gnckКолопроктологияKoloproktologia2073-75562686-7303Russian Association of Coloproctology10.33878/2073-7556-2025-24-4-106-119gnck-2076Research ArticleОРИГИНАЛЬНЫЕ СТАТЬИORIGINAL ARTICLESПроспективное одноцентровое наблюдательное исследование энергетических устройств в колоректальной хирургии (перевод статьи «A Prospective Single Centre Observational Study on Energy Devices in Colorectal Surgery»)A Prospective Single Centre Observational Study on Energy Devices in Colorectal Surgeryhttps://orcid.org/0009-0004-5583-2442SanderwaleJ.SanderwaleJ.

Joanna Joanna Sanderwale

Manipal, Karnataka

Joanna Sanderwale

Manipal, Karnataka

joanna.sanderwale@gmail.comhttps://orcid.org/0009-0000-4946-6176KudvaA.KudvaA.

Annappa Kudva

Manipal, Karnataka

Annappa Kudva

Manipal, Karnataka

annappa.kudva@manipal.eduhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7277-7295JacobJ. А.JacobJ. Abraham

Jithin A. Jacob

Manipal, Karnataka

Dr. Jithin Abraham Jacob — working as Assistant professor in the Department of General Surgery

Manipal, Karnataka

Ph: 00919632883146

jithin.abraham@manipal.eduKasturba Medical college, MAHEИндияKasturba Medical college, MAHEIndiaKasturba Medical college, MAHEИндияKasturba Medical college, MAHE, Manipal, Karnataka, IndiaIndia202519112025244106119Copyright © Sanderwale J., Kudva A., Jacob J.А., 20252025Sanderwale J., Kudva A., Jacob J.А.Sanderwale J., Kudva A., Jacob J.A.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.ruproctology.com/jour/article/view/2076ЦЕЛЬ

ЦЕЛЬ: оценить применение ультразвукового скальпеля и электрокоагуляции в колоректальной хирургии для принятия обоснованных решений и разработки наилучших методов.

ПАЦИЕНТЫ И МЕТОДЫ

ПАЦИЕНТЫ И МЕТОДЫ: проспективное наблюдательное исследование в центре третьего уровня медицинской помощи (19.12.2022–30.09.2024). Данные собраны и проанализированы с помощью SPSS 23. Исследование одобрено (IEC2:474/2022) и зарегистрировано (CTRI/2022/12/048254).

РЕЗУЛЬТАТЫ

РЕЗУЛЬТАТЫ: группы сопоставимы по исходным характеристикам. Не выявлено значимых различий в продолжительности операции, интраоперационным кровотечениям, отделяемое по дренажу (48 ч) и койкодню между группами.

ВЫВОД

ВЫВОД: ультразвуковой скальпель и электрокоагуляция являются ценными инструментами для диссекции и гемостаза в колоректальной хирургии, что критически важно для эффективных и безопасных малоинвазивных подходов. Необходимо оценить отдаленные результаты.

BACKGROUND

BACKGROUND: Advances in colorectal surgery include energy devices for precise dissection and hemostasis. This observational study evaluates the ultrasonic scalpel and electrocautery in colorectal surgeries, analyzing intra- and postoperative parameters to inform decisions and best practices.

METHODS

METHODS: Prospective observational study at a tertiary center (12/19/2022–09/30/2024). Data collected and analyzed with SPSS 23.

RESULTS

RESULTS: Comparable groups in baseline characteristics. There were no significant differences in operative time, intraoperative bleeding, postoperative drainage (48h), or hospital stay between the ultrasonic scalpel and electrocautery.

