Preview

Koloproktologia

Advanced search

LOW-VOLUME PEG PLUS ASCORBIC ACID AS BOWEL PREPARATION FOR COLONOSCOPY USING MORNING-ONLY DOSING REGIMEN COMPARED TO STANDARD SPLIT-DOSING: MULTICENTER SINGLE-BLIND RANDOMIZED PARALLEL-GROUP CONTROLLED STUDY

https://doi.org/10.33878/2073-7556-2017-0-2S-5-18

Abstract

BACKGROUND. According to guidelines the optimal delay between the last dose of purgative and colonoscopy is no longer than 2-4 hours. Morning-only dosing of polyethyleneglycol solution (PEG) prior to colonoscopy versus standard split-dosing with nocturnal pause may be more acceptable for patient. AIM. To compare the efficacy, safety and tolerability of morning-only dosing regimen of 2 liter PEG plus ascorbic acid solution (PEG + Asc) 2 L to split-dose PEG + Asc 2 L for bowel preparation prior to colonoscopy. METHODS. This was a multicenter prospective endoscopist-blinded randomized non-inferiority study comparing morning-only to split dosing with nocturnal pause regimen of PEG + Asc 2 L (MOVIPREP®) for the bowel preparation prior to colonoscopy. The primary endpoint was successful colon cleansing where «Success» represented grades of bowel cleansing А and В according to Harefield Cleansing Scale© (HCS©). Clinically relevant non-inferiority margin was set at -15 % with one-sided significance level of 5 %. Secondary endpoints were general satisfaction/acceptability ofpatients with the preparationfor colonoscopy, as well as patient compliance and safety of the study drug. RESULTS. Overall 140 patients from 6 centers were enrolled in the study and randomized into two groups of 70 each. ITT analysis showed successful colon cleansing in 94,3 % in the morning-only group versus 91,4 % in the split-dose group. An estimated treatment difference was 2,9 %, 95 % lower confidence limit for the difference -9,7 % with the prespecified non-inferiority margin -15 % (p for non-inferiority <0.001). Furthermore 71,4 % ofpatients had the highest grade A colon cleansing according to HCS© in each group. In patients in the morning-only intake group, the time to first bowel motion following the first liter of PEG + Asc 2 L was shorter, with a median time of 1.08 hours, compared with 1.58 hours in the split-dose group (p<0,001). Nearly all of the patients treated in the morning-only dosing group (69/70) and in the split-dose group (67/70) received the study medication as planned. In general, the study drug was well tolerated in patients of both groups. At least one treatment-emergent adverse event was reported by 58,6 % of patients in the morning-only dosing group and by 61,4 % of patients in the split dosing group. The most frequently reported adverse events were typical gastrointestinal disorders (53,5 % of patients) and changes in laboratory tests (12,1 % of patients). No serious adverse events were reported in this study. CONCLUSION. Morning-only dosing regimen of PEG + Asc 2 L is non-inferior to split-dosing regimen in terms of colon cleansing and is safe and convenient for use as a bowel preparation prior to colonoscopy.

About the Authors

V. V. Veselov
State Scientific Center of Coloproctology
Russian Federation


A. V. Sidorov
Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education «Yaroslavl State Medical University» of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation


V. B. Vasiluk
ZAO Outpatient hospital Complex
Russian Federation


A. V. Gordienko
FGBOU VPO «Military Medical Academy named for C.M. Kirov» of the Ministry of Defence of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation


I. L. Menshikov
Research Institute of Cardiology and Internal Medicine of the Ministry of Health of the RK
Russian Federation


V. I. Simanenko
City Clinical Hospital № 26
Russian Federation


P. L. Shchserbakov
FGBU Federal Scientific and Clinical Centre of Physical and Chemical Medicine FMBA of Russia
Russian Federation


References

1. Bernstein, C. A prospective study of factors that determine cecal intubation time at colonoscopy. / C. Bernstein, M. Thorn, K. Monsees et al. // Gastrointest. Endoscop. - 2005; 61: 72-5.

