Preview

Koloproktologia

Advanced search

Сontrolled circular dilatation and lateral subcutaneous sphincterotomy for chronic anal fissures associated with hemorrhoids III-IV

https://doi.org/10.33878/2073-7556-2024-23-1-42-51

Abstract

AIM: to evaluate the results of treatment of chronic anal fissure in combination with grade 3–4 hemorrhoids. PATIENTS AND METHODS: the prospective randomized study included 94 patients with chronic anal fissure in combination with grade 3–4 hemorrhoids, which had randomized in two groups. Forty-eight patients in the main group underwent controlled circular dilation (CCD) and 46 patients in the control group underwent lateral subcutaneous sphincterotomy (BPS). In both groups, patient underwent chronic anal fissure excision and surgical treatment of hemorrhoids.

RESULTS: the postoperative pain in group CCD was significantly lower than in the BPS group during all 7 days after surgery (p = 0.0085; p = 0.0001 — on the second and the 7th days, respectively). On the 7th day after surgery according to the profilometry the CCD method was more effective in liquidation internal sphincter hypertonia (p = 0.01), on the 45th — both methods were comparable (p = 0.27). On the 45th day after the surgery, values of rest intraanal pressure describing of the CCD and BPS methods had a comparable effect on internal anal sphincter function (p = 0.45), as well as the external sphincter (p > 0.05). On the 45th after surgery, the rate of postoperative wounds healing in the BPS group was 100%, in the CCD group — 85.4% (p = 0.02). Perineal hematoma was statistically more common in the BPS group (p = 0.014). In the frequency of the incidence anal incontinence clinical manifestations (AI) on the 45th day, CCD and BPS groups were comparable (p = 0.84).

CONCLUSION: CCD and BPS methods of internal anal sphincter hypertonia liquidation are comparable in the effectiveness, the overall incidence of postoperative complications, including temporary AI. The advantages of CCD method are a lesser pain syndrome and a low incidence of perineal hematoma in the near postoperative period.

About the Authors

Z. Z. Kamaeva
Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education
Russian Federation

Barrikadnaya st., 2/1, Moscow, 125993



A. Yu. Titov
Ryzhikh National Medical Research Center of Coloproctology
Russian Federation

Salyama Adilya st., 2, Moscow, 123423



R. Yu. Khryukin
Ryzhikh National Medical Research Center of Coloproctology
Russian Federation

Salyama Adilya st., 2, Moscow, 123423



I. S. Anosov
Ryzhikh National Medical Research Center of Coloproctology

Salyama Adilya st., 2, Moscow, 123423



Yu. A. Shelygin
Ryzhikh National Medical Research Center of Coloproctology; Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education
Russian Federation

Salyama Adilya st., 2, Moscow, 123423

Barrikadnaya st., 2/1, Moscow, 125993



References

1. Agapov M.A., Aliev F.Sh., Achkasov S.I., et al. Clinical guidelines. Anal fissure. Koloproctologia. 2021;20(4):10–21. (in Russ.). DOI: 10.33878/2073-7556-2021-20-4-10-21

2. Ektov V.N. Treatment of anal fissures with lateral subcutaneous sphincterotomy. Abstract diss. cand. med. sciences. 1984; M., 157p. (in Russ.).

3. García-Granero E, Sanahuja A, García-Armengol J, et al. Anal endosonographic evaluation after closed lateral subcutaneous sphincterotomy. Dis Colon Rectum. 1998,41(5):598–601. DOI: 10.1007/BF02235266

4. Nelson R, Manuel D, Gumienny C, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the treatment of anal fissure. Tech Coloproctol. 2017,21(8):605–625. DOI: 10.1007/s10151-017-1664-2

5. Boland PA, Kelly ME, Donlon NE, et al. Management options for chronic anal fissure: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. International Journal of Colorectal Disease. 2020,35:1807–1815. DOI: 10.1007/s00384-020-03699-4

6. Khryukin R.Yu., Zharkov E.E., Goloktionov N.A., et al. Treatment of chronic anal fissure botulinum toxin type A 40 U in comparison with lateral subcutaneous sphincterotomy (NCT03855046). Koloproktologia. 2022;21(1):60–70. (in Russ.). DOI: 10.33878/2073-7556-2022-21-1-60-70

7. Ebinger SM, Hardt J, Warschkow R, et al. Operative and medical treatment of chronic anal fissures-a review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Gastroenterol. 2017,52(6):663–676. DOI: 10.1007/s00535-017-1335-0.