CONCLUSION

CONCLUSION: The ultrasonic scalpel and electrocautery are valuable tools for dissection and hemostasis in colorectal surgery, crucial for effective and safe minimally invasive approaches. Long-term effects should be determined. Study approved (IEC2:474/2022) and registered (CTRI/2022/12/048254).

harmonicelectrosurgerycolorectalmonopolarno funding has been received from the external sources for this study and all the charges incurred during the study are covered withing the normal treatment protocol of the hospital under MAHE, Manipal.ReferencesHotta T, Takifuji K, Yokoyama S, Matsuda K, et al. Literature review of the energy sources for performing laparoscopic colorectal surgery. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2012 Jan 27;4(1):1–8. PMID: 22347536; PMCID: PMC3277876.Hotta T, Takifuji K, Yokoyama S, Matsuda K, Higashiguchi T, Tominaga T et al. Literature review of the energy sources for performing laparoscopic colorectal surgery. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2012 Jan 27;4(1):1-8. PMID: 22347536; PMCID: PMC3277876.Campagnacci R, de Sanctis A, Baldarelli M, Rimini M, et al. Electrothermal bipolar vessel sealing device vs. ultrasonic coagulating shears in laparoscopic colectomies: a comparative study. Surg Endosc. 2007 Sep;21(9):1526–31. Epub 2007 Feb 8. PMID: 17287913.Campagnacci R, de Sanctis A, Baldarelli M, Rimini M, Lezoche G, Guerrieri M. Electrothermal bipolar vessel sealing device vs. ultrasonic coagulating shears in laparoscopic colectomies: a comparative study. Surg Endosc. 2007 Sep;21(9):1526-31. Epub 2007 Feb 8. PMID: 17287913.Takada M, Ichihara T, Kuroda Y. Comparative study of electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer and ultrasonic coagulating shears in laparoscopic colectomy. Surg Endosc. 2005 Feb;19(2):226–8. Epub 2004 Dec 2. PMID: 15573241.Takada M, Ichihara T, Kuroda Y. Comparative study of electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer and ultrasonic coagulating shears in laparoscopic colectomy. Surg Endosc. 2005 Feb;19(2):226-8. Epub 2004 Dec 2. PMID: 15573241.Targarona EM, Balague C, Marin J, et al. Energy sources for laparoscopic colectomy: a prospective randomized comparison of conventional electrosurgery, bipolar computer-controlled electrosurgery and ultrasonic dissection. Operative outcome and costs analysis. Surg Innov. 2005 Dec;12(4):339–44.Targarona EM, Balague C, Marin J, Neto RB, Martinez C, Garriga Jet al. Energy sources for laparoscopic colectomy: a prospective randomized comparison of conventional electrosurgery, bipolar computer-controlled electrosurgery and ultrasonic dissection. Operative outcome and costs analysis. Surg Innov. 2005 Dec;12(4):339-44.Sista F, Abruzzese V, Schietroma M, et al. New Ultrasonic Scalpel versus Conventional Hemostasis in Right Colon Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Dig Surg. 1 March 2014; 30 (4-6): 355–361.Federico Sista, Valentina Abruzzese, Mario Schietroma, Emanuela Marina Cecilia, Antonella Mattei, Gianfranco Amicucci; New UltrasonicScalpel versus Conventional Hemostasis in Right Colon Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Dig Surg 1 March 2014; 30 (4-6): 355–361.Rimonda R, Arezzo A, Garrone, et al. Electrothermal Bipolar Vessel Sealing System vs. UltrasonicScalpel in Colorectal Laparoscopic Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized Study. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. 52(4):p 657-661, April 2009. |Rimonda, Roberto M.D.; Arezzo, Alberto M.D.; Garrone, Corrado M.D.; Allaix, Marco Ettore M.D.; Giraudo, Giuseppe M.D.; et al Electrothermal Bipolar Vessel Sealing System vs. UltrasonicScalpel in Colorectal Laparoscopic Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized Study. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 52(4):p 657-661, April 2009.Kalari P, Nirhale DS, Vajja R, Galam P. Comparison of Conventional Bipolar Electrocautery and Ultrasonic Ultrasonic Scalpel in Colorectal Cancer Surgeries. Cureus. 2022 Mar 17;14(3):e23255. PMID: 35449609; PMCID: PMC9012577Kalari P, Nirhale DS, Vajja R, Galam P. Comparison of Conventional Bipolar Electrocautery and Ultrasonic UltrasonicScalpel in Colorectal Cancer Surgeries. Cureus. 2022 Mar 17;14(3):e23255. PMID: 35449609; PMCID: PMC9012577

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.