ЛИКВИДАЦИЯ ДВУСТВОЛЬНЫХ ИЛЕОСТОМ (обзор литературы)

двуствольная илеостома, превентивная илеостома, закрытие илеостомы, ликвидация илеостомы, внутрибрюшное закрытие илеостомы

1. Воробьев, Г.И. Выбор оптимального вида превентивной кишечной стомы / С.В.Чернышов, Г.И.Воробьев, С.И.Севостьянов // Российский Журнал Гастроэнтерологии, Гепатологии, Колопроктологии. - 2007. - т. 2. - с. 69-74.

2. Лихтер, М.С. Мультидисциплинарный подход к лечению больных колоректальным раком с вовлечением органов мочевыделительной системы / М.С.Лихтер, Ю.А.Шелыгин, С.И.Ачкасов // Хирургия. Журнал им. Н.И. Пирогова. - 2012. -т. 12. - с. 34-39.

3. Хомяков, Е.А. Неостигмин в лечении и профилактике послеоперационного пареза желудочнокишечного тракта (Метаанализ и систематический обзор литературы) / Е.Г.Рыбаков, Е.А.Хомяков, А.А.Пономаренко // Колопроктология. - 2016. -т. 3. - № 57. - с. 91-102.

4. Чернышов, С.В. Аппаратный и ручной шов при закрытии превентивных илеостом / С.В.Чернышов, В.Н.Кашников, Е.Г.Рыбаков и соавт. // Колопроктология. - 2008. - т. 2. - № 24. -с. 40-43.

5. Чернышов, С.В. Показания и выбор вида превентивной стомы при плановых хирургических вмешательствах по поводу рака прямой кишки / С.В.Чернышов, С.И.Севостьянов, В.Н.Кашников // Колопроктология. - 2005. - т. 2. - № 3 (13). -с. 33-38.

6. Alvandipour, M. Purse-String Versus Linear Conventional Skin Wound Closure of an Ileostomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial / M.Alvandipour, B.Gharedaghi, H.Khodabakhsh et al. // Ann. Coloproctol. - 2016. - v. 32. - № 4. - p. 144-149.

7. Baraza, W. Postoperative management after loop ileostomy closure: are we keeping patients in hospital too long? / W.Baraza, J.Wild, W.Barber et al. // Ann. R. Coll Surg. Engl. - 2010. - v. 92. - № 1. - p. 51-55.

8. Bracey, E. Ileostomy closure in an enhanced recovery setting / E.Bracey, H.Chave, A.Agombar et al. // Color. Dis. - 2015. - v. 17. - № 10. - p. 917-921.

9. Feinberg, S.M. Complications of loop ileostomy. / S.M.Feinberg, R.S.McLeod, Z.Cohen // Am. J. Surg. -1987. - v. 153. - № 1. - p. 102-107.

10. Ulrich, A.B. Diverting stoma after low anterior resection: more arguments in favor. / A.B.Ulrich, C.Seiler, N.Rahbari et al. // Dis. Colon Rectum. - 2009. - v. 52. - № 3. - p. 412-418.

11. Wong, K.S. Loop ileostomy closure after restorative proctocolectomy: outcome in 1,504 patients. / K.S.Wong, F.H.Remzi, E.Gorgun et al. // Dis. Colon Rectum. - 2005. - v. 48. - № 2. - p. 243-250.

12. Gong, J. Stapled vs hand suture closure of loop ileostomy: a meta-analysis / J.Gong, Z.Guo, Y.Li et al. // Color. Dis. - 2013. - v. 15. - № 10. - p. 561-568.

13. Horisberger, K. Loop ileostomy closure: comparison of cost effectiveness between suture and stapler / K.Horisberger, G.Beldi, D.Candinas // World J. Surg. - 2010. - v. 34. - № 12. - p. 2867-2871.

