Preview

Koloproktologia

Advanced search

Experience with upadacitinib using in treatment of ulcerative colitis in real clinical practice (pooled data)

https://doi.org/10.33878/2073-7556-2025-24-2-86-93

Abstract

AIM: to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Upadacitinib (UPA) — an oral selective janus-kinase 1 (JAK1) inhibitor in real clinical practice for the treatment of ulcerative colitis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: in 2021-2023, as part of a multicenter, prospective, open, uncontrolled study, fortysix patients with mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis (UC) were included (male: female ratio = 16:30, mean age 34 ± 3.1 years). Extraintestimal manifestation (EIM) initially was diagnosed in 7 patients (jonts and skin). Indications for UPA administration were: resistance to corticosteroids, ineffectiveness of basic and previously biologics treatment. The effectiveness was evaluated using the Mayo score, the Schroeder endoscopic index, as well as dynamic of hemoglobin, CRP and ESR. UPA was prescribed in accordance with the instructions for use: 45 mg for induction and 15/30 mg for maintenance therapy. The evaluation criteria were: the frequency of early primary clinical response within 1 week, the rate of clinical response/remission and endoscopic response/remission, the changes of EIM and the rate of adverse events (AE) in 8 weeks of induction and in 48 weeks of maintenance treatment.

RESULTS: all patients completed the induction course of UPA for 8 weeks. Early clinical response within 1 week with reduction of stool movements to 3 or less per day, absence of blood in stool was achieved in 25 (54.3%) patients. Clinical remission developed in 34 (73.9%) and clinical response in 3 (6.5%) of patients at the end of induction. Normal CRP and ESR levels and endoscopic remission was detected in 24 (52.2%) of patients in 8 weeks. The severity of EIM at the end of induction decreased in 4/7 (57.1%). One case of herpes zoster was registered as serious AE with drug withdrawal within the induction. The results of UPA maintenance therapy at week 48 were assessed in 16 patients. Clinical remission was maintained in 14/16 (87.5%) patients, with 11/16 (68.7%) of them receiving UPA at a maintenance dose of 30 mg per day, and 3/16 (31.3%) patients receiving 15 mg per day. In 2/16 cases (12.5%), clinical activity was maintained. Endoscopic remission developed in 10/16 (62.5%) patients, which was expressed in a decrease in the endoscopic Schroeder index decreases to ≤ 1 points, with 8 patients receiving a maintenance dose of 30 mg per day, and 2 patients receiving 15 mg per day. In the remaining patients, 4/16 (25%) (3 — UPA 30 mg, 1 — UPA 15 mg) cases had mild inflammation, and 2/16 (12.5%) (UPA 15 mg) had moderate activity.

CONCLUSIONS: in real practice, UPA allows to achieve an early clinical response, clinical and endoscopic remission after induction with good tolerability and safety in UC patients who refractory to corticosteroids and biologics.

About the Authors

O. V. Knyazev
Moscow Clinical Scientific Center named after Loginov
Russian Federation

Moscow Clinical Scientific Center named after Loginov

sh. Entuziastov, 86, Moscow, 111123



E. A. Belousova
Moscow Regional Research and Clinical Institute
Russian Federation

Elena A. Belousova

Prospect Mira, 61/2, Moscow, 129090



B. A. Vykova
Ryzhikh National Medical Research Center of Coloproctology
Russian Federation

Bella A. Vykova

Salyama Adilya st., 2, Moscow, 123423



A. V. Kagramanova
Moscow Clinical Scientific Center named after Loginov
Russian Federation

Anna V. Kagramanova

sh. Entuziastov, 86, Moscow, 111123



E. Yu. Lomakina
Moscow Regional Research and Clinical Institute
Russian Federation

Ekaterina Yu. Lomakina

Prospect Mira, 61/2, Moscow, 129090



Yu. V. Bakhtina
Ryzhikh National Medical Research Center of Coloproctology
Russian Federation

