Preview

Koloproktologia

Advanced search

SURGICAL TREATMENT OF PILONIDAL DESEASE (review)

https://doi.org/10.33878/2073-7556-2018-0-4-79-88

Abstract

The treatment of pilonidal disease (PD) is extremely important now. Its incidence is up to 5% of the adults. PDtakes the fourth place among such coloproctological diseases as hemorrhoids, abscess and fistula-in-ano and anal fissure. The first experience of PD was described two centuries ago. During this period, various theories on etiology and pathogenesis of the disease were suggested. The western papers support the idea that the acquired genesis is a cause of PD. This point of view is the opposite to the countries of the former USSR, where pilonidal disease is considered as congenital pathology. Numerous procedures have been proposed because of the different theories of the etiopathogenesis if you take the point of view that the PD is a congenital disease it should be mentioned that the main goal of these methodsiselimination of pilonidal cyst with closure of the wound or without. If to consider PD as an acquired disease, the surgical break of pathogenetic mechanism is a key. Thisapproach includes: Bascom I, Cleft Lift, EPSiT procedures. Every procedure for PD has certain indications and contraindications. The aim of the review is to compare the main methods and determine their strengths and weaknesses. Unfortunately, today there is no "gold standard" in the treatment of pilonidal disease.

About the Authors

D. A. Khubezov
Ryazan State Medical University; Ryazan State Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation


D. K. Puchkov
Ryazan State Medical University; Ryazan State Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation


P. V. Serebryansky
Ryazan State Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation


R. V. Lukanin
Ryazan State Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation


A. Y. Ogoreltsev
Ryazan State Medical University; Ryazan State Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation


A. R. Krotkov
Ryazan State Medical University
Russian Federation


I. S. Ignatov
Ryazan State Medical University; Ryazan State Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation


References

1. Алекперов, Э.Э. Сравнительная оценка методов хирургического лечения острого воспаления эпителиального копчикового хода / Э.Э.Алекперов и соавт. // Колопроктология. - 2015. - № S1. -с. 14b-15.

2. Аминев, А.М. Лекции по проктологии. / А.М.Аминев // Рипол Классик, 1969.

3. Башанкаев, Н.А. Использование глухого шва при радикальных операциях по поводу острого гнойного воспаления эпителиального копчикового хода / Н.А.Башанкаев и соавт. // Амбулаторная хирургия: стационарозамещающие технологии: российский ежеквартальный научно-практический тематический журнал. - 2003. - № 2. -с. 45-47.

4. Богданов, В.Л. Обоснование тактики хирургического лечения нагноившегося эпителиального копчикового хода на стадии абсцесса (клиническое, анатомическое и экспериментальное исследования): дис канд.мед.наук: 14.01.17 / В.Л.Богданов, Ставроп. гос. мед. акад., Ставрополь, 2011. - 131 с.

5. Воробей, А.В. Лечение эпителиального копчикового хода методом перемещенного ромбовидного кожного лоскута по Лимбергу / А.В.Воробей и соавт. // Рецепт. - 2006. - № 3. - с. 158-160.

6. Воробьев, Г.И. Основы колопроктологии / Г.И.Воробьев и соавт. // М.: Медицинское информационное агентство. - 2006. - с. 77-78.

7. Гобеджишвили, В.К. Варианты закрытия раны после иссечения эпителиального копчикового хода / В.К.Гобеджишвили, П.М.Лаврешин, А.В.Муравьев // Сб.Проблемы колопроктологии. - 2000. - т. 17. - с. 59-60.

8. Даценко, Б.М. Оптимизация путей лечения острого нагноения эпителиального копчикового хода / Б.М.Даценко, А.Б.Даценко, Г.М.Або // Колопроктология. - 2004. - № 3. - с. 6-11.

9. Денисенко, В.Л. Оптимизация лечения эпителиального копчикового хода, осложненного абсцессом / В.Л.Денисенко //Новости хирургии. - 2008. -т. 16. - № 1. - c. 55-61.

10. Дульцев, Ю.В. Эпителиальный копчиковый ход./ Ю.В.Дульцев, В.Л.Ривкин // Медицина, М., 1988. - 127 с.

11. Лурин, И.А. Этиология и патогенез пилонидальной болезни (обзор литературы) / И.А.Лурин, Е.В.Цема // Колопроктология. - 2013. - № 3 (45). с. 35-49.

12. Помазкин, В.И. Модифицированная кожная пластика по Лимбергу при лечении эпителиального копчикового хода (с комментарием) / В.И.Помазкин //Хирургия. Журнал им. Н.И.Пирогова. - 2015. -№ 5. - с. 51-55.

