Preview

Koloproktologia

Advanced search

Lateral pelvic lymph node dissection for rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Results of a prospective study

https://doi.org/10.33878/2073-7556-2025-24-4-46-52

Abstract

AIM: to evaluate the early results of selective lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LPLD) in patients with middle and low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant CRT with suspected lateral lymph nodes (LLN) involvement based on MRI data.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: a prospective single-arm single-center study included 70 patients with a verified diagnosis of rectal cancer (mrT1–4N1–2сM0–1) who underwent total mesorectal excision (TME) with LTLD after neoadjuvant chemotherapy between January 2023 and May 2025. Intraoperatively, all patients underwent fluorescent navigation with indocyanine green and LLN ultrasound. The primary endpoint was the presence of metastases in the LLN based on histology. Secondary endpoints included: sensitivity and specificity of MRI in detecting LLN metastases, postoperative morbidity, local recurrence rate, operation time, blood loss, hospital stay, and the relationship between LLN size and the presence of metastases.

RESULTS: in 23/70 (33%) patients, metastatic involvement of the LLN was confirmed. The sensitivity and specificity of MRI were 91% (95% CI: 72.0%–98.9%) and 38% (95% CI: 24.5%–53.6%). A comparison of the median short axis in patients with metastatic LLN involvement (9.2 (7.8; 11.3) mm) and in patients without metastasis (5.4 (4.2; 6.5) mm) revealed a significant difference (p < 0.001). The operation time was 210 (170; 265) minutes, and total blood loss was 60 (30; 120) ml. Clavien–Dindo grade I-II complications detected in 16/70 (23%) patients. No cases required re-operation. The hospital stay was 12 (10; 16) days. Local recurrences revealed in 3/70 (4%) patients with follow-up of 14 (8; 20) months.

CONCLUSION: selective LPLD after neoadjuvant HLT is a potentially effective method for reducing the risk of local recurrence in patients with suspected LLN involvement in rectal cancer. However, randomised controlled trials with a long follow-up period are needed to definitively assess its contribution to improving late outcomes.

About the Authors

I. S. Tishkevich
Ryzhikh National Medical Research Center of Coloproctology
Russian Federation

Ilya S. Tishkevich

Salyama Adilya st., 2, Moscow, 123423



M. V. Alekseev
Ryzhikh National Medical Research Center of Coloproctology; Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education
Russian Federation

Mikhail V. Alekseev

Salyama Adilya st., 2, Moscow, 123423; Barrikadnaya st., 2/1, bld. 1, Moscow, 125993



E. A. Khomyakov
Ryzhikh National Medical Research Center of Coloproctology; Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education
Russian Federation

Evgeniy A. Khomyakov

Salyama Adilya st., 2, Moscow, 123423; Barrikadnaya st., 2/1, bld. 1, Moscow, 125993



E. N Zakharkina
N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
Russian Federation

Elizaveta N. Zakharkina

Ostrovityanova St. 1, build.6, Moscow, 117513



E. G. Rybakov
Ryzhikh National Medical Research Center of Coloproctology
Russian Federation

Evgeny G. Rybakov

Salyama Adilya st., 2, Moscow, 123423



References

1. Takahashi T, Ueno M, Azekura K, et al. Lateral node dissection and total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000 Oct; 43(10 Suppl):S59-68. doi: 10.1007/BF02237228. PMID: 11052480.

2. Sugihara K, Kobayashi H, Kato T, et al. Indication and benefit of pelvic sidewall dissection for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006 Nov; 49(11):1663–72. doi: 10.1007/s10350-006-0714-z

3. Akiyoshi T, Ueno M, Matsueda K, et al. Selective lateral pelvic lymph node dissection in patients with advanced low rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy based on pretreatment imaging. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21(1):189-196. doi:10.1245/s10434-013-3216-y

4. Matsuoka H, Masaki T, Sugiyama M, et al. Impact of lateral pelvic lymph node dissection on evacuatory and urinary functions following low anterior resection for advanced rectal carcinoma. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2005;39:517–522.

