Comparative characteristics of scales for assessing the quality of life of stoma patients (review)
https://doi.org/10.33878/2073-7556-2023-22-3-134-139
Abstract
AIM: to compare various scales for assessing the quality of life of stoma patients in order to provide the most complete and objective assessment.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: literature sources from the medical databases PubMed, MedLine, Scopus were analyzed. The studied literature sources were published in different countries, which made it possible to identify both global and country-specific criteria for assessing the quality of life of patients.
CONCLUSION: the specific SQOLS and Stoma-QOL scales are of the greatest scientific and practical value, and the nonspecific SF-36 scale does not lose its scientific significance. These scales are most often used in various medical and scientific institutions to study the life of ostomy patients. They are simple and easy to use, their reliability and validity have been proven by specially conducted studies.
About the Authors
R. I. Babazada
First St. Petersburg State Medical University named after Academician I.P. Pavlov
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Rza Ilgar oglu Babazada — 2-year clinical intern
Lev Tolstoy st., 6-8, St. Petersburg, 197022
A. A. Vaganov
First St. Petersburg State Medical University named after Academician I.P. Pavlov
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Alexey A. Vaganov — PhD, surgeon
Lev Tolstoy st., 6-8, St. Petersburg, 197022
V. P. Morozov
First St. Petersburg State Medical University named after Academician I.P. Pavlov
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Viktor P. Morozov — M.D., Professor
Lev Tolstoy st., 6-8, St. Petersburg, 197022
A. Yu. Korolkov
First St. Petersburg State Medical University named after Academician I.P. Pavlov
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Andrey Yu. Korolkov — M.D., Professor
Lev Tolstoy st., 6-8, St. Petersburg, 197022
References
1. Nilsson LO, Kock NG, Kylberg F, Myrvold HE, Palselius I. Sexual adjustment in ileostomy patients before and after conversion to continent ileostomy. Dis Colon Rectum 1981;24:287–90.
2. Follick MJ, Smith TW, Turk DC. Psychosocial adjustment following ostomy. Health Psychol 1984;3:505–17.
3. Foulis W, Mayberry JF. Elderly ileostomists and their social problems. J Clin Gastroenterol 1990;12:276–8.
4. Gerharz EW, Weingartner K, Dopatka T, Kohl UN, Basler HD, Riedmiller HN. Quality of life after cystectomy and urinary diversion: results of a retrospective interdisciplinary study. J Urol 1997;158:778–85.
5. Walsh BA, Grunert BK, Telford GL, Otterson MF. Multidisciplinary management of altered body image in the patient with an ostomy. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 1995;22:227–36.
6. Nugent KP, Daniels P, Stewart B, Patankar R, Johnson CD. Quality of life in stoma patients. Dis Colon Rectum 1999;42:1569–74.
7. Bekkers MJ, van Knippenberg FC, van den Borne HW, Poen H, Bergsma J, van Berge-Henegouwen GP. Psychosocial adaptation to stoma surgery: a review. J Behav Med 1995;18:1–31.
8. Camilleri-Brennan J, Steele RJ. Prospective analysis of quality of life after reversal of a defunctioning loop ileostomy. Colorectal Dis 2002;4:167–71.
9. O’Leary DP, Fide CJ, Foy C, Lucarotti ME. Quality of life after low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision and temporary loop ileostomy for rectal carcinoma. Br J Surg 2001;88:1216–20.
10. Kuzu MA, Topcu O, Ucar K, et al. Effect of sphinctersacrificing surgery for rectal carcinoma on quality of life in Muslim patients. Dis Colon Rectum 2002;45:1359–66.
11. Sprangers MA, Taal BG, Aaronson NK, te Velde A. Quality of life in colorectal cancer. Stoma vs. nonstoma patients. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:361–9.
12. Bekkers MJ, van Knippenberg FC, van Dulmen AM, van den Borne HW, van Berge Henegouwen GP. Survival and psychosocial adjustment to stoma surgery and nonstoma bowel resection: a 4-year follow-up. J Psychosom Res 1997;42:235–44.
13. Camilleri-Brennan J, Steele RJ. Objective assessment of quality of life following panproctocolectomy and ileostomy for ulcerative colitis. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2001;83:321–4.
14. Nordin K, Pahlman L, Larsson K, Sundberg-Hjelm M, Loof L. Health-related quality of life and psychological distress in a population-based sample of Swedish patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Scand J Gastroenterol 2002;37:450–7.
15. Camilleri-Brennan J, Munro A, Steele RJ. Does an ileoanal pouch offer a better quality of life than a permanent ileostomy for patients with ulcerative colitis? J Gastrointest Surg 7:814–9.
16. Baxter, N. N., Novotny, P. J., Jacobson, T., Maidl, L. J., Sloan, J., & Young-Fadok, T. M. (2006). A Stoma Quality of Life Scale. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, 49(2), 205–212. doi:10.1007/s10350-005-0275-6
17. Katarzyna Szpilewska, Jan Juzwiszyn, Zofia Bolanowska, Magdalena Milan, Mariusz Chabowski, Dariusz Janczak (2018). Acceptance of disease and the quality of life in patients with enteric stoma Pol. Przegl. Chir 2018 Feb 28;90(1):13-17. doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0011.5954
18. Wuletaw Chane Zewude, Tilahun Derese, Yisihak Suga, Berhanetsehay Teklewold: Quality of Life in Patients Living with Stoma. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2021;31 (5):993. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/ejhs.v31i5. 11
19. Kement M, Gezen C, Aydin H, Haksal M, Can U, Aksakal N, Oncel M. A descriptive survey study to evaluate the relationship between socio-demographic factors and quality of life in patients with a permanent colostomy. Ostomy Wound Manage, 2014;60(10):18-23.
20. Zhang, Y., Xian, H., Yang, Y., Zhang, X., & Wang, X. (2019). Relationship between psychosocial adaptation and health‐related quality of life of patients with stoma: A descriptive, cross‐sectional study. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 28(15-16), 2880–2888. doi:10.1111/jocn.14876
21. Ernest Laia, Alexander Caston Peterson, Guiping Liu, Ahmer Karimuddin, R. Trafford Crump and Jason M. Sutherland: Psychometric validation of the Stoma-QOL questionnaire in a Canadian cross-sectional sample of colostomy and ileostomy patients. Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology 2018, VOL. 53, NO. 6, 721–726 https://doi.org/10.1080/00365521.2018.1457713.
22. Luis Prieto, Hanne Thorsen and Kristian Juul: Development and validation of a quality of life questionnaire for patients with colostomy or ileostomy. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes • October 2005 DOI: 10.1186/1477-7525-3-62
23. Yarlas, A., Bayliss, M., Cappelleri, J. C., Maher, S., Bushmakin, A. G., Chen, L. A., Healey, P. (2017). Psychometric validation of the SF-36® Health Survey in ulcerative colitis: results from a systematic literature review. Quality of Life Research, 27(2), 273–290. doi:10.1007/s11136-017-1690-6
24. WHO Program, “SINDI”, 2001. p.340
Review
For citations:
Babazada R.I., Vaganov A.A., Morozov V.P., Korolkov A.Yu. Comparative characteristics of scales for assessing the quality of life of stoma patients (review). Koloproktologia. 2023;22(3):134-139. https://doi.org/10.33878/2073-7556-2023-22-3-134-139
Views:
420
Email this article 
