The impact of anastomotic leakage on the quality of life of patients after surgery for rectal cancer
https://doi.org/10.33878/2073-7556-2024-23-2-117-123
Abstract
AIM: to assess the impact of colorectal anastomotic leakage on the severity of low anterior rectal resection syndrome and the quality of life.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: the results of 375 patients with rectal tumors were analyzed. In 26 patients, surgery was complicated by anastomosis failure. For a assessment of the quality of life of patients with anastomotic leakage, each patient was matched with a pair from the group of respondents with an uncomplicated postoperative period. The quality of life was assessed in all patients using the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire with the Cr-29 module.
RESULTS: patients with anastomosis leakage have more severe low anterior rectal resection syndrome — 29 (17;34), versus 20 (9;28) points (p = 0.03) and a lower global score (p = 0.01), physical (p = 0.01) and social (p = 0.04) functioning. The symptom scales of the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, supplemented by the Cr-29 module, had significant differences between groups on the scales of body image (p = 0.01), fecal incontinence (p = 0.04) and embarrassment (p = 0.01).
CONCLUSION: colorectal anastomosis leakage negatively affects the quality of life of patients.
About the Authors
E. A. KhomyakovRussian Federation
Salyama Adilya st., 2, Moscow, 123423, Russia
Barrikadnaya st., 2/1, Moscow, 125993, Russia
E. G. Rybakov
Russian Federation
Salyama Adilya st., 2, Moscow, 123423, Russia
O. I. Sushkov
Russian Federation
Salyama Adilya st., 2, Moscow, 123423, Russia
References
1. Rahbari NN, Weitz J, Hohenberger W, et al. Definition and grading of anastomotic leakage following anterior resection of the rectum: a proposal by the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer. Surgery. 2010;147:339–51. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2009.10.012
2. Alekseev M.V., Rybakov E.G., Achkasov S.I. Fluorescence angiography in colorectal surgery. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery = Khirurgiya. Zurnalim. N.I. Pirogova. 2023; (9-2):58–62. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17116/hirurgia202309258
3. Ellis CT, Maykel JA. Defining Anastomotic Leak and the Clinical Relevance of Leaks. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2021;34(6):359–365. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1735265
4. Ramphal W, Boeding JRE, Gobardhan PD, et al. Oncologic outcome and recurrence rate following anastomotic leakage after curative resection for colorectal cancer. Surg Oncol. 2018;27(4):730–6. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2018.10.003
5. Plastiras A, Korkolis D, Frountzas M, et al. The effect of anastomotic leak on postoperative pelvic function and quality of life in rectal cancer patients. Discov Oncol. 2022;13(1):52. doi: 10.1007/s12672-022-00518-w
6. Mongin C, Maggiori L, Agostini J, et al. Does anastomotic leakage impair functional results and quality of life after laparoscopic sphincter-saving total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer? A case-matched study. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2014;29(4):459–67. doi: 10.1007/s00384-014-1833-y
7. Arron MNN, Custers JAE, van Goor H, et al. The association between anastomotic leakage and health-related quality of life after colorectal cancer surgery. Colorectal Dis. 2023;25(7):1381–1391. doi: 10.1111/codi.16543
8. Theodoropoulos GE, Papanikolaou IG, Karantanos T, et al. Post-colectomy assessment of gastrointestinal function: a prospective study on colorectal cancer patients. Tech Coloproctol. 2013;17(5):525–36. doi: 10.1007/s10151-013-1008-9
9. Hain E, Manceau G, Maggiori L, et al. Bowel dysfunction after anastomotic leakage in laparoscopic sphincter-saving operative intervention for rectal cancer: a casematched study in 46 patients using the low anterior resection score. Surgery. 2017;161(04):1028–1039. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.09.037
Review
For citations:
Khomyakov E.A., Rybakov E.G., Sushkov O.I. The impact of anastomotic leakage on the quality of life of patients after surgery for rectal cancer. Koloproktologia. 2024;23(2):117-123. https://doi.org/10.33878/2073-7556-2024-23-2-117-123