13. Попков, О.В. Эпителиальный копчиковый ход. Методы хирургического лечения. / О.В.Попков и соавт. // Военная медицина, Минск. - 2017. -№ 1 (42). - с. 101-106.

14. Стрельников, Б.Е. Эпителиальные кисты крестцово-копчиковой области. / Б.Е.Стрельников // М.: Медгиз, 1962. - 88 с.

15. Табидзе, Д.Л. Опыт радикального лечения пилонидальной кисты (эпителиального копчикового хода) методом Bascom II (cleftlift) / Д.Л.Табидзе, В.В.Саенко // Хірургія України. - 2016. - № 4. с. 63-66.

16. Aldaqal, S.M. A new technique in management of pilonidal sinus, a university teaching hospital experience / S.M.Aldaqal et al. // International surgery. - 2013. - № 98 (4). - p. 304-306.

17. Anderson, A.W. Hair extracted from an ulcer / A.W.Anderson // Boston Med. Surg. J. - 1847. -№ 36 - p. 74.

18. Arslan, K. et al. Which flap method should be preferred for the treatment of pilonidal sinus? A prospective randomized study / K.Arslan et al. // Techniques in coloproctology. - 2014. - № 18 (1). -p. 29-37.

19. Azab, A.S.G. et al. Radical cure of pilonidal sinus by a transposition rhomboid flap / A.S.G.Azab et al. // British journal of surgery. - 1984. - № 71 (2). - p. 154-155.

20. Bascom, J. Pilonidal disease: long-term results of follicle removal / J.Bascom // Diseases of the colon & rectum. - 1983. - № 26 (12). - p. 800-807.

21. Bascom, J. Pilonidal disease: origin from follicles of hairs and results of follicle removal as treatment / J.Bascom // Surgery. - 1980. - № 87 (5). - p. 567-572.

22. Bascom, J.U. Repeat pilonidal operations / J.U.Bascom // The American journal of surgery. -1987. - № 154 (1). - p. 118-122.

23. Bascom, J. Failed pilonidal surgery: new paradigm and new operation leading to cures / J.Bascom, T.Bascom // Archives of Surgery. - 2002. -№ 137 (10). - p. 1146-1150.

24. Can, M.F. Comparison of Karydakis flap reconstruction versus primary midline closure in sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease: results of 200 military service members / M.F.Can, M.M.Sevinc, M.Yilmaz // Surgery today. - 2009. - № 39 (7). -р. 580-586.

25. Chia, C.L.K. Endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment in the Asian population / C.L.K.Chia, V.W.Y.Tay, S.K.Mantoo // Surgical Laparoscopy Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques. - 2015. - № 25 (3). -p. 95-97.

26. Cubukcu, A. The role of obesity on the recurrence of pilonidal sinus disease in patients, who were treated by excision and Limberg flap transposition / A.Cubukcu et al. // International journal of colorectal disease. - 2000. - № 15 (3). - p. 173-175.

27. Dahmann, S. Comparison of treatments for an infected pilonidal sinus: Differences in scar quality and outcome between secondary wound healing and limberg flap in a prospective study / S.Dahmann, P.B.Lebo, M.V.Meyer-Marcotty // Handchirurgie, Mikrochirurgie, plastische Chirurgie: Organ der Deutschsprachigen Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Handchirurgie: Organ der Deutschsprachigen Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Mikrochirurgie der Peripheren Nerven und Gefasse: Organ der V. - 2016. - № 48 (2). -p. 111-119.

28. Givel, J.C. Anorectal and colonic diseases: a practical guide to their management. / J.C.Givel, N.J.Mortensen, B.Roche (ed.). // Springer Science & Business Media. - 2009.

29. Guner, A. Limberg flap versus Bascom cleft lift techniques for sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus: prospective, randomized trial / A.Guner et al. // World journal of surgery. - 2013. - № 37 (9). - p. 2074-2080.

30. Guner, A. Pilonidal sinus-challenges and solutions / A.Guner, A.B.Cekic // Open Access Surgery. -2015. - № 8 - p. 67-71.

31. Humphries, A.E. Evaluation and management of pilonidal disease / A.E.Humphries, J.E.Duncan // Surgical Clinics of North America. - 2010. - № 90 (1). -p. 113-124.

32. Karydakis, G.E. Easy and successful treatment of pilonidal sinus after explanation of its causative process / G.E.Karydakis // ANZ Journal of Surgery. -1992. - № 62 (5). - p. 385-389.

33. Karydakis, G.E. New approach to the problem of pilonidal sinus / G.E.Karydakis // The Lancet. -1973. - № 302 (7843). - p. 1414-1415.

