Preview

Koloproktologia

Advanced search

The effect of the timing of the elimination of preventive ileostomy on the incidence of severe low anterior resection syndrome

https://doi.org/10.33878/2073-7556-2025-24-3-106-114

Abstract

AIM: to study the effect of early ileostomy closure on the incidence of low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) in patients with rectal cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: one-hundred patients with rectal cancer underwent radiation therapy with a total focal dose of 50-54 Gy with radiomodification with capecitabine and low anterior rectal resection with preventive ileostomy. The primary endpoint of the study was the incidence of significant anorectal dysfunction at 3 months after ileostomy closure. Secondary endpoints included the incidence and severity of clinical manifestations of anorectal dysfunction, anal incontinence score according to the Wexner scale, overall distribution of anorectal dysfunction (absent, mild, severe) and the incidence of postoperative complications. Patients were randomized into two groups: with early ileostomy closure within 6 (5; 7) weeks after low anterior rectal resection (50 patients) and with late ileostomy closure after 24.5 (20; 29) weeks (50 patients). Three months after ileostomy closure, a questionnaire was done using the LARS and Wexner scales.

RESULTS OF THE STUDY: the results obtained at 3 months after ileostomy closure showed advantages of the early ileostomy closure group. According to the GIFO scale, clinical manifestations of anorectal dysfunction were significantly less common in this group (p < 0.05). According to the LARS scale, the incidence of anorectal dysfunction in the early ileostomy closure group was 40%, while in the late closure group it was 70% (OR (odds ratio) = 3.50; 95% CI (confidence interval): 1.49–8.23; p = 0.0046). Moreover, severe LARS was detected in 6% and 26% of patients, respectively (OR = 0.12; 95% CI: 0.03–0.43; p = 0.012). The Wexner scale score was also significantly better in the early closure group (5 (4; 8) points) compared to the late closure group (9 (8; 10) points, p < 0.0001). With regard to the complications that developed in the late ileostomy closure group, a significantly higher incidence of colitis was noted (21/50 (42%) versus 6/50 (12%) cases, p = 0.0014).

CONCLUSION: in the course of the conducted work it was established that 3 months after ileostomy closure, patients in the early closure group showed less manifestations of anorectal dysfunction compared to patients in the late closure group.

About the Authors

O. I. Kit
National Medical Research Center of Oncology
Russian Federation

Oleg I. Kit.

14th Line st., 63, Rostov-on-Don, 344037



O. K. Bondarenko
National Medical Research Center of Oncology
Russian Federation

Olga K. Bondarenko.

14th Line st., 63, Rostov-on-Don, 344037

tel.: +7 (988) 562-89-93



Yu. A. Gevorkyan
National Medical Research Center of Oncology
Russian Federation

Yuri A. Gevorkyan.

14th Line st., 63, Rostov-on-Don, 344037



N. V. Soldatkina
National Medical Research Center of Oncology
Russian Federation

Natalia V. Soldatkina.

14th Line st., 63, Rostov-on-Don, 344037



M. A. Gusareva
National Medical Research Center of Oncology
Russian Federation

Marina A. Gusareva.

14th Line st., 63, Rostov-on-Don, 344037



N. G. Kosheleva
National Medical Research Center of Oncology
Russian Federation

Natalia G. Kosheleva.

14th Line st., 63, Rostov-on-Don, 344037



D. S. Petrov
National Medical Research Center of Oncology
Russian Federation

Dmitry S. Petrov.

14th Line st., 63, Rostov-on-Don, 344037



D. A. Savchenko
National Medical Research Center of Oncology
Russian Federation

Dmitry A. Savchenko.

14th Line st., 63, Rostov-on-Don, 344037



References

1. Pape E, Pattyn P, Van Hecke A, et al. Impact of low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) on the quality of life and treatment options of LARS — A cross sectional study. Eur J Oncol Nurses. 2021;50:101878. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2020.101878

2. Nafedzov I.O. Low anterior resection syndrome in patients after total mesorectomectomy. Abstract of the dissertation for the degree of Candidate of Medical Sciences. 2021. Available by: https://new.gnck.ru/specialists/dissertatsii-gntsk/dissertation/nafedzov_auto.pdf (date of request: 31.01.2025). (In Russ.).

