FISTULA LASER ABLATION FOR ANAL FISTULAS (systematic review)

AIM: to reveal fistula healing incidence after application of FiLaC™ technique and factors that can affect it. MATERIALS AND METHODS: when searching electronic medical databases for publications that evaluated the results of the FiLaC™ technique in the treatment of anal fistula, 6 studies were selected, corresponding to the search queries. The search was carried out taking into account the principles of systematic literature reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA). The time interval for searching publications was between 2011 and October 2018. In the publications included in the analysis, the following parameters were evaluated: general characteristics of the study groups, technical aspects of the FiLaC™ technique, the site of the fistula in relation to the anal sphincter, the option of closing the internal fistula, the incidence of healing and recurrence of fistula, the duration of the follow-up period after surgery, re-operated cases of fistula recurrences. RESULTS: taking into account the data obtained in the analysis of the selected studies, the mean incidence of fistula healing was 64.5% (40.0-88.2)%. It was found that the only factors that can be used to assess their impact on the incidence of fistula healing were: the gender and the variant of the fistula site in relationship to the anal sphincter (transsphincteric/extrasphincteric). Statistical analysis and evaluation of the odds ratio revealed no effect on the treatment result of the above parameters. CONCLUSION: the analysis of the data showed that FiLaCis mainly indicated for the treatment of patients with extrasphincter and transsphincteric anal fistulas. The method can be recommended as a sphincter-sparing treatment in patients with initially weakened anal sphincter function and, consequently, with a high risk of anal sphincter insufficiency in the application of traditional techniques. Further evaluation of the treatment results in the treated period and their comparison with the results after other variants of coagulation of the fistula walls is required to obtain a clearer understanding of the effectiveness of the FiLAC technique.

fistula-in-ano, minimally invasive techniques, laser ablation

1. Kostarev I.V., Fomenko O.Yu., Titov A.Yu., Blagodarny L.A. et al. Clinical and manometric assessment of functional state of anal sphincter in patients after fistulectomy with primary sphincteroplasty. Koloproktologia. 2018; no. 4(66), pp. 31-38 (in Russ.)

2. Kostarev I.V., Shelygin Yu.A., Titov A.Yu. Treatment of fistula in ano by advancement FLAP. Is it outdated or still modern approach? Koloproktologia. 2016; no. 1(55), pp. 6-15. (in Russ.)

3. Abbas MA, Gamal MM, Tsay AT. Fistulotomy with primary anal sphincter repair is effective for complex fistula-in-ano. Colorectal Disease. 2015; 17(Suppl. 2): 11.

4. Roig JV, García-Armengol J, Jordan JC, Moro D et al. Fistulectomy and sphincteric reconstruction for complex cryptoglandular fistulas. Colorectal Dis. 2010;12: 145-152.

5. Arroyo A, Pérez-Legaz J, Moya P. Fistulotomy and sphincter reconstruction in the treatment of complex fistula-in-ano: long-term clinical and manometric results. Ann Surg. 2012; 255(5): 935-939. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31824e9112.

6. Cariati A. Fistulotomy or seton in anal fistula: a decisional algorithm. Updates Surg. 2013; 65(3): 201-205. 120.

7. Chuang-Wei C, Chang Chieh W, Cheng-Wen H, Tsai-YU L et al. Cutting seton for complex anal fistulas. Surgeon. 2008; 6: 185–188.

8. Dziki A, Dartos M. Seton treatment of anal fistula: experience with a new modification. Eur J Surg. 1998;164(7): 543-548.

9. Vatansev CA, Alabaz O, Tekin A, Aksoy F et al. New seton type for the treatment of anal fistula. Dig Dis Sci. 2007; 52(8):1920-1923.

10. Kuzminov A.M., Minbaev Sh.T., Korolik V.Yu., Orlova L.P. et al. Treatment of extrasphincteric anal fistulas with the use of bio-plastic material. Russian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Coloproctology. 2012; no. 5, pp. 76-82. (in Russ.)

11. Damian G, Dolores H. Expanded Adipose-Derived Stem Cells for the Treatment of Complex Perianal Fistula: a Phase II Clinical Trial. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52(1):79-86. DOI: 10.1007/ DCR.0b013e3181973487

12. Ellis CN, Clark S. Fibrin glue as an adjunct to flap repair of anal fistulas: a randomized, controlled study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006; 49:1736–1740. 13.

13. Meinero P, Mori L. Video-assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT): a novel sphincter-saving procedure for treating complex anal fistulas. Tech Coloproctol. 2011;15(4):417–422. DOI 10.1007/ s10151-011-0769-2.

14. Rojanasakul A, Pattanaarun J, Sahakitrungruang C, Tantiphlachiva K. Total anal sphincter saving technique for fistula-in-ano: the ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract. J Med Assoc Thai. 2007;90(3):581–586. http://www.medassocthai.org/journal.

15. Alexandre L, Eduardo F. et al. FILAC – Fistula – Tract Laser Closure: a sphincter-preserving procedure for the treatment of complex anal fistulas. JCOL. 2012; 37(2):160-162. DOI.org/10.1016/j. jcol.2017.03.001.

16. Giamundo P, Esercizio L, Geraci M, Tibaldi L et al. Fistula-tract Laser Closure (FiLaCTM): long-term results and new operative strategies. Tech Coloproctol. 2015; 19:449-453. DOI 10.1007/s10151-015-1282-9.

17. Ozturk E, Gulcu B. Laser ablation of Fistula Tract: A sphincter-preserving method for treating Fistula-in-Ano. Dis Colon Rectum. 2014; 57: 360-364. DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000067.

18. Mustafa CT, Cihan A et al. Closing Perianal Fistulas Using a Laser: Long-Term Results in 103 Patients. Dis Colon Rectum. 2018;61:5. 00–00. DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001038.

19. Wilhelm A, Fiebig A, Krawezak M. Five years of experience with the FiLaC laser for fistula-in-ano management long-term followup from a single institution. Tech Coloproctol. 2017. DOI 10.1007/ s10151-017-1599-7.

20. Wilhelm A. A new technique for sphincter-preserving anal fistula repair using a novel radial emitting laser probe. Tech Coloproctol. 2011;15: 445-449. DOI 10.1007/s10151-011-0726-0.

21. Liberati A, Altman DG et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ. 2009; 339. 2700. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/26694677.

22. Parks AG, Gordon PH, Hardcastle JD. A classification of fistulan-ano. Br J Surg. 1976; 63:1–12.

23. Khitariyan A.G., Kovalev S.A., Kislov V.A., Romodan N.A. et al. Results of treatment of transsphincteric and extrasphincteric fistulas with modified FiLAC technology. Herald urgent and restorative surgery. 2016; v. 1, no. 3, pp. 447-457. (in Russ.)

24. Hwang SA, Rustan IR, Shishkin VN, Ismailov II, Abdulaev RK. Our experience in treating chronic rectal fistulas with a laser scalpel, helium-neon laser therapy and lymphotropic antibiotic therapy. Actual issues of proctology: Abstracts of reports of the All-Union Conference. 1989; pp. 202-204.

25. Ellison GW, Bellan JR et al. Treatment of perianal fistulas with ND:YAG Laser-results in Twenty cases. Veterinary Surgery. 1995; 24:140-147.