14. Sajid, M.S. Systematic review and meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials comparing purse-string vs conventional linear closure of the wound following ileostomy (stoma) closure / M.S.Sajid, M.I.Bhatti, W.F.Miles // Gastroenterol. Rep. - 2015. -v. 3. - № 2. - p. 156-161.

15. Lahat, G. Wound infection after ileostomy closure: a prospective randomized study comparing primary vs. delayed primary closure techniques / G.Lahat, H.Tulchinsky, G.Goldman et al. // Tech. Coloproctol. - 2005. - v. 9. - № 3. - p. 206-208.

16. Leung, T.T. Comparison of stapled versus handsewn loop ileostomy closure: a meta-analysis / T.T.Leung, A.R.MacLean, W.D.Buie et al. // J. Gastrointest. Surg. - 2008. - v. 12. - № 5. - p. 939944.

17. Loffler, T. HAnd Suture Versus STApling for Closure of Loop Ileostomy (HASTA Trial): results of a multicenter randomized trial (DRKS00000040) / T.Loffler, I.Rossion, T.Bruckner et al. // Ann. Surg. -2012. - v. 256. - № 5. - p. 826-828.

18. Luglio, G. Ileostomy reversal with handsewn techniques. Short-term outcomes in a teaching hospital / G.Luglio, F.Terracciano, M.C.Giglio et al. // Int. J. Color. Dis. - 2017. - v. 32. - № 1. - p. 113-118.

19. Mansfield, S.D. Complications of loop ileostomy closure: a retrospective cohort analysis of 123 patients / S.D.Mansfield, C.Jensen, A.S.Phair et al. // World J. Surg. - 2008. - v. 32. - № 9. - p. 2101-2106.

20. Markides, G.A. Reversal of loop ileostomy under an Enhanced Recovery Programme - Is the stapled anastomosis technique still better than the handsewn technique? / G.A.Markides, I.Wijetunga, M.McMahon et al. // Int. J. Surg. - 2015. - v. 23. - №A. - p. 41-45.

21. Markides, G.A. Meta-analysis of handsewn versus stapled reversal of loop ileostomy / G.A.Markides, I.U.Wijetunga, S.R.Brown et al. // ANZ J. Surg. - 2015. - v. 85. - № 4. - p. 217-224.

22. Peacock, O. Closure of loop ileostomy: potentially a daycase procedure? / O.Peacock, C.I.Law, P.W.Collins et al. // Tech. Coloproctol. - 2011. - v. 15. - № 4. -p. 431-437.

23. Poskus, E. Complications after Loop Ileostomy Closure: A Retrospective Analysis of 132 Patients / E.Poskus, E.Kildusis, E.Smolskas et al. // Viszeralmedizin. - 2014. - v. 30. - № 4. - p. 276-280.

24. Robertson, J. Cost analysis of early versus delayed loop ileostomy closure: a case-matched study / J.Robertson, H.Linkhorn, R.Vather et al. // Dig. Surg. - 2015. - v. 32. - № 3. - p. 166-172.

25. Saha, A.K. Morbidity and mortality after closure of loop ileostomy / A.K.Saha, C.R.Tapping, G.T.Foley et al. // Color. Dis. - 2009. - v. 11. - № 8. - p. 866-871.

26. Senagore, A.J. Pathogenesis and clinical and economic consequences of postoperative ileus / A.J. Senagore // Am. J. Heal. Syst Pharm. - 2007. - v. 64. -№ 20 Suppl 13. - p. 3-7.

27. Shelygin, Y.A. Stapled ileostomy closure results in reduction of postoperative morbidity / Y.A.Shelygin, S.V.Chernyshov, E.G.Rybakov // Tech. Coloproctol. - 2010. - v. 14. - № 1. - p. 19-23.

28. Khomyakov, E.A. Postoperative paresis of the gastrointestinal tract / E.A.Khomyakov, E.G.Rybakov // Khirurgiya. Zhurnal im. N.I.Pirogova. - 2017. -№ 3. - p. 76.

