CLASSIFICATION OF HEMORROIDAL DISEASE, CRITERIA OF OBJECTIVITY
https://doi.org/10.33878/2073-7556-2019-18-1-46-56
Abstract
AIM: to assess objective criteria for the prolapsed of internal hemorrhoids piles and to define the degree ofexternal hemorrhoids enlargement in comparison with the Goligher classification. PATIENTS AND METHODS: the clinical and anatomical status of patients with various forms of hemorrhoids was evaluated within the multicenter observation program «REVISION». The study is based on the analysis of clinical and instrumental examination of 1020 patients with stages I-IV of hemorrhoids aged 44.1+12.7 (18-81) years. The study included 506 (49.6%) females. RESULTS: the data obtained show an irregular increase of internal and external piles, which can be expressed in digital form. In patients with stage I-II, the presence of external pileswas detected in 64.7% and 55.7% and in stage III-IV was revealed in 77.7% and 93.5%. Compliance with Goligher classification and the degree of piles enlargementin patients with stages I and II was notedin 225 (84.6%) and 236 (72.2%) cases (p<0.001). In patients with stages III and IV this compliance was detected only in 211 (66.1%) and 58 (53.7%) cases (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: the study showed that the Goligher classification is an inadequate tool for assessing the surgical status of hemorrhoids and evaluating surgical outcomes. The degree of prolapse can be classified according to the size of the internal hemorrhoid piles relative to the sector of the circumference of the anal canal and to the displacement of the pilein relationshipwith the "dentate line". The size of the external hemorrhoid piles is determined similarly in accordance with the perianal region.
About the Authors
E. A. Zagriadskii
MedicalCenter «ON-CLINIC»
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
A. M. Bogomazov
MedicalCenter «South»
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
E. B. Golovko
Clinic «MEDSIMSK 12»
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Воробьев, Г.И. Геморрой. / Г.И.Воробьев, Ю.А.Шелыгин, Л.А.Благодарный. // М.: Митра Пресс, 2002. - 192 с.
2. Захарченко, A.A. Клиническое значение артериального кровоснабжения прямой кишки при геморроидальной болезни./ А.А.Захарченко, А.Э.Штоппель, Е.В.Галкин //Актуальные вопросы колопроктологии: материалы второго съезда колопроктологов России с междунар. участием. - Уфа, 2007. - с. 153-155.
3. Загрядский, Е.А. Консервативная терапия геморроя. Альтернатива хирургическим методам или составлявшая часть? Результаты программы «CHORUS» / E.А.Загрядский, А.М.Богомазова, Е.Б.Головко // Колопроктология. - 2018. - №1 (63). - 27-35.
4. Титов, А.Ю. Вариант дифференцированной классификации геморроя/ А.Ю.Титов, Л.К.Багдасарян// Колопроктология (Приложение): Материалы III Всероссийского съезда колопроктологов. - 2011. -№3 (37). - с. 51-52.
5. Шелыгин, Ю.А. Модифицированная классификация геморроя / Ю.А.Шелыгин, А.Ю.Титов, М.В.Абрицова // Колопроктология. - 2015. -№2 (52). - с. 4-10.
6. Шелыгин, Ю.А. Клинические рекомендации. Колопроктология / под ред. Ю.А.Шелыгина. - // М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2015. - 528 с.
7. Aigner, F. The superior rectal artery and its branching pattern with regard to its clinical influence on ligation techniques for internal hemorrhoids./F. Aigner, G.Bodner, F, Conrad F et al. // Am. J. Surg. -2004. - 187 (1). - p. 102-8.
8. Aigner, F. The Vascular Nature of Hemorrhoids. / F.Aigner, G.Bodner, H.Gruber et al. // J. Gastrointest Surg. - 2006. - 10 (7). - p. 1044-1050.
9. Aigner, F. Observational study on grade-dependent treatment for hemorrhoidal disease: a single center experience./F.Aigner, A.Schwamberger, H.Fritsch et al. // Eur. Surg. - 2009. - 41 (1) - р. 40-47.
10. Armstrong, D.N. Harmonic Scalpel vs. electrocautery hemorrhoidectomy: a prospective evaluation. / D.N.Armstrong, W.L.Ambroze, M.E.Schertzer et al. // Dis. Colon Rectum. - 2001. - 44 (4) - р. 558-564.
11. Bursics, A. Comparison of early and 1-year follow-up results of conventional hemorrhoidectomy and hemorrhoid artery ligation: a randomized study. / A.Bursics, K.Morvay, P.Kupcsulik et al. // Int. J. Colorectal Dis. - 2004. - 19 (2). - р. 176-80.
12. Elbetti, C. The single pile classification: a new tool for the classification of haemorroidal disease and the comparison of treatment results. / C.Elbetti, I.Giani, E.Novelli et al. // Updates Surg. - 2015. - 67 (4) -р. 421-6.