2. Belsey, J. Systematic review: Oral bowel preparation for colonoscopy. / J. Belsey, O. Epstein, D. Heresbach // Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. - 2007; 25: 373-84.

3. Radaelli, F. High-dose senna compared with conventional PEG-ES lavage as bowel preparation for elective colonoscopy: A prospective, randomized, investigator-blinded trial. / F. Radaelli, G. Meucci, G. Imperiali et al. // Am. J. Gastroenterol. - 2005; 100: 2674-80.

4. Hassan, C. Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: ESGE Guideline. / C. Hassan, M. Bretthauer, M.F. Kaminski et al. // Endoscopy. - 2013; 45: 142-150.

5. Vitamin C. Water soluble vitamins. Vitamin and Mineral Safety. John Hathcock. - 2004.

6. Ell, C. Randomized Trial of Low-Volume PEG Solution Versus Standard PEG + Electrolytes for Bowel Cleansing Before Colonoscopy. / C. Ell, W. Fischbach, H-J. Bronisch et al. // American Journal of Gastroenterology. - 2008; 103 (4): 883-93.

7. Matro, R. Efficacy of morning-only compared with split-dose polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution for afternoon colonoscopy: a randomized controlled single-blind study. / R. Matro, A. Shnitser, M. Spodik et al. // Am. J. Gastroenterol. - 2010; 105 (9): 1954-61.

8. Halphen, M. Validation of the Harefield Cleansing Scale: a tool for the evaluation of bowel cleansing quality in both research and clinical practice. / M. Halphen, D. Heresbach, H.J. Gruss et al. // Gastrointest. Endosc. - 2013; 78 (1): 121-31.

9. Belsey, J. Meta-analysis: the relative efficacy of oral bowel preparations for colonoscopy 1985-2010. / J. Belsey, C. Crosta, O. Epstein et al. // Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. - 2012; 35: 222-37.

10. Beck, D.E. Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy. / D.E. Beck // Clin. Colon Rectal Surg. - 2010; 23: 10-13.

11. Подготовка пациентов к эндоскопическому исследованию толстой кишки. Клинические рекомендации РОСЭНДО. 2 изд. М., 2011.

12. Bowel preparation before colonoscopy. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Guidelines. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. - 2015; 81 (4): 781-74.

13. Bitoun, A. et al. Results of a prospective randomised multicentre controlled trial comparing a new 2-L ascorbic acid plus polyethylene glycol and electrolyte solution vs. sodium phosphate solution in patients undergoing elective colonoscopy. / A.Bitoun et al. on behalf of the NORCOL group. // Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. - 2006; 24 (11-12): 1631-42.

14. Worthington, J. A randomised controlled trial of a new 2 litre polyethylene glycol solution versus sodium picosulphate + magnesium citrate solution for bowel cleansing prior to colonoscopy. / J. Worthington et al. // Current Medical Research and Opinion. -2008; 24 (2): 481-8.

15. Rossander-Hulthen, L. Dietary factors influencing iron absorption - an overview. / Rossander-L. Hulthen, L. Hallberg // In: Iron nutrition in health and disease. Hallberg L., Asp N.G., eds. London: John Libbey & Company Ltd. - 1996: 105-15.


Review

For citations:


Veselov V.V., Sidorov A.V., Vasiluk V.B., Gordienko A.V., Menshikov I.L., Simanenko V.I., Shchserbakov P.L. LOW-VOLUME PEG PLUS ASCORBIC ACID AS BOWEL PREPARATION FOR COLONOSCOPY USING MORNING-ONLY DOSING REGIMEN COMPARED TO STANDARD SPLIT-DOSING: MULTICENTER SINGLE-BLIND RANDOMIZED PARALLEL-GROUP CONTROLLED STUDY. Koloproktologia. 2017;(2S):5-18. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33878/2073-7556-2017-0-2S-5-18

Views: 1222


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-7556 (Print)
ISSN 2686-7303 (Online)