29. Akhmetzyanov, F.S. Colorecral Anastomosis Failure (Literature Review) / F.S.Akhmetzyanov, V.I.Egorov // Sib. J. Oncol. - 2016. - v. 15. - № 2. -p. 107-112.

30. Bain, I.M. Comparison of sutured and stapled closure of loop ileostomy after restorative proctocolectomy / I.M.Bain, R.Patel, R.B.Keighley // Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. - 1996. - v. 78. - № 6. -p. 555-556.

31. Baker, L.W. Postoperative intestinal motility. An experimental study on dogs. / L.W.Baker, D.R.Webster // Br. J. Surg. - 1968. - v. 55. - № 5. - p. 374-378.

32. Böhm, B. Postoperative intestinal motility following conventional and laparoscopic intestinal surgery. / B.Böhm, J.W.Milsom, V.W.Fazio // Arch. Surg. - 1995. - v. 130. - № 4. - p. 415-419.

33. Borowski, D.W. Volume-outcome analysis of colorectal cancer-related outcomes. / D.W.Borowski, D.M.Bradburn, S.J.Mills // British Journal of Surgery. - 2010. - v. 97. - № 9. - p. 1416-1430.

34. Boyle, N.H. Intraoperative assessment of colonic perfusion using scanning laser Doppler flowmetry during colonic resection. / N.H.Boyle, D.Manifold, M.H.Jordan et al. // J. Am. Coll. Surg. - 2000. -v. 191. - № 5. - p. 504-510.

35. Branagan, G. Prognosis After Anastomotic Leakage in Colorectal Surgery / G.Branagan, D.Finnis // Dis. Colon Rectum. - 2005. - v. 48. - № 5. - p. 10211026.

36. Eckmann, C. Anastomotic leakage following low anterior resection: Results of a standardized diagnostic and therapeutic approach / C.Eckmann, P.Kujath, H.K.Schiedeck et al. // Int. J. Colorectal Dis. - 2004. -v. 19. - № 2. - p. 128-133.

37. Gaetano, L. Loop Ileostomy Reversal After Colonand Rectal Surgery / P.L.Gaetano, D.Stefan, R.R.Cima et al. // Arch. Surg. - 2011. - v. 146. -№ 10. - p. 113-118.

38. Van de Pavoordt, V.W. The outcome of loop ileostomy closure in 293 cases / V.W.F.H.D.W.M. van de Pavoordt, D.G.Jagelman, I.C.Lavery et al. // Color. Dis. - 1987. - v. 2. - p. 214-217.

39. Harris, D. Complications and mortality following stoma formation / D.Harris, D.Egbeare, S.Jones et al. // Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. - 2005. - v. 87. - № 6. -p. 427-431.

40. Hirotoshi H. Stapled Versus Sutured Closure of Loop Ileostomy A Randomized Controlled Trial / H.Hirotoshi, S.Radley, G.Dion,et al. // Ann. Surg -2000. - v. 231. - № 2. - p. 202-204.

41. Kann, B. Early Stomal Complications / B.Kann // Clin. Colon Rectal Surg. - 2008. - v. 21. - № 1. -p. 023-030.

42. Kimura, M. Improving the side-to-side stapled anastomosis: comparison of staplers for robust crotch formation / M.Kimura, Y.Kuwabara, S.Taniwaki et al. // Surg. Obes. Relat. Dis. - 2018. - v. 14. - № 1. -p. 16-21.

43. Lee, F.M. Antimicrobial prophylaxis may not be the answer: Surgical site infections among patients receiving care per recommended guidelines. / F.M.Lee, S.Trevino, E.Kent-Street et al. // Am. J. Infect. Control. - 2013. - v. 41. - № 9. - p. 799-802.

44. Livingston, E.H. Postoperative ileus. / E.H.Livingston, E.P.Passaro // Dig. Dis. Sci. - 1990. -v. 35. - № 1. - p. 121-32.

