Extra- and intracorporeal anastomosis in right hemicolectomy (observational cohort study)
https://doi.org/10.33878/2073-7556-2025-24-3-167-175
Abstract
AIM: to compare intracorporeal and extracorporeal anastomosis in right hemicolectomy in patients with CRC.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: observational cohort study included 296 patients with colorectal cancer who underwent elective right hemicolectomy with ileo-transversal anastomosis (2023-2024). Patients were divided into two groups: extracorporeal (ECA) and intracorporeal (ICA) The primary endpoint was the rate and severity of postoperative complications by Clavien-Dindo scale, while the secondary endpoints were the time of surgery and hospital stay, gastrointestinal tract recovery time, readmission and postoperative ventral hernia rate. All interventions were performed by surgeons, who are annually performing at least 30 procedures for CRC.
RESULTS: extracorporeal group included 226 (76.4%) patients, while 70 (23.6%) — intracorporeal one. The median time of surgery was found to be significantly shorter in the ECA group (185 [150; 223] min) compared to the intracorporeal anastomosis group (200 [185; 240] min) (p < 0.001). The incidence of postoperative morbidity according to the Clavien-Dindo classification did not differ between the groups. Intra-abdominal complications in the ICA group occured in 10% (n = 7/70) of patients, there were no cases of anastomotic leak in this group, while in the ECA group the incidence of intra-abdominal complications were 18.1% (n = 41/226) (p = 0.106), with anastomosis leak rate of 4.0% (n = 9/226). Infection of the surgical site was less in the ICA group — 5.7%, (n = 4/70), than in the ECA group — 15.9%, (n = 38/226) (p = 0.033). The recovery of bowel function was observed earlier in the ICA group: the first stool was observed on 3 [3; 4] days in the ECA group and 3 [2; 3] in the ICA group (p < 0.001); median of the first flatus were 2 [2; 2] and 2 [1; 2] days, respectively (p < 0.001). The length of stay for ICA was shorter than for ECA (5 [3; 6] days vs. 7 [6; 8], p < 0.001). A total of 158/296 (64.8%) patients were examined for incisional hernias. Incisional hernias were only diagnosed in the extracorporeal group, accounting for 54/128 (42.2%) cases. There were no hernias in the intracorporeal group — 0/30.
CONCLUSION: intracorporeal anastomosis in right hemicolectomy does not increase the risk of intra-abdominal complications and can be considered a safe alternative to extracorporeal anastomosis, which showed early bowel function recovery and reduction of the risk of wound infection and incisional abdominal hernia.
About the Authors
A. V. SazhinRussian Federation
Aleksandr V. Sazhin.
Ostrovitianov st., 1, Moscow, 117513; intra-territorial urban Municipal District of Kommunarka, village Kommunarka, Sosenskiy Stan st., 8, bld. 3, Moscow, 108814
I. V. Ermakov
Russian Federation
Igor V. Ermakov.
Ostrovitianov st., 1, Moscow, 117513; intra-territorial urban Municipal District of Kommunarka, village Kommunarka, Sosenskiy Stan st., 8, bld. 3, Moscow, 108814
G. B. Ivakhov
Russian Federation
Georgy B. Ivakhov.
Ostrovitianov st., 1, Moscow, 117513; intra-territorial urban Municipal District of Kommunarka, village Kommunarka, Sosenskiy Stan st., 8, bld. 3, Moscow, 108814
N. A. Timoshenko
Russian Federation
Nikita A. Timoshenko.
Ostrovitianov st., 1, Moscow, 117513
I. S. Shikhin
Russian Federation
Ivan S. Shikhin.
Ostrovitianov st., 1, Moscow, 117513; intra-territorial urban Municipal District of Kommunarka, village Kommunarka, Sosenskiy Stan st., 8, bld. 3, Moscow, 108814
I. A. Morozov
Russian Federation
Ilya A. Morozov.
Ostrovitianov st., 1, Moscow, 117513
References
1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA: A CANCER Journal for Clinicians. 2021;71(3):209–249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660
2. Fedyanin M.Y., Gladkov O.A., Gordeev S.S., et al. Cancer of the colon, rectosigmoid junction and rectum. Malignant Tumors. 2023;13(3s2-1):425–482. (In Russ.). doi: 10.18027/2224-5057-2023-13-3s2-1-425-482
3. Ansa BE, Coughlin SS, Alema-Mensah E, et al. Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer Incidence Trends in the United States (2000–2014). Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2018;7(2):22. doi: 10.3390/jcm7020022
4. Clinical recommendations. Malignant neoplasm of the colon. 2022-2023-2024 (12/12/2022) — Approved by the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation. (In Russ.).
