Preview

Koloproktologia

Advanced search

EFFECT OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS ON THE BIOFILM GROWTH OF CLINICAL ISOLATES

https://doi.org/10.33878/2073-7556-2018-0-2-78-84

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. To study the effect of active extracellular substances of lactobacilli and antimicrobial agents on the inhibition and destruction of the biofilms formed clinically relevant microorganism strains. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The study of the impact of different agents on the biofilmformation and growth was carried out on resistant clinical strains of microorganisms obtainedfrom patients with post-surgical infectious inflammatory complications. We used wound dressing solution, cutaneous antiseptic, filtrates of 19 clinical strains of lactobacilli and a strain of Lactobacillus plantarum from the probiotic «Lactobacterin dry» (Microgen Nizhny Novgorod, series 46 / 06-1209) as a reference strain-producer of bacteriocins for biofilm inhibition. Biofilms were incubated for 48 hours on glass carriers at 37°C and visualized with a light microscope at 960x magnifying. RESULTS. All substances possess a good inhibitory potential and have approximately same level of effect. The skin antiseptic and wound washing fluid have only an inhibiting effect on the biofilmformation process, while the having a bactericidal effect on plantonicform of the cells. The lactobacilli filtrate inhibited the biofilmformation and was also able to destroy preformed 24-hour bacterial films. CONCLUSION. The use of lactobacilli bacteriocins can reveal additional opportunities for combating the infection associated with biofilm forming microorganisms.

About the Authors

M. A. Sukhina
State Scientific Center of Coloproctology
Russian Federation


I. A. Kalashnikova
State Scientific Center of Coloproctology
Russian Federation


V. N. Kashnikov
State Scientific Center of Coloproctology
Russian Federation


A. V. Veselov
State Scientific Center of Coloproctology
Russian Federation


V. I. Mikhalevskaya
State Scientific Center of Coloproctology
Russian Federation


A. Yu. Piyadina
I.I. Mechnikov Research Institute of Vaccine and Serum
Russian Federation


References

1. Плакунов, В.К. Персистенция и адаптивный мутагенез в биопленках / Е.А.Стрелкова, М.В.Журина // Микробиология. - 2010. - т. 79. -№ 4. - с. 447-458.

2. Сухина, М.А. Антагонистическая активность лактобацилл толстой кишки / М.А.Сухина и соавт. // Журнал микробиологии, эпидемиологии и иммунобиологии. - 2012. - № 1. - с. 41-49.

3. Чеботарь, И.В. Матрикс микробных биопленок / А.Н.Маянский, Н.А.Маянский // Клиническая микробиология и антимикробная химиотерапия. - 2016. - т. 18. - № 1. - с. 9-19.

4. Allison, D.G. The biofilm matrix / D.G.Allison // Biofouling. - 2003. - v. 19. - № 2. - p. 139-150.

5. Bassler, B.L. Bacterially speaking / B.L.Bassler, R.Losick // Cell. - 2006. - v. 125. - № 2. - p. 237-246.

6. Boehm, A. et al. Second messenger signalling governs Escherichia coli biofilm induction upon ribosomal stress / A.Boehm et al. // Molecular microbiology. - 2009. - v. 72. - № 6. - p. 1500-1516.

7. Ciofu, O. Pseudomonas aeruginosa chromosomal beta-lactamase in patients with cystic fibrosis and chronic lung infection. Mechanism of antibiotic resistance and target of the humoral immune response / O.Ciofu // APMIS. Supplementum. - 2003. -№ 116. - p. 1-47.

8. Cos, P. Biofilms: an extra hurdle for effective antimicrobial therapy / P.Cos et al. // Current pharmaceutical design. - 2010. - v. 16. - № 20. -p. 2279-2295.

9. Flemming, H.C. The biofilm matrix / H.C.Flemming, J.Wingender // Nature Reviews Microbiology. -2010. - Т. 8. - № 9. - С. 623.

10. Hoffman, L.R. Aminoglycoside antibiotics induce bacterial biofilm formation / Hoffman L.R. et al. // Nature. - 2005. - v. 436. - № 7054. - p. 1171.

11. Mulla, S. Comparison of MIC with MBEC assay for in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility testing in biofilm forming clinical bacterial isolates / S.Mulla, A.Kumar, S.Rajdev //Advances in Microbiology. - 2016. - v. 6. -№ 02. - p. 73.

12. Qu, Y. et al. Antibiotic susceptibility of coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated from very low birth weight babies: comprehensive comparisons of bacteria at different stages of biofilm formation / Y.Qu et al. // Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials. -2010. - v. 9. - № 1. - p. 16.

13. Stewart, P.S. Physiological heterogeneity in biofilms / P.S.Stewart, M.J.Franklin // Nature Reviews Microbiology. - 2008. - v. 6. - № 3. - p. 199.

14. T.Tolker-Nielsen Development and dynamics of Pseudomonas sp. biofilms / T.Tolker-Nielsen et al. //Journal of bacteriology. - 2000. - v. 182. - № 22. -p. 6482-6489.

15. Weigel, L.M. et al. High-level vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates associated with a polymicrobial biofilm / L.M.Weigel et al. // Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy. - 2007. -v. 51. - № 1. - p. 231-238.


Review

For citations:


Sukhina M.A., Kalashnikova I.A., Kashnikov V.N., Veselov A.V., Mikhalevskaya V.I., Piyadina A.Yu. EFFECT OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS ON THE BIOFILM GROWTH OF CLINICAL ISOLATES. Koloproktologia. 2018;(2):78-84. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33878/2073-7556-2018-0-2-78-84

Views: 701


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-7556 (Print)
ISSN 2686-7303 (Online)