5. Akasu T, Sugihara K, Moriya Y, Male urinary and sexual functions after mesorectal excision alone or in combination with extended lateral pelvic lymph node dissection for rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009; 16:2779–2786

6. Wong KY, Tan AM. Short term outcomes of minimally invasive selective lateral pelvic lymph node dissection for low rectal cancer. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2020;12(4):178-189. doi:10.4240/wjgs.v12.i4.178

7. Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009 Aug;250(2):187–96. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2

8. Alekseev M.V., Rybakov E.G., Sevostiyanov S.I. Indocyanine green intraoperative fluorescence angiography as prophylaxis of colorectal anastomotic leakage (a systematic review). Koloproktologia. 2017;(4):82-87. (In Russ.). doi:10.33878/2073-7556-2017-0-4-82-87

9. Kim TH, Jeong SY, Choi DH, et al. Lateral lymph node metastasis is a major cause of locoregional recurrence in rectal cancer treated with pre-operative chemoradiotherapy and curative resection. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008; 15:729–37. doi: 10.1245/s10434-007-9696-x

10. Ishihara S, Kawai K, Tanaka T, et al. (2017) Oncological outcomes of lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy. Dis Colon Rectum. 60(5):469–476.

11. Toda Shigeo, et al. “Lateral Pelvic Recurrence in Rectal Cancer Is Not Local Recurrence but Lymphatic Metastasis.” Journal of the anus, rectum and colon vol. 25 Apr. 2025; 9(2): 225-236. doi:10.23922/jarc.2024-102

12. Furuhata T, Okita K, Nishidate T, et al. Clinical feasibility of laparoscopic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection following total mesorectal excision for advanced rectal cancer. Surg Today. 2015;45(3):310-314. doi:10.1007/s00595-014-0906-4

13. Akiyoshi T, Matsueda K, Hiratsuka M, et al. Indications for Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Before and After Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy in Patients with Advanced Low-Rectal Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22 Suppl 3:S614-S620. doi:10.1245/s10434-015-4565-5

14. Ochiai K, Kaneko M, Nozawa H, et al. Incidence of and risk factors for lymphocele formation after lateral pelvic lymph node dissection for rectal cancer: a retrospective study. Colorectal Dis. 2020;22(2):161-169. doi:10.1111/codi.14831

15. Kuroda K, Yamamoto Y, Yanagisawa M, et al. Risk factors and a prediction model for lower limb lymphedema following lymphadenectomy in gynecologic cancer: a hospital-based retrospective cohort study. BMC Womens Health. 2017;17(1):50. Published 2017 Jul 25. doi:10.1186/s12905-017-0403-1

16. Maurer CA. Urinary and sexual function after total mesorectal excision. Recent Results Cancer Res. 2005;165:196-204. doi:10.1007/3-540-27449-9_21

17. Cormier JN, Askew RL, Mungovan KS, et al. Lymphedema beyond breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cancer-related secondary lymphedema. Cancer. 2010;116(22):5138-5149. doi:10.1002/cncr.25458

18. Konishi T, Kuroyanagi H, Oya M, et al. Multimedia article. Lateral lymph node dissection with preoperative chemoradiation for locally advanced lower rectal cancer through a laparoscopic approach. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(7):2358-2359. doi:10.1007/s00464-010-1531-y

19. Tokuhara K, Hishikawa H, Yoshida T, et al. (2020). Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic lateral pelvic node dissection for advanced lower rectal cancer. Surgical Endoscopy. 35(4), 1572–1578. doi:10.1007/s00464-020-07534-3

20. Mathew Joseph, et al. Postoperative Morbidity and Factors Predicting the Development of Lymphoceles Following Lateral Pelvic Node Dissection for Rectal Cancer: A Cohort Study. Annals of surgical oncology. 2025; 32(1): 165-175. doi:10.1245/s10434-024-16320-7


Review

For citations:


Tishkevich I.S., Alekseev M.V., Khomyakov E.A., Zakharkina E.N., Rybakov E.G. Lateral pelvic lymph node dissection for rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Results of a prospective study. Koloproktologia. 2025;24(4):46-52. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33878/2073-7556-2025-24-4-46-52

Views: 9


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-7556 (Print)
ISSN 2686-7303 (Online)