Park SJ. et al. Long-Term Outcome and Surveillance Colonoscopy after Successful Endoscopic Treatment of Large Sessile Colorectal Polyps. Yonsei Med J. 2016 Sep; 57(5):11061114. https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2016.57.5.1106.

14. Sidhu M, Tate DJ, Desomer L et al. The size, morphology, site, and access score predicts critical outcomes of endoscopic mucosal resection in the colon. Endoscopy. 2018 Jul;50(7):684-692. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-124081.


Review

For citations:


Zavyalov D.V., Kashin S.V., Olevskaya E.R., Molchanov S.V., Fedorova E.A., Kamaletdinova Yu.Yu., Safuanov A.A., Korotkevich A.G., May S.A., Mersaidova K.I., Meylah O.V. ENDOSCOPIC PIECEMEAL RESECTION OF LARGE BENIGN COLORECTAL NEOPLASIA: RESULTS OF A RUSSIAN MULTICENTER STUDY. Koloproktologia. 2020;19(1):73-79. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33878/2073-7556-2020-19-1-73-79

Views: 711


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-7556 (Print)
ISSN 2686-7303 (Online)