Preview

Koloproktologia

Advanced search

Early outcomes of preoperative chemotherapy combined with targeted therapy for rectal cancer

https://doi.org/10.33878/2073-7556-2025-24-2-76-83

Abstract

AIM: to assess early efficacy and tolerability of preoperative chemotherapy combined with targeted therapy in patients with rectal cancer (RC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS: a pilot prospective study including 22 RC patients with KRAS wild-type gene is ongoing from 2021. There are 13 (59.1%) females and 9 (40.9%) males. Stage II RC was diagnosed in 2 (9.1%) patients and stage III RC in 20 (90.9%) patients. All patients received 6 cycles of mFOLFOX 6 chemotherapy combined with cetuximab targeted therapy followed by surgery. After completion of surgical treatment, patients with T4 and/or N + received adjuvant chemotherapy for 6 months (taking into account the time of preoperative treatment).

RESULTS: the completion rate of preoperative treatment was 90.9%, and a 15% reduction in drug dosages was required in 9.1% of patients. Adverse events were observed in 45.4% of patients. Grade III toxicity was noted in 13.6% of patients (neutropenia in 9.1% and skin rash in 4.5%). The clinical and radiological response to preoperative chemo-targeted therapy was 77.3%, including complete (9.1%) and partial (68.2%) tumor regression. All patients underwent radical surgery. The rate of postoperative complications was 13.6%. Grade I and grade IIIa complications (according to Сlavien-Dindo classification) were observed in 9.1% and 4.5% of cases. Pathological complete response (pCR, according to Mandard TRG 1) was achieved in 13.6% of patients, and good pathological response (TRG 1-2) was observed in 31.8% of patients.

CONCLUSION: preoperative chemotherapy combined with targeted therapy in RC patients with the wild type of the KRAS gene has a pronounced damaging effect on the tumor, and an acceptable toxicity profile does not affect intraand postoperative period. The short-term outcomes have been found to be encouraging. The study is ongoing to analyze the survival of patients.

About the Authors

A. Yu. Dobrodeev
Cancer Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Aleksey Yu. Dobrodeev

Kooperativny per., 5, Tomsk, 634009



A. S. Tarasova
Cancer Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Anna S. Tarasova

Kooperativny per., 5, Tomsk, 634009



S. G. Afanasyev
Cancer Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Sergey G. Afanasyev

Kooperativny per., 5, Tomsk, 634009



D. N. Kostromitsky
Cancer Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Dmitry N. Kostromitsky

Kooperativny per., 5, Tomsk, 634009



A. A. Ponomareva
Cancer Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Anastasia A. Ponomareva

Kooperativny per., 5, Tomsk, 634009



N. N. Babyshkina
Cancer Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Siberian State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

Natalia N. Babyshkina

Kooperativny per., 5, Tomsk, 634009; Moskovsky trakt, 2, Tomsk, 634050



T. A. Dronova
Cancer Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Tatyana A. Dronova

Kooperativny per., 5, Tomsk, 634009



I. V. Larionova
Cancer Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Irina V. Larionova

Kooperativny per., 5, Tomsk, 634009



N. V. Yunusova
Cancer Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Siberian State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

Natalia V. Yunusova

Kooperativny per., 5, Tomsk, 634009; Moskovsky trakt, 2, Tomsk, 634050



References

1. Kaprin A.D., et al. Malignant neoplasms in Russia in 2023 (morbidity and mortality). Moscow: P.A. Herzen Moscow Medical Research Institute — branch of the Federal State Budgetary Instituition. 2024; 276 p. (In Russ.).

2. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209–249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660

3. Nevolskikh A.A., Avdeenko V.A., Belokhvostova A.S., et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for treatment patients with rectal cancer with adverse prognostic factors: A review. Journal of Modern Oncology. 2022;24(3):389–398. (In Russ.). doi: 10.26442/18151434.2022.3.201806

4. Fedyanin M.Yu., Tryakin A.A. Neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer. Tazovaya Khirurgiya i Onkologiya = Pelvic Surgery and Oncology. 2022;12(2):36–45. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17650/2686-9594-2022-12-2-36-45

5. Wolff HA, Conradi LC, Beissbarth T, et al. German Rectal Cancer Study Group. Gender affects acute organ toxicity during radiochemotherapy for rectal cancer: long-term results of the German CAO/ ARO/AIO-94 phase III trial. Radiother Oncol. 2013 Jul;108(1):48–54. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2013.05.009

6. Downing A, Glaser AW, Finan PJ, et al. Functional Outcomes and Health-Related Quality of Life After Curative Treatment for Rectal Cancer: A Population-Level Study in England. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 Apr 1;103(5):1132–1142. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.12.005

7. Deng Y, Chi P, Lan P, et al. Neoadjuvant modified FOLFOX6 with or without radiation versus fluorouracil plus radiation for locally advanced rectal cancer: final results of the Chinese FOWARC trial. J Clin Oncol. 2019 Dec 1;37(34):3223–3233. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.02309

8. Liang Z, Zhang Z, Wu D, et al. Effects of Preoperative Radiotherapy on Long-Term Bowel Function in Patients With Rectal Cancer Treated With Anterior Resection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2022 Jan-Dec;21:15330338221105156. doi: 10.1177/15330338221105156

9. Weng S, Zhong C, Sun W, et al. Preoperative treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer: less is more. Med Comm. 2023 Dec 7;4(6):e443. doi: 10.1002/mco2.443

10. Altomare NJ, Mulcahy MF. Evolution of therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2024 Jan;129(1):78–84. doi: 10.1002/jso.27531

11. Bahadoer R, Djkstra A, Ettent B, et al. Short-course radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy before total mesorectal excision (TME) versus preoperative chemoradiotherapy, TME, and optional adjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer (RAPIDO): a randomised, open-label, phase3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2021;22:29–42. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30555-6

12. Schrag D, Shi Q, Weiser MR, et al. Preoperative Treatment of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2023 Jul 27;389(4):322–334. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2303269

13. Fernandez-Martos C, Brown G, Estevan R, et al. Preoperative chemotherapy in patients with intermediate-risk rectal adenocarcinoma selected by high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging: the GEMCAD 0801 Phase II Multicenter Trial. Oncologist. 2014 Oct;19(10):1042–3. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0233

14. Schrag D, Weiser MR, Goodman KA, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy without routine use of radiation therapy for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: a pilot trial. J Clin Oncol. 2014 Feb 20;32(6):513–8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.51.7904

15. Aoyama R, Hida K, Hasegawa S, et al. Long-term results of a phase 2 study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with molecularly targeted agents for locally advanced rectal cancer. Int J Clin Oncol. 2023 Mar;28(3):392–399. doi: 10.1007/s10147-023-02291-4

16. Hasegawa S, Goto S, Matsumoto T, et al. A Multicenter Phase 2 Study on the Feasibility and Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Without Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Nov;24(12):3587–3595. doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-5967-3

17. Toritani K, Watanabe J, Suwa Y, et al. A prospective, single-arm, multicenter trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with mFOLFOX6 plus panitumumab without radiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2020 Dec;35(12):2197–2204. doi: 10.1007/s00384-020-03693-w

18. Fernandez-Martos C, Pericay C, Maurel J, et al. Phase II trial of neoadjuvant mFOLFOX 6 with panitumumab (P) in T3 rectal cancer with clear mesorectal fascia (MRF) and KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, PI3KCA wild type (4WT). GEMCAD 1601 PIER trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2021;39:15_suppl.3512. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.351


Supplementary files

Review

For citations:


Dobrodeev A.Yu., Tarasova A.S., Afanasyev S.G., Kostromitsky D.N., Ponomareva A.A., Babyshkina N.N., Dronova T.A., Larionova I.V., Yunusova N.V. Early outcomes of preoperative chemotherapy combined with targeted therapy for rectal cancer. Koloproktologia. 2025;24(2):76-83. https://doi.org/10.33878/2073-7556-2025-24-2-76-83

Views: 304


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-7556 (Print)
ISSN 2686-7303 (Online)