13. Gaj, F. The new classification of hemorrhoids: PATE 2000-Sorrento. / F.Gaj, A.Trecca, A.Busotti et al. // Minerva Chir. - 2002. - 57 (3). - р. 331-339.
14. Gaj, F. The new classification of hemorrhoids: PATE 2000-Sorrento. History of the scientific debate. / F.Gaj, A.Trecca, A.Busotti et al. // Minerva Chir. - 2002. -57 (3). - р. 331-339.
15. Gaj, F. PATE 2000 Sorrento: a modern, effective instrument for defining haemorrhoids./ F.Gaj, A.Trecca. // Chir. Ital. - 2004. - 56 (4). - р. 509-515.
16. Gaj, F. New «PATE 2006» system for classifying hemorrhoidal disease: advantages resulting from revision of «PATE 2000 Sorrento». / Gaj F., Trecca A. // Chir Ital. - 2007. - 59 (4). - р. 521-6.
17. Gerjy, R. Outcome after Haemorrhoidopexy. / R.Gerjy. // Linköping University Medical Dissertation No. 1064; Sweden. - 2008. - p. 76.
18. Goligher, J.C. Surgery of the anus, rectum and colon. / J.C.Goligher // 1st Pub. London: «Charles C Thomas». - 1961. - p. 829
19. Hardy, A. The Surgical Management of Haemorrhoids - A Review. / A.Hardy, C.L.H.Chan, C.R.G.Cohen. // Dig. Surg. - 2005. - 22 (1-2). - p. 26-33.
20. Huang,WS. Randomizedcomparisonbetweenstapled hemorrhoidopexy and Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy for grade III hemorrhoids in Taiwan: a prospective study. / W.S.Huang, C.C.Chin, C.H.Yeh et al. // Int. J. Colorectal Dis. - 2007. - 22 (8). - p. 955-61.
21. Hyung kyu Yang. Hemorrhoids. 2014. / Hyung kyu Yang // - Springer Berlin Heidelberg GmbH & Co. KG. 2014. - p. 142.
22. Johanson, J.F. The prevalence of hemorrhoids and chronic constipation. An epidemiologic study. / J.F.Johanson, A.Sonnenberg. // Gastroenterology. -1990. - 98 (2). - p. 380-86.
23. Lunniss, P.J. Classification of internal haemorrhoids: a discussion paper. / P.J.Lunniss, C.V.Mann. // Colorectal Dis. - 2004. - 6 (4). - p. 226-32.
24. Michio Asano. Standard treatment of hemorrhoids is a treatment option for standard hemorrhoids using multifactorial evaluation method (PEC classification) / Michio Asano, Masuda Yasuhide, Kawakami Kazuhiko et al. // Japan Colorectal Association Journal Magazine. - 2005. - 58. - p. 491
25. Morgado, P.J. Histoclinical basis for a new classification of hemorrhoidal disease. / P.J.Morgado, J.A.Suarez, L.G.Gomez. // Dis Colon Rectum. - 1988. -31 (6). - p. 474-80.
26. Riss, S. The prevalence of hemorrhoids in adults. / S.Riss, F.A.Weiser, K.Schwameis et al. // Int. J. Colorectal Dis. - 2012. - 27 (2). - p. 215-220.
27. Rivadeneira, D.E. Standards Practice Task Force of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Practice parameters for the management of hemorrhoids (revised 2010). /D.E.Rivadeneira, S.R.Steele, C.Ternent et al. // Dis. Colon Rectum. - 2011. - 54 (9). - p. 1059-64.
28. Schuurman, J.P. Anatomical branches of the superior rectal artery in the distal rectum. / J.P.Schuurman, P.M.Go, R.L.Bleys. // Colorectal Dis. -2009. - 11 (9). - p. 967-71.
29. Thomson, W.H.F. The nature of haemorrhoids. / W.H.F.Thomson // Br.J. Surg. - 1975. - 62 (7) - p. 542552.
30. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. // JAMA-2013. - 310 (20). - p. 21912194.
31. Zagriadskii, E.A. Conservative Treatment of Hemorrhoids: Results of an Observational Multicenter Study./ E.A.ZagriadskiT, A.M.Bogomazov, E.B.Golovko.// Advances in Therapy. - 2018. - 35 (11). - p. 1979-93.
Review
For citations:
Zagriadskii E.A., Bogomazov A.M., Golovko E.B. CLASSIFICATION OF HEMORROIDAL DISEASE, CRITERIA OF OBJECTIVITY. Koloproktologia. 2019;18(1(67)):46-56. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33878/2073-7556-2019-18-1-46-56
Views:
2788
Email this article 
