RESULTS OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ENHANCED RECOVERY PROGRAM IN COLOPROCTOLOGY
https://doi.org/10.33878/2073-7556-2018-0-2-32-38
Abstract
AIM. Evaluation of the results of the implementation of ERP in practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Two consecutive series of patients were analyzed. The first cohort was recruited in 2013-2015 (n=124), the second - in 2015-2017 (n=152). Patients were randomized into groups with traditional management and ERP. The postoperative complications, length of stay (LOS) and program adherence were estimated. RESULTS. There was no difference in complication rate in first and second series, and between groups. The postoperative length of stay in the first cohort of patients with ERP was 4.7±0.1, in the second - 5.8±0.2 days (p=0.0003). Age and comorbidity rate did not affect the outcomes of treatment. The factor associated with doctor was significant in terms of discharge. The postoperative LOSin patients with traditional management decreased from 9±0,6 to 7,8±0,3 (p=0,046) with implementation of ERP. CONCLUSION. ERP reduces the postoperative length of stay and does not affect the postoperative complications. This Protocol is doctor-dependent. The implementation of ERP improves the results of treatment for all patients in the clinic.
About the Authors
S. I. Achkasov
State Scientific Centre of Coloproctology
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
E. S. Surovegin
State Scientific Centre of Coloproctology
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
O. I. Sushkov
State Scientific Centre of Coloproctology
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
I. V. Lukashevych
State Scientific Centre of Coloproctology
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
A. V. Savushkin
State Scientific Centre of Coloproctology
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Затевахин, И.И. Клинические рекомендации по внедрению программы ускоренного выздоровления пациентов после плановых хирургических вмешательств на ободочной кишке./И.И.Затевахин, И.Н.Пасечник, С.И.Ачкасов и соавт.// Доктор.Ру. Анестезиология и реаниматология. Мед. реабилитация. - 2016. - № 1 (129). - с. 8-21
2. Лукашевич, И.В. Результаты внедрения оптимизированного протокола периоперационного ведения пациентов, перенесших резекцию ободочной кишки (проспективное рандомозированное исследование)./ И.В.Лукашевич, С.И.Ачкасов, О.И.Сушков и соавт.// Колопроктология. - 2015. -№ 53 (3). - с. 52-59.
3. Ачкасов, С.И. Влияние полноты реализации программы ускоренного выздоровления пациентов, перенесших резекцию ободочной кишки по поводу рака, на эффективность лечения./ С.И.Ачкасов, И.В.Лукашевич, Е.С.Суровегин // Онкологическая колопроктология. - 2016. - № 2 (6). - с. 29-34.
4. Charlson, M.E. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation./ M.Charlson, P.Pompei, K.Ales et al.// Journal of chronic diseases. - 1987. -№ 5 (40). - p. 373-383.
5. Gillissen, F. Sustainability of an Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Program (ERAS) in Colonic Surgery./ F.Gillissen, S.Ament, J.Maessen, J. et al. // World Journal of Surgery. - 2015. - № 2 (39). - p. 526-533.
6. Greco, M. Enhanced recovery program in colorectal surgery: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials./ M.Greco, G.Capretti, L.Beretta.// World Journal of Surgery. - 2014. - № 6 (38). - p. 1531-1541.
7. Gustafsson, U.O. Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colonic surgery: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS®) society recommendations./ U.Gustafsson, M.Scott, W.Schwenk // World Journal of Surgery. 2013. - № 37. - p. 259-284.
8. Health and Social Care Information Centre National Bowel Cancer Audit Report - 2015.
9. Kehlet, H. Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation./ H.Kehlet, W.Douglas.// Br. J. Anaesth. - 1997. -№ 5 (78). - p. 606-617.
10. Kehlet, H. Care after colonic operation - Is it evidence-based? Results from a multinational survey in Europe and the United States./ H.Kehlet, M.Büchler, R.Beart // Journal of the American College of Surgeons. - 2006. - № 1 (202). - p. 45-54.
11. Scheirer, M.A. Is sustainability possible? A review and commentary on empirical studies of program sustainability / M.Scheirer.// American Journal of Evaluation. - 2005. - № 3 (26). - p. 320-347.
12. Varadhan, K.K. The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway for patients undergoing major elective open colorectal surgery: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials./ K.Varadhan, K.Neal, C.Dejong // Clinical Nutrition. - 2010. - № 4 (29). -p. 434-440.
Review
For citations:
Achkasov S.I., Surovegin E.S., Sushkov O.I., Lukashevych I.V., Savushkin A.V. RESULTS OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ENHANCED RECOVERY PROGRAM IN COLOPROCTOLOGY. Koloproktologia. 2018;(2):32-38. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33878/2073-7556-2018-0-2-32-38
Views:
483
Email this article 