34. Käser, S.A. Primary wound closure with a Limberg flap vs. secondary wound healing after excision of a pilonidal sinus: a multicentre randomised controlled study / S.A.Käser et al. // International journal of colorectal disease. - 2015. - № 30 (1). - p. 97-103.

35. Keshvari, A. Karydakis flap versus excision-only technique in pilonidal disease / A.Keshvari et al. // Journal Of Surgical Research. - 2015. - № 198 (1). p. 260-266.

36. Khan, P.S. Limberg flap versus primary closure in the treatment of primary sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease; a randomized clinical trial / P.S.Khan, H.Hayat, G.Hayat // Indian Journal of Surgery. -2013. - № 75 (3). - p. 192-194.

37. McCallum, I.J.D. Healing by primary closure versus open healing after surgery for pilonidal sinus: systematic review and meta-analysis / I.J.D.McCallum, P.M.King, J.Bruce // BMJ. - 2008. -№ 336 (7649). - p. 868-871.

38. Meinero P. et al. Endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment: a prospective multicentre trial / P.Meinero et al. // Colorectal Disease. - 2016. - № 18 (5).

39. Meinero, P. Endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment (EP Si. T.) / P.Meinero, L.Mori, G.Gasloli // Techniques in coloproctology. - 2014. - № 18 (4). - p. 389-392.

40. Milito, G. Rhomboid flap procedure for pilonidal sinus: results from 67 cases / G.Milito, F.Cortese, C.U.Casciani // International journal of colorectal disease. - 1998. - № 13 (3). - p. 113-115.

41. Milone, M. et al. The role of drainage after excision and primary closure of pilonidal sinus: a meta-analysis / M.Milone et al. // Techniques in coloproctology. - 2013. - № 17 (6). - p. 625-630.

42. Milone, M. et al. Video-assisted ablation of pilonidal sinus: a new minimally invasive treatment-a pilot study / M.Milone et al. // Surgery. - 2014. -№ 155 (3). - p. 562-566.

43. Mutaf, M. et al. A new technique for closure of large meningomyelocele defects / M.Mutaf et al. // Annals of plastic surgery. - 2007. - № 59 (5). - p. 538-543.

44. Mutaf, M. A New Surgical Technique for Closure of Pilonidal Sinus Defects: Triangular Closure Technique / M.Mutaf, M.Temel, M.N.Koç // Medical science monitor: international medical journal of experimental and clinical research. - 2017. - № 23. - p. 1033.

45. Muzi, M.G. et al. Randomized comparison of Limberg flap versus modified primary closure for the treatment of pilonidal disease / M.G.Muzi et al. // The American Journal of Surgery. - 2010. - № 200 (1). -p. 9-14.

46. Nordon, I.M. A prospective randomized controlled trial of simple Bascom’s technique versus Bascom’s cleft closure for the treatment of chronic pilonidal disease / I.M.Nordon, A.Senapati, N.P.J.Cripps // The American Journal of Surgery. - 2009. - № 197 (2). -p. 189-192.

47. Patey, D.H. The hair of the pilonidal sinus / D.H.Patey, R.W.Scarff // The Lancet. - 1955. -№ 265 (6867). - p. 772-773.

48. Perruchoud, Vuilleumier, Givel. Pilonidal sinus: how to choose between excision and open granulation versus excision and primary closure? Study of a series of 141 patients operated on from 1991 to 1995 / Perruchoud, Vuilleumier, Givel // Swiss surgery. -2002. - № 8 (6). - p. 255-258.

49. S0ndenaa, K. Influence of failure of primary wound healing on subsequent recurrence of pilonidal sinus. Combined prospective study and randomised controlled trial / K.S0ndenaa et al. // European Journal of Surgery. - 2002. - № 168 (11). - p. 614-618.

50. Tsema, Y.V. Результаты лечения пилонидальной кисты крестцово-копчиковой области, осложненной острым абсцессом по методике Bascom I. / Y.V.Tsema // Запорожский медицинский журнал. - 2013. - № 6.

51. Warren, J.M. Abscess, containing hair, on the nates / J.M.Warren // Amer. J. Med. Sci. - 1854. -№ 28 - p. 113.


Review

For citations:


Khubezov D.A., Puchkov D.K., Serebryansky P.V., Lukanin R.V., Ogoreltsev A.Y., Krotkov A.R., Ignatov I.S. SURGICAL TREATMENT OF PILONIDAL DESEASE (review). Koloproktologia. 2018;(4):79-88. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33878/2073-7556-2018-0-4-79-88

Views: 870


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-7556 (Print)
ISSN 2686-7303 (Online)