Preview

Koloproktologia

Advanced search

Results of rectal resection in metastatic cancer

https://doi.org/10.33878/2073-7556-2024-23-1-52-58

Abstract

AIM: to evaluate results of rectal resection in metastatic rectal cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: a retrospective analysis of the results of treatment of 84 patients with symptomatic rectal cancer at stage IV, who underwent rectal resection in 2015-2020.

RESULTS: anastomotic leak developed in 5 (5.9%) patients. Postoperative mortality rate was 1 (1.2%). Ileostomy closure was performed in 66 patients (78.6%) 17.9 months after initial surgery. Progression of the disease was detected in 60 (71.4%) patients at following organs: liver (42.9%), peritoneum (19%), lungs (15.5%). Stabilization was significantly higher after systemic chemotherapy before and after perioperative chemotherapy comparing to patients who had preoperative radiation (p = 0.013). Proportional Cox regression model risks showed that the chances of death in patients with advanced rectal cancer after surgery was 4.1 times higher for peritoneal carcinomatosis, 2.9 times for liver metastases and 1.5 for multi organ metastasis.

CONCLUSION: low anterior resection with defunctioning ileostomy is associated with acceptable anastomotic leak rate (5.9%) and mortality (1.2%). Systemic chemotherapy in combination with target agents is preferable initial treatment in patients with metastatic rectal cancer.

About the Authors

O. I. Kit
National Medical Research Center of Oncology
Russian Federation

str. 14th line, 63, Rostov-on-Don, 344037



Yu. A. Gevorkyan
National Medical Research Center of Oncology
Russian Federation

str. 14th line, 63, Rostov-on-Don, 344037



N. V. Soldatkina
National Medical Research Center of Oncology
Russian Federation

str. 14th line, 63, Rostov-on-Don, 344037



E. N. Kolesnikov
National Medical Research Center of Oncology
Russian Federation

str. 14th line, 63, Rostov-on-Don, 344037



M. A. Gusareva
National Medical Research Center of Oncology
Russian Federation

str. 14th line, 63, Rostov-on-Don, 344037



O. K. Bondarenko
National Medical Research Center of Oncology
Russian Federation

str. 14th line, 63, Rostov-on-Don, 344037



A. E. Anisimov
National Medical Research Center of Oncology
Russian Federation

str. 14th line, 63, Rostov-on-Don, 344037



L. Y. Vladimirova
National Medical Research Center of Oncology
Russian Federation

str. 14th line, 63, Rostov-on-Don, 344037



References

1. Skipenko O.G., Shelygina Yu.A., Achkasova S.I. Metastatic colorectal cancer. M., 2020. 424c.

2. Sarah B, Stringfield SB, Fleshman JW. Specialization improves outcomes in rectal cancer surgery. Surg Oncol. 2021;37:101568. DOI:10.1016/j.suronc.2021.101568.

3. Van Cutsem E, Nordlinger B, Adam R, et al. Towards a pan-European consensus on the treatment of patients with colorectal liver metastases. Eur J Cancer. 2006;42(14):2212-2221. DOI:10.1016/j.ejca.2006.04.012.

4. Adam R, de Gramont A, Figueras J et al. of the EGOSLIM (Expert Group on OncoSurgery management of LIver Metastases) group. Managing synchronous liver metastases from colorectal cancer: a multidisciplinary international consensus. Cancer Treat Rev. 2015 Nov;41(9):729-41. DOI:10.1016/j.ctrv.2015.06.006.

5. Kit O.I., Gevorkyan Yu.A., Soldatkina N.V. et al. Frequency and spectrum of KRAS gene mutations in advanced colorectal cancer. Clinical and morphological features. Molecular Medicine, 2015, No. 5, pp. 26-29. Available by https://molmedjournal.ru/ru/24999490-2015-05-05 (accessed: 20.01.2023).

6. Vodolazhsky D.I., Antonets A.V., Dvadnenko K.V. and coauthors. The relationship of KRAS gene mutations with clinical and pathological features of colorectal cancer in patients in the south of Russia. International Journal of Experimental Education, 2014, No.1-1, pp. 65-68. Available by https://expeducation.ru/ru/article/view?id=4517 (date of address: 20.01.2023).

7. Kit O.I., Gevorkyan Yu.A., Soldatkina N.V. and co. Results of repeated liver resections in metastatic colorectal cancer. Surgery. Magazine named after N.I. Pirogov. 2022, No. 8, pp. 45-52. DOI:10.17116/surgery 202208145.

8. Ahmad NZ, Abbas MH, Khan SU et al. A meta-analysis of the role of diverting ileostomy after rectal cancer surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2021 Mar;36(3):445-455. DOI:10.1007/s00384-020-03771-z.

9. Tao K, Gao J, Wei Z et al. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery. 2018 Apirl 25;21 (4):384-387. Chinese. PMID: 29682707.

10. Kit O.I., Gevorkyan Yu.A., Soldatkina N.V. et al. Hardware interstitial anastomosis in colorectal cancer: immediate results. Coloproctology. 2016, No. 1 (55), pp. 48-53. DOI:10.33878/2073-7556-2016-0-1-48-53.

11. Kopetz S, Chang G.J, Overman M.J. et al. Improved survival in metastatic colorectal cancer is associated with adoption of hepatic resection and improved chemotherapy. J Clinical Oncol, 2009; 27(22): 3677-83. DOI:10.1200/JCO.2008.20.5278.

12. Dossa F, Acuna SA, Rickles AS. et al. Association Between Adjuvant Chemotherapy and Overall Survival in Patients With Rectal Cancer and Pathological Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Resection. 2018; 4 (7): 930-937. DOI:10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.5597.

13. Joye I., Haustermans K. Which Patients With Rectal Cancer Do Not Need Radiotherapy? Semin Radiat Oncol. 2016 Jul;26(3):199-204. DOI:10.1016/j.semradonc.2016.02.006.

14. Tataryn B, Kryzhanivska A, Dyakiv I, Andriiv A. Survival of patients with rectal cancer. Wiad Lek. 2021;74(9 cz 1):2044-2051. PMID: 34725274.


Supplementary files

Review

For citations:


Kit O.I., Gevorkyan Yu.A., Soldatkina N.V., Kolesnikov E.N., Gusareva M.A., Bondarenko O.K., Anisimov A.E., Vladimirova L.Y. Results of rectal resection in metastatic cancer. Koloproktologia. 2024;23(1):52-58. https://doi.org/10.33878/2073-7556-2024-23-1-52-58

Views: 507


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-7556 (Print)
ISSN 2686-7303 (Online)