Yulia V. Bakhtina

Salyama Adilya st., 2, Moscow, 123423



K. A. Sergeeva
Ryzhikh National Medical Research Center of Coloproctology
Russian Federation

Kristina A. Sergeeva

Salyama Adilya st., 2, Moscow, 123423



I. A. Tishaeva
Central polyclinic on Leningradka
Russian Federation

Irina A. Tishaeva

1-st airport street 5, Moscow, 125319



References

1. Ungaro R, Mehandru S, Peyrin-Biroulet L. et al. Ulcerative colitis. Lancet. 2017;389:1756–1770.

2. Shelygin Y.A., Ivashkin V.T., Belousova E.A. Ulcerative colitis (K51), adults. Koloproktologia. 2023;22(1):10–44. (In Russ.). doi: 10.33878/2073-7556-2023-22-1-10-44

3. Rubin D, Ananthakrishnan N, Siegel C. ACG clinical guideline: ulcerative colitis in adults. Am J Gastroenterol. 2019;114:384–413

4. Harbord M, Eliakim R, Bettenworth D. Third European evidencebased consensus on diagnosis and management of ulcerative colitis. Part 2: current management. J Crohns Colitis. 2017;11:769–784.

5. Sands B, Sandborn W, Panaccione R, et al. Ustekinumab as induction and maintenance therapy for ulcerative colitis. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:1201–1214.

6. Feagan G, Rutgeerts P, Sands B, et al. Vedolizumab as induction and maintenance therapy for ulcerative colitis. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:699–710.

7. Sandborn W, Feagan G, Marano C. et al. Subcutaneous golimumab induces clinical response and remission in patients with moderateto-severe ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology. 2014;146:85–95.

8. Sandborn W, Assche G, Reinisch W. Adalimumab induces and maintains clinical remission in patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology. 2012;142:257–65.e1–3.

9. Boland S, Sandborn W, Chang T. Update on Janus kinase antagonists in inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2014;43:603–617.

10. Parmentier M, Voss J, Graff C. In vitro and in vivo characterization of the JAK1 selectivity of upadacitinib (ABT-494). BMC Rheumatol. 2018;2:23.

11. Irani M, Fan C, Glassner K, et al. Clinical Evaluation of Upadacitinib in the Treatment of Adults with Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis (UC): Patient Selection and Reported Outcomes. Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2023 Mar 7;16:21–28. doi: 10.2147/CEG.S367086

12. Loftus E, Colombel J, Takeuchi T, et al. Upadacitinib Therapy Reduces Ulcerative Colitis Symptoms as Early as Day 1 of Induction Treatment. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Aug;21(9):2347–2358.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.11.029

13. Ghosh S, Sanchez Gonzalez Y, Zhou W, et al. Upadacitinib treatment improves symptoms of bowel urgency and abdominal pain, and correlates with quality of life improvements in patients with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis. J Crohns Colitis. 2021;15:2022–2030.

14. Danese S, Tran J, D’Haens G, et al. Upadacitinib Induction and Maintenance Therapy Improves Abdominal Pain, Bowel Urgency, and Fatigue in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis: A Post Hoc Analysis of Phase 3 Data. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2023 Nov 2;29(11):1723–1729. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izad016

15. Danese S, Vermeire S, Zhou W, et al. Upadacitinib as induction and maintenance therapy for moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis: results from three phase 3, multicentre, double-blind, randomised trials. Lancet. 2022;399(10341):2113–2128. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00581-5

16. Burmester GR, Cohen SB, Winthrop KL, et al. Safety profile of upadacitinib over 15 000 patient-years across rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis and atopic dermatitis. RMD Open. 2023;9(1):e002735. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2022-002735

17. Panes J, Loftus EJ, Lacerda A, et al. S37 efficacy and safety of upadacitinib maintenance therapy in patients with moderately to severely active Crohn’s disease: U-ENDURE phase 3 results. Am J Gastroenterol. 2022;117:S10. doi: 10.14309/01.ajg.0000897656.25080.34

18. Din S, Selinger CP, Black CJ, et al. Systematic review with network meta-analysis: Risk of Herpes zoster with biological therapies and small molecules in inflammatory bowel disease. Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 2023;57:666–675.


Review

For citations:


Knyazev O.V., Belousova E.A., Vykova B.A., Kagramanova A.V., Lomakina E.Yu., Bakhtina Yu.V., Sergeeva K.A., Tishaeva I.A. Experience with upadacitinib using in treatment of ulcerative colitis in real clinical practice (pooled data). Koloproktologia. 2025;24(2):86-93. https://doi.org/10.33878/2073-7556-2025-24-2-86-93

Views: 310


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-7556 (Print)
ISSN 2686-7303 (Online)