3. Bryant CL, Lunniss PJ, Knowles CH, et al. Anterior resection syndrome. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13(9):e403–e408. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70236-X

4. Kit O.I., Gevorkyan Y.A., Soldatkina N.V., et al. High-resolution anorectal manometry in the study of anorectal function after combined treatment of rectal cancer. Oncology Issues. 2020;66(4):385–390. (In Russ.). doi: 10.37469/0507-3758-2020-66-4-385-390

5. Gevorkyan Yu.A., Soldatkina N.V., Chernyak M.N., et al. A new method of modified chemoradiotherapy for cancer of the upper and middle ampullary rectum. South Russian Journal of Cancer. 2023;4(2):56–63. (In Russ.). doi: 10.37748/2686-9039-2023-4-2-6 EDN: ETDDQL.

6. Trenti L, Galvez A, Biondo S, et al. Quality of life and anterior resection syndrome after surgery for mid to low rectal cancer: A cross-sectional study. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018;44(7):1031–1039. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.03.025

7. Miacci FLC, Guetter CR, Moreira PH, et al. Predictive factors of low anterior resection syndrome following anterior resection of the rectum. Síndrome da ressecçãoanterior do reto: fatorespreditivos. Rev Col Bras Cir. 2020;46(6):e20192361. Published 2020 Jan 31. doi: 10.1590/0100-6991e-20192361

8. Christensen P, ImBaeten C, Espín-Basany E, et al. Management guidelines for low anterior resection syndrome — the MANUEL project. Colorectal Dis. 2021;23(2):461–475. doi: 10.1111/codi.15517

9. Turpin W, Kelly O, Borowski K, et al. Mucosa-Associated Microbiota in Ileoanal Pouches May Contribute to Clinical Symptoms, Particularly Stool Frequency, Independent of Endoscopic Disease Activity. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2019;10(5):1–7. doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000038

10. Sun W, Dou R, Chen J, et al. Impact of Long-Course Neoadjuvant Radiation on Postoperative Low Anterior Resection Syndrome and Quality of Life in Rectal Cancer: Post Hoc Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019;26(3):746–755. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-07096-8

11. Hughes DL, Cornish J, Morris C. LARRIS Trial Management Group. Functional outcome following rectal surgery-predisposing factors for low anterior resection syndrome. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017;32(5):691–697. doi: 10.1007/s00384-017-2765-0

12. Vaughan-Shaw PG, Gash K, Adams K, et al. Protocol for a multicentre, dual prospective and retrospective cohort study investigating timing of ileostomy closure after anterior resection for rectal cancer: The CLOSurE of Ileostomy Timing (CLOSE-IT) study. BMJ Open. 2018 Oct 15;8(10):e023305. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023305 PMID: 30327406; PMCID: PMC6196810.

13. Bausys A, Kuliavas J, Dulskas A, et al. Early versus standard closure of temporary ileostomy in patients with rectal cancer: A randomized controlled trial. J Surg Oncol. 2019 Aug;120(2):294–299. doi: 10.1002/jso.25488 Epub 2019 May 1. PMID: 31042015.

14. Danielsen AK, Park J, Jansen JE, et al. Early Closure of a Temporary Ileostomy in Patients With Rectal Cancer: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Surg. 2017 Feb;265(2):284–290. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001829 PMID: 27322187.

15. Fukudome I, Maeda H, Okamoto K, et al. The safety of early versus late ileostomy reversal after low anterior rectal resection: a retrospective study in 47 patients. Patient Saf Surg. 2021 Jan 10;15(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s13037-020-00275-1 PMID: 33423686; PMCID: PMC7798274.


Supplementary files

Review

For citations:


Kit O.I., Bondarenko O.K., Gevorkyan Yu.A., Soldatkina N.V., Gusareva M.A., Kosheleva N.G., Petrov D.S., Savchenko D.A. The effect of the timing of the elimination of preventive ileostomy on the incidence of severe low anterior resection syndrome. Koloproktologia. 2025;24(3):106-114. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33878/2073-7556-2025-24-3-106-114

Views: 14


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-7556 (Print)
ISSN 2686-7303 (Online)