45. Lutfiyya, W.A. colorectal «care bundle» to reduce surgical site infections in colorectal surgeries: a single-center experience. / W.Lutfiyya, D.Parsons, J.Breen // Perm. J. - 2012. - v. 16. - № 3. - p. 10-16.

46. Kock, N.G. Intra-abdominal «reservoir» in patients with permanent ileostomy: Preliminary observations on a procedure resulting in fecal «continence» in five ileostomy patients / N.G.Kock // Arch. Surg. - 1969. -v. 99. - № 2. - p 223-231.

47. Oshima, T. Preoperative oral antibiotics and intravenous antimicrobial prophylaxis reduce the incidence of surgical site infections in patients with ulcerative colitis undergoing IPAA. / T.Oshima, Y.Takesue, H.Ikeuchi et al. // Dis. Colon Rectum. - 2013. - v. 56. - № 10. - p. 1149-1155.

48. Pendlimari, R. Diagnoses influence surgical site infections (SSI) in colorectal surgery: a must consideration for SSI reporting programs? / R.Pendlimari, R.R.Cima, B.G.Wolff et al. // J. Am. Coll. Surg. - 2012. - v. 214. - № 4. - p. 574-581.

49. Platell, C. The incidence of anastomotic leaks in patients undergoing colorectal surgery / C.Platell, N.Barwood, G.Dorfmann et al. // Color. Dis. - 2007. -v. 9. - № 1. - p. 71-79.

50. Roberts, P.L. Pitfalls in Use of Stapler in Gastrointestinal Tract Surgery / P.L.Roberts, W.A.Williamson, L.B.Sanders // Surg. Clin. North Am. - 1991. - v. 71. - № 6. - p. 1247-1257.

51. Robertson, I. Prospective analysis of stoma-related complications / I.Robertson, E.Leung, D.Hughes et al. // Color. Dis. - 2005. - v. 7. - № 3. - p. 279-285.

52. Rovera, F. Infectious complications in colorectal surgery. / F.Rovera, G.Dionigi, L.Boni et al. // Surg. Oncol. - 2007. - v. 16 Suppl. 1. - p. 121-124.

53. Scott-Conner, C. Neovascularization of canine sutured and stapled small intestinal anastomoses. / C.Scott-Conner, D.L.Dawson, J.M.Bennett // Am. Surg. - 1993. - v. 59. - № 10. - p. 645-649.

54. Amin, S.N. Defunctioning loop ileostomy and stapled side-to-side closure has low morbidity / S.N.Amin, N.C.Armitage, J.H.Scholefield // R. Coll. Surg. Engl. - 2001. - v. 83. - p. 246-249.

55. Hull, T.L. Comparison of Handsewn with StapledLoop Ileostomy Closures / L.T.Hull, I.Kobe, V.W.Fazio. // Dis. Colon Rectum. - 1996. - v. 39. -№ 10.

56. Yin, T.C. Early closure of defunctioning stoma increases complications related to stoma closure after concurrent chemoradiotherapy and low anterior resection in patients with rectal cancer. / T.C.Yin, H.L.Tsai, P.F.Yang et al. // World J. Surg. Oncol. - 2017. - v. 15. - № 1. - p. 80.

57. Zhou, M.W. Advantages of Early Preventive Ileostomy Closure after Total Mesorectal Excision Surgery for Rectal Cancer: An Institutional Retrospective Study of 123 Consecutive Patients. / M.W.Zhou, Z.H.Wang, Z.Y.Chen et al. // Dig. Surg. - 2017. - v. 34. - № 4. - p. 305-311.

58. Kalashnikova, I. The development and use of algorithms for diagnosing and choosing treatment of ostomy complications: results of a prospective evaluation. / I.Kalashnikova, S.Achkasov, S.Fadeeva et al. // Ostomy. Wound. Manage. - 2011. - v. 57. -№ 1. - p. 20-27.