5. Frasson M, Granero-Castro P, Ramos Rodríguez JL, et al. & ANACO Study Group. Risk factors for anastomotic leak and postoperative morbidity and mortality after elective right colectomy for cancer: results from a prospective, multicentric study of 1102 patients. International journal of colorectal disease. 2016;31(1):105–114. doi: 10.1007/s00384-015-2376-6
6. Dohrn N, Klein MF, Gögenur I. Robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy for colon cancer: a nationwide cohort study. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2021 Oct;36(10):2147–2158. doi: 10.1007/s00384-021-03966-y Epub 2021 Jun 2. PMID: 34076746
7. Koneru S, Reece MM, Goonawardhana D, et al. Right hemicolectomy anastomotic leak study: a review of right hemicolectomy in the binational clinical outcomes registry (BCOR). ANZ J Surg. 2023 Jun;93(6):1646–1651. doi: 10.1111/ans.18337 Epub 2023 Feb 24. PMID: 36825639.
8. Dulskas A, Kuliavas J, Sirvys A, et al. Anastomotic Leak Impact on Long-Term Survival after Right Colectomy for Cancer: A Propensity-Score-Matched Analysis. J Clin Med. 2022 Jul 28;11(15):4375. doi: 10.3390/jcm11154375 PMID: 35955993; PMCID: PMC9369268.
9. Xu L, Su X, He Z, et al. RELARC Study Group. Short-term out-comes of complete mesocolic excision versus D2 dissection in patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy for right colon cancer (RELARC): a randomised, controlled, phase 3, superiority trial. The Lancet. Oncology. 2021;22(3):391–401. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30685-9
10. Bollo J, Salas P, Martinez MC, et al. Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in right hemicolectomy assisted by laparoscopy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018;33:1635–1641. doi: 10.1007/s00384-018-3157-9
11. Ferrer-Márquez M, Rubio-Gil F, Torres-Fernández R, et al. Intracorporeal Versus Extracorporeal Anastomosis in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy: A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial (The IVEA-study). Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques. 2021 August;31(4):408–413. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000937
12. Pesce A, Petrarulo F, Fabbri N, et al. Incisional Hernia After Laparoscopic Right Colectomy for Colorectal Cancer: A Prospective Study with Retrospective Control on Intracorporeal Versus Extracorporeal Anastomosis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2024 Feb;34(2):113–119. doi: 10.1089/lap.2023.0453 Epub 2023 Nov 29. PMID: 38226949.
13. Sun R, Zhang Y, Feng B, et al. & RELARC Study Group. Intracorporeal Anastomosis Versus Extracorporeal Anastomosis in Laparoscopic Right Colectomy: An Observational Cohort Study. World journal of surgery. 2023;47(3):785–795. doi: 10.1007/s00268-022-06834-0
14. Ishizaki T, Mazaki J, Kasahara K, et al. Learning Curve of Intracorporeal Anastomosis in Laparoscopic Colectomy for Right Side Colon Cancer: A Cumulative Sum Analysis. Anticancer Res. 2023 Jul;43(7):3341–3348. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.16510 PMID: 37352005.
15. Mari GM, Crippa J, Costanzi ATM, et al. Intracorporeal Anastomosis Reduces Surgical Stress Response in Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy: A Prospective Randomized Trial. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2018 Apr;28(2):77–81. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000506 PMID: 29360701.
16. Milone M, Desiderio A, Velotti N, et al. Surgical stress and metabolic response after totally laparoscopic right colectomy. Sci Rep. 2021 May 6;11(1):9652. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-89183-7 PMID: 33958669; PMCID: PMC8102592.
17. Zhang T, Sun Y, Mao W. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in minimally invasive right hemicolectomy: upgrading the level of evidence. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023 May 30;38(1):147. doi: 10.1007/s00384-023-04445-2 PMID: 37248431.
18. Romanova E.M., Sushkov O.I., Surovegin E.S., et al. Laparoscopic right colectomy with intracorporeal ileotransverse anastomosis (results of the pilot study). Koloproktologia. 2021;20(4):50–55. (In Russ.). doi: 10.33878/2073-7556-2021-20-4-50-55
19. Perivoliotis K, Tzovaras G, Tepetes K, et al. Comparison of intracorporeal and extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right colectomy: an updated meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. Updates Surg. 2024 Apr;76(2):375–396. doi: 10.1007/s13304-023-01737-8 Epub 2024 Jan 12. PMID: 38216794.
20. Lee L, Abou-Khalil M, Liberman S, et al. Incidence of incisional hernia in the specimen extraction site for laparoscopic colorectal surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2017 Dec;31(12):5083–5093. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5573-2 Epub 2017 Apr 25. PMID: 28444496.
21. Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Hubner M, et al. Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Elective Colorectal Surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society Recommendations: 2018. World J Surg. 2019;43:659–695. doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-4844-y
22. Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009 Aug;250(2):187–96. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2 PMID: 19638912.
23. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205–13. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae PMID: 15273542; PMCID: PMC1360123.
24. Sanders DL, Pawlak MM, Simons MP, et al. Midline incisional hernia guidelines: the European Hernia Society. British Journal of Surgery. 2023 December; 110(Issue 12): 1732–1768. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad284
25. Stulberg JJ, Huang R, Kreutzer L, et al. Association Between Surgeon Technical Skills and Patient Outcomes. JAMA Surg. 2020 Oct 1;155(10):960–968. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.3007 Erratum in: JAMA Surg. 2020 Oct 1;155(10):1002. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.4676 Erratum in: JAMA Surg. 2021 Jul 1;156(7):694. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.1953 PMID: 32838425; PMCID: PMC7439214.
26. Yang SS, Kye BH, Kang SH, et al. Intracorporeal anastomosis in minimally invasive right hemicolectomy: a nationwide survey of the Korean Society of Coloproctology. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2024 Aug;107(2):59–67. doi: 10.4174/astr.2024.107.2.59 Epub 2024 Jul 30. PMID: 39139832; PMCID: PMC11317360.
27. Seno E, Allaix ME, Ammirati CA, et al. Intracorporeal or extracorporeal ileocolic anastomosis after laparoscopic right colectomy: cost analysis of the Torino trial. Surg Endosc. 2023 Jan;37(1):479–485. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09546-7 Epub 2022 Aug 23. PMID: 35999317.
28. Cuk P, Simonsen RM, Sherzai S, et al. Surgical efficacy and learning curves of laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision with intracorporeal anastomosis for right-sided colon cancer: A retrospective two-center cohort study. J Surg Oncol. 2023 Jun;127(7):1152–1159. doi: 10.1002/jso.27230 Epub 2023 Mar 18. PMID: 36933189.
29. Ishizaki T, Mazaki J, Kasahara K, et al. Learning Curve of Intracorporeal Anastomosis in Laparoscopic Colectomy for Right Side Colon Cancer: A Cumulative Sum Analysis. Anticancer Res. 2023 Jul;43(7):3341–3348. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.16510 PMID: 37352005.
30. Vignali A, Bissolati M, De Nardi P, et al. Extracorporeal vs. Intracorporeal Ileocolic Stapled Anastomoses in Laparoscopic Right Colectomy: An Interim Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2016 May;26(5):343–8. doi: 10.1089/lap.2015.0547 Epub 2016 Feb 26. PMID: 26919037.
31. Allaix ME, Degiuli M, Bonino MA, et al. Intracorporeal or Extracorporeal Ileocolic Anastomosis After Laparoscopic Right Colectomy: A Double-blinded Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Surg. 2019 Nov;270(5):762–767. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003519 PMID: 31592811.
32. Małczak P, Wysocki M, Pisarska-Adamczyk M, et al. Bowel function after laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a randomized controlled trial comparing intracorporeal anastomosis and extracorporeal anastomosis. Surg Endosc. 2022;36:4977–4982. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08854-8
33. Morpurgo E, et al. Robotic-assisted intracorporeal anastomosis versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for cancer: a case control study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2013 May;23(5):414–7. doi: 10.1089/lap.2012.0404
34. Ricci C, Casadei R, Alagna V, et al. A critical and comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing intracorporeal and extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2017 May;402(3):417–427. doi: 10.1007/s00423-016-1509-x Epub 2016 Sep 5. PMID: 27595589.
35. Emile SH, Elfeki H, Shalaby M, et al. Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in minimally invasive right colectomy: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Tech Coloproctol. 2019;23:1023–1035. doi: 10.1007/s10151-019-02079-7
36. Hajibandeh S, Hajibandeh S, Mankoti, R, et al. Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: upgrading the level of evidence. Updates Surg. 2021;73:23–33. doi: 10.1007/s13304-020-00948-7
37. Gundogan E, Kayaalp C, Gokler C, et al. Natural orifice specimen extraction versus transabdominal extraction in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. Cir Cir. 2021;89(3):326–333. English. doi: 10.24875/CIRU.20000321 PMID: 34037617.
Review
For citations:
Sazhin A.V., Ermakov I.V., Ivakhov G.B., Timoshenko N.A., Shikhin I.S., Morozov I.A. Extra- and intracorporeal anastomosis in right hemicolectomy (observational cohort study). Koloproktologia. 2025;24(3):167-175. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33878/2073-7556-2025-24-3-167-175