8. Tkalich O.V., Ponomarenko A.A., Fomenko O.Yu., et al. Immediate results of complex treatment of chronic anal fissure using botulinum toxin type A (ISRCTN 97413456). Koloproktologia. 2020;19(1):80–99. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.33878/2073-7556-2020-19-1-80-99

9. Nelson RL. Operative procedures for fissure in ano. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010,11:Cd002199. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002199.pub4.

10. Kamaeva Z.Z., TitovA.Yu., Ponomareenko A.A., et al. The place of dilatation methods and lateral subcutaneous sphincterotomy for the internal anal sphincter spasm liquidation (systematic literature review and meta-analyses). Chirurg. 2022;7(8):19–30. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.33920/med-15-2204-03

11. Titov A.Yu., Bagdasaryan S.L., Orlova L.P., et al. Pneumodivulsion of the anal sphincter in the surgical treatment of chronic anal fissure. Koloproctologia. 2009;1:10–14. (In Russ.).

12. Gul T, Khan MM, Khan MA, et al. Comparison of controlled-intermittent anal dilatation and lateral internal sphincterotomy in the treatment of chronic anal fissures: a prospective randomized study. Pak J Surg. 2016,32(4):218–222. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2009.03.006.

13. Garcia-Aguilar J, Belmonte C, Wong WD, et al. Open vs. closed sphincterotomy for chronic anal fissure: long-term results. Dis Colon Rectum. 1996,39(4):440–443.

14. Brown CJ, Dubreuil D, Santoro L, et al. Lateral internal sphincterotomy is superior to topical nitroglycerin for healing chronic anal fissure and does not compromise long-term fecal continence: six-year follow-up of a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum. 2007,50(4):442–448. DOI: 10.1007/s10350-006-0844-3

15. Jensen SL, Lund F, Nielsen OV, et al. Lateral subcutaneous sphincterotomy versus anal dilatation in the treatment of fissure in ano in outpatients: a prospective randomised study. Br Med J. (Clin. Res. Ed.). 1984,289(6444):528–530. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.289.6444.528

16. Boschetto S, Giovannone M, Tosoni M, et al. Hydropneumatic anal dilation in conservative treatment of chronic anal fissure: clinical outcomes and randomized comparison with topical nitroglycerin. Tech Coloproctology. 2004,8(2):89–92. DOI: 10.1007/s10151-004-0062-8.

17. Renzi A, Izzo D, Di Sarno G, et al. Clinical, manometric, and ultrasonographic results of pneumatic balloon dilatation vs. lateral internal sphincterotomy for chronic anal fissure: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008,51(1):121–127. DOI: 10.1007/s10350-007-9162-7

18. Pinsk I, Czeiger D, Lichtman D, et al. The long-term effect of standardized anal dilatation for chronic anal fissure on anal continence. Ann Coloproctol. 2021,37(2):115–119.DOI: 10.3393/ac.2020.03.16.

19. Shelygin Y.A., Frolov S.A., Orlova L.P., et al. Immediate results of comprehensive treatment of chronic anal fissure. Koloproctologia. 2010;1(31):4–9. (In Russ.).

20. Shelygin Y.A., Frolov S.A., Titov A.Yu., et al. Anal incontinence in patients undergoing anal fissure excision in combination with lateral subcutaneous sphincterotomy. Koloproctologia. 2008;3:18–24. (In Russ.).

21. Fischer M, Thermann M, Trobisch M, et al. Treatment of primary chronic fissure-in-ano by anal dilatation versus sphincterotomy: A double-blind, randomized, controlled trial. Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1976,343:35–44. DOI: 10.1007/BF01261568


Review

For citations:


Kamaeva Z.Z., Titov A.Yu., Khryukin R.Yu., Anosov I.S., Shelygin Yu.A. Сontrolled circular dilatation and lateral subcutaneous sphincterotomy for chronic anal fissures associated with hemorrhoids III-IV. Koloproktologia. 2024;23(1):42-51. https://doi.org/10.33878/2073-7556-2024-23-1-42-51

Views: 589


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-7556 (Print)
ISSN 